Snotpumpen — CS2 Stats

76561197972945927[U:1:12680199]

379Tracked matches66%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,206Hours in CS49Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,235Purple band · top ~11.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9955 of 20847 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnotpumpenFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,235 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning43
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression4.9
Utility5.2
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time520ms−120ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2217577%-0.02
cacheA2012860%-0.02
mirageC1881044%-0.03
ancientD124833%-0.06
dust2C104640%-0.04
anubisD93633%-0.04
nukeS97278%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,736Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
3,600Matches
41.7%Match win rate
44.1%Headshot %
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
11,449MVPs
1,358Hours (in match)
3,729Bombs planted
1,532Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,898
AWP13,925
P2501,498
Tec-91,190
Knife971

Lifetime map wins

5,962inferno
4,980dust2
1,905nuke
1,436cbble
707train
51dust
36assault
35lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

264Matches
52%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
62.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2658%0.7611.2
Cache2264%0.7410.8
Mirage2152%0.6811.1
Nuke1656%0.7712.2
Ancient1242%0.5510.3
Dust2944%0.6713.0
Anubis944%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
517msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
8.42HE damage / grenade
7.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3968 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9472% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache14–16-0.0312%28 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0526%28 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0719%28 Aug
cache13–3-0.0212%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0310%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0211%27 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0710%27 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0411%27 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0215%27 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0810%26 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0819%26 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0414%26 Aug
ancient7–13-0.059%26 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0729%26 Aug
cache13–10-0.0517%25 Aug
cache16–14-0.0311%25 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0217%25 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0610%25 Aug
inferno13–8-0.047%25 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0627%25 Aug
anubis6–13-0.019%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0112%25 Aug
inferno13–50.0118%24 Aug
dust213–100.0211%24 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0517%18 Aug
cache13–80.0327%18 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0830%18 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0421%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0524%18 Aug
inferno16–14-0.044%17 Aug
cache13–8-0.0411%17 Aug
anubis20–22-0.0716%17 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0620%17 Aug
inferno7–13-0.057%16 Aug
mirage13–70.0417%16 Aug
cache11–13-0.0416%16 Aug
nuke13–100.028%16 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0310%16 Aug
cache13–16-0.0220%16 Aug
cache13–5-0.0436%15 Aug
inferno13–8-0.037%15 Aug
dust213–8-0.0221%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.0518%15 Aug
nuke13–90.0610%15 Aug
inferno13–70.0121%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.0219%15 Aug
mirage13–90.0011%15 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0020%15 Aug
cache5–13-0.0825%15 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0410%14 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0312%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.067%14 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0420%14 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0410%14 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0616%14 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0019%14 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0918%14 Aug
cache13–6-0.0525%14 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0524%13 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0816%13 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0627%13 Aug
cache13–50.0317%12 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0717%10 Aug
cache10–13-0.0215%10 Aug
inferno13–110.0210%10 Aug
cache13–11-0.0416%9 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0718%9 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0110%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0331%9 Aug
anubis13–40.0025%9 Aug
cache13–9-0.0316%9 Aug
dust24–13-0.0225%8 Aug
mirage13–70.0220%8 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0519%7 Aug
cache7–13-0.0021%7 Aug
cache7–13-0.0416%7 Aug
cache13–20.0410%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0318%5 Aug
inferno4–130.0111%4 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0613%4 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0424%4 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0417%4 Aug
mirage13–00.0414%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0117%2 Aug
dust215–19-0.0514%2 Aug
inferno13–20.0010%2 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0318%2 Aug
ancient13–11-0.1011%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0623%2 Aug
dust213–9-0.0710%2 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0311%2 Aug
inferno13–30.146%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0721%2 Aug
dust217–19-0.0110%1 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0417%1 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0322%1 Aug
mirage13–60.0320%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0915%31 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0918%31 Jul
dust28–13-0.0525%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →