Slippers

Slippers — CS2 Stats

US76561197972869475[U:1:12603747]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,189Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,282Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64138 of 252504 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,499 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+271Premier CS Rating · 21,011 → 21,282

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,282 +1,283 21 Jun – 17 Oct · 34 days played
17,58022,251peak 22,25121 Jun17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,499 +0 1 Sept – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,4991,499peak 1,4991 Sept20 Sept
22,614Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,499Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,499
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 969 below peak (22,251)
  • -279 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,702 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,718 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSlippersFACEITLevel 7 · 1,499 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,282 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,499csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning51
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateTWLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time580ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 1–5 · dust2, 30 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · dust2, 5 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · nuke, 7 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 21 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2010–1050%-0.00
nukeB178–947%-0.01
anubisS1510–567%-0.01
cacheB136–746%-0.01
dust2D123–925%-0.00
mirageD124–833%-0.01
infernoS75–271%-0.00
overpass—42–250%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,257Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
72.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis9648%0.9614.9
Ancient8140%0.9414.6
Inferno6448%0.9815.3
Nuke5448%0.8412.7
Overpass4149%0.9514.1
Mirage2665%1.0214.8
Dust22429%0.9114.4
Vertigo1817%0.7813.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
578msReaction time
47.2%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.50HE damage / grenade
11.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.5096% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis15–150.0314%17 Oct →
ancient13–50.0817%17 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.079%11 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0418%11 Oct →
mirage10–130.0010%11 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0433%11 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0322%11 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0214%11 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0310%11 Oct →
dust213–80.0512%10 Oct →
ancient13–80.0110%10 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0420%10 Oct →
ancient13–40.0226%6 Oct →
cache13–30.0820%5 Oct →
dust20–3-0.0150%5 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0713%4 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0319%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.0317%4 Oct →
ancient13–80.0619%4 Oct →
cache11–130.0418%3 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0110%3 Oct →
anubis13–70.0713%1 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0715%27 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.038%25 Sept →
nuke15–150.0014%24 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0111%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0523%8 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0629%7 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0911%7 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0420%7 Sept →
inferno13–80.0818%7 Sept →
anubis11–130.0214%7 Sept →
ancient8–130.0015%6 Sept →
nuke20–22-0.068%4 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0020%3 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.025%31 Aug →
ancient13–90.0116%31 Aug →
nuke13–100.0811%30 Aug →
mirage10–130.0818%30 Aug →
dust21–50.1625%30 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.075%30 Aug →
mirage16–140.036%22 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0622%22 Aug →
mirage11–130.0312%17 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0215%17 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0117%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.007%16 Aug →
inferno13–80.0321%16 Aug →
mirage13–40.0221%16 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0317%15 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0213%15 Aug →
ancient12–160.0221%15 Aug →
dust213–50.0414%12 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0330%12 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0317%11 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0121%10 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0611%10 Aug →
cache9–130.0211%9 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0417%3 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0221%3 Aug →
nuke13–40.0311%2 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0319%2 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0516%2 Aug →
ancient13–80.0114%29 Jul →
cache13–6-0.075%29 Jul →
anubis13–100.0119%26 Jul →
nuke13–100.0116%26 Jul →
nuke13–50.078%25 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.057%25 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0114%25 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0520%25 Jul →
cache13–3-0.0214%25 Jul →
nuke8–130.0110%25 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.042%24 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0217%24 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0511%24 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0713%21 Jul →
nuke13–90.0315%21 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0515%19 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.043%19 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.046%19 Jul →
cache13–40.0313%19 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0117%19 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0117%19 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0713%18 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0117%18 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0624%18 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0620%18 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0114%18 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0321%17 Jul →
ancient13–90.0522%16 Jul →
overpass13–90.0228%25 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0418%25 Jun →
overpass15–15-0.009%23 Jun →
anubis16–140.0323%22 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0617%22 Jun →
ancient9–130.0013%22 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.049%21 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0113%21 Jun →
inferno13–20.0212%21 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.