Razer

Razer — CS2 Stats

76561197972263459[U:1:11997731]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,803Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,652Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,622Blue band · top ~30.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,284 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,622 +1,327 10 Aug – 29 Oct · 34 days played
13,29514,999peak 14,99910 Aug29 Oct
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,284Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-05-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,284
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 377 below peak (14,999)
  • +904 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,327 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 378 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches14777+70
Win rate52%47%+5pp
K/D1.240.98+0.26
Headshot %49%37%+12pp

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 30 Oct 2026; previous 29 Aug 2026 → 25 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate35.9%43.8%44.8%8.9% short
Shot accuracy12.2%12.0%12.4%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.021.03above
Match win rate46.3%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRazerFACEITLevel 5 · 1,284 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,622 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,284csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning48
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateWWLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility6.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch5.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time599ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–9 · inferno, 11 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 28 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 17cacheWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2111–1052%0.01
nukeA1911–858%0.00
ancientA1710–759%0.00
mirageB136–746%-0.01
cacheD112–918%-0.02
dust2D112–918%-0.01
anubisC83–538%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

122,856Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
5,649Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
35.9%Headshot %
12.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
14,682MVPs
2,433Hours (in match)
6,282Bombs planted
1,323Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,587
AWP22,629
P2504,809
MAC-104,000
MP93,685
FAMAS3,232

Lifetime map wins

13,486inferno
13,314nuke
5,626vertigo
1,780dust2
1,207train
118cbble
58office
55safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

390Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
74.2ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8553%0.9315.3
Inferno6749%0.9114.3
Anubis5648%1.1216.5
Nuke5263%1.0615.5
Overpass2654%1.0914.8
Vertigo1127%1.0817.1
Mirage825%0.7411.5
Dust2520%0.6412.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
61.0%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
593msReaction time
45.8%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
11.34HE damage / grenade
10.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.6647% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–8-0.0110%29 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0119%29 Oct →
mirage11–130.0524%29 Oct →
cache8–13-0.029%29 Oct →
ancient13–50.0513%28 Oct →
inferno13–40.0212%28 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.047%28 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0740%28 Oct →
nuke13–100.0110%19 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.096%19 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0518%19 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0310%19 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0417%15 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0217%15 Oct →
ancient14–160.0410%15 Oct →
dust21–130.0319%12 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0013%12 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0315%11 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0510%11 Oct →
dust27–13-0.003%11 Oct →
cache13–110.0115%9 Oct →
mirage13–50.0518%9 Oct →
inferno13–110.0111%9 Oct →
ancient1–130.006%8 Oct →
mirage13–160.0513%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0310%7 Oct →
dust23–130.0119%6 Oct →
dust216–13-0.029%6 Oct →
anubis10–130.0221%6 Oct →
anubis7–130.0114%30 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0214%30 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.026%30 Sept →
nuke13–90.028%30 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.008%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.0113%30 Sept →
anubis6–130.0118%30 Sept →
dust27–13-0.029%30 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0612%30 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0116%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0110%29 Sept →
inferno10–130.028%29 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0116%29 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0813%29 Sept →
dust215–150.0018%28 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0118%24 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0319%23 Sept →
inferno5–130.0221%23 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.026%23 Sept →
inferno11–130.0116%23 Sept →
inferno13–100.0415%23 Sept →
inferno13–70.0015%23 Sept →
mirage13–100.0414%23 Sept →
nuke3–130.018%22 Sept →
nuke10–130.0625%22 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.075%22 Sept →
mirage10–30.0516%22 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0719%22 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0313%22 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0120%22 Sept →
ancient13–110.0616%22 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0016%22 Sept →
nuke9–130.0519%21 Sept →
inferno13–80.017%21 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0115%21 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.015%21 Sept →
mirage13–70.0011%21 Sept →
dust23–13-0.028%20 Sept →
inferno13–110.0119%20 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0330%20 Sept →
ancient13–20.0417%19 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0212%18 Sept →
ancient13–90.0716%18 Sept →
nuke13–90.0810%18 Sept →
nuke9–130.066%18 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0212%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0521%17 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0310%17 Sept →
cache7–130.0416%17 Sept →
dust27–130.0129%17 Sept →
nuke16–120.028%12 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0311%9 Sept →
nuke7–130.034%7 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0220%6 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0412%6 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0618%28 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0816%23 Aug →
inferno13–60.0613%23 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0114%23 Aug →
ancient13–70.0921%22 Aug →
cache7–130.0417%22 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.015%19 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.015%19 Aug →
inferno13–60.0717%13 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0413%13 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0513%13 Aug →
inferno10–130.0015%13 Aug →
nuke13–80.0216%12 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0320%11 Aug →
inferno13–90.0916%11 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0412%10 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.