Buffjamin Moggedjahu — CS2 Stats

IL76561197971977245[U:1:11711517]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,486Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,493Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,488Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8072 of 55122 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,007 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	39.2%	51.9%
Shot accuracy	15.0%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.20	1.08
Match win rate	46.8%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning59

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateLWLLTLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5

Aggression9.2

Utility4.5

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.4

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning5.9

Utility4.5

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time464ms+10ms

first ⅓ avg 454ms → last ⅓ avg 464ms

Headshot accuracy23.7%+3.7%

first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — debris 9–2

13–0Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	23	11–12	48%	0.02
nuke	B	17	8–9	47%	0.03
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.00
cache	S	12	8–4	67%	0.01
dust2	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.02
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	0.06
shelter	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05
debris	—	2	1–1	50%	0.14
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.16
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

121,134Lifetime kills

1.20K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

5,994Matches

46.8%Match win rate

39.2%Headshot %

15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

14,630MVPs

2,313Hours (in match)

5,215Bombs planted

1,288Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,365

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,668

AWP12,032

PP-Bizon10,892

P2000 / USP-S10,042

P909,039

Desert Eagle4,931

Glock-183,978

Tec-92,695

SSG 082,470

Lifetime map wins

19,262dust2

5,273inferno

3,393nuke

813cbble

572office

522vertigo

444train

383lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

231Matches

59%Win rate

1.48Avg K/D

93.1ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	83	60%	1.57	18.8
Inferno	40	50%	1.40	18.3
Dust2	28	61%	1.34	18.7
Anubis	24	71%	1.50	16.9
Nuke	21	57%	1.53	20.5
Ancient	20	60%	1.51	19.8
Overpass	11	55%	1.29	20.6
Train	1	100%	2.30	23.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

48.2%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

6.9°Preaim

464msReaction time

34.4%T opening success

53.0%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

12.3%Flash assists

4.89HE damage / grenade

5.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.4197% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	5–13	-0.07	16%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	19%	18 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	23%	18 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.03	43%	15 Aug →
anubis	12–12	0.03	29%	15 Aug →
fachwerk	8–13	0.03	23%	14 Aug →
shelter	13–4	0.16	30%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–2	0.09	21%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–0	-0.00	0%	14 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.03	100%	14 Aug →
inferno	1–5	-0.11	40%	14 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	12%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	13%	11 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.06	37%	9 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.00	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.14	24%	9 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	18%	8 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	11%	6 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	18%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.00	15%	4 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.07	44%	4 Aug →
mirage	0–7	0.02	25%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.06	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	15%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	27%	3 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	11%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	12%	3 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.05	13%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–9	-0.04	11%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	18%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–0	-0.00	36%	31 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.08	23%	31 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	10%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	15%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.00	25%	31 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.03	23%	30 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.05	23%	30 Jul →
inferno	1–10	-0.06	30%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	27%	23 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	13%	22 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.03	29%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.07	25%	21 Jul →
office	13–10	0.07	31%	21 Jul →
debris	6–9	-0.01	17%	20 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	29%	19 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.12	23%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.07	18%	19 Jul →
poseidon	9–7	-0.01	17%	18 Jul →
debris	9–2	0.29	16%	18 Jul →
eldorado	9–2	0.16	17%	18 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.05	100%	18 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.08	0%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	23%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.15	19%	18 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.05	8%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.08	18%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.05	88%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.08	17%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.12	0%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.04	83%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.08	44%	18 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.09	20%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.13	19%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	12%	17 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.11	27%	17 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.06	20%	16 Jul →
ancient	12–12	-0.03	5%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	17%	14 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	21%	11 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.10	21%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.06	7%	11 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.08	17%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.06	15%	11 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	11%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	12%	11 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.03	20%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.05	90%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	27%	11 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	15%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.04	26%	10 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	17%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	4%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.10	17%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.11	11%	10 Jul →
cache	6–2	0.02	24%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	13%	10 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	14%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.11	19%	10 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.00	16%	10 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.11	28%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.09	19%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.07	12%	9 Jul →
shelter	13–10	-0.05	17%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	27%	9 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.08	26%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.08	19%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.17	25%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	21%	8 Jul →