wh0am1

wh0am1 — CS2 Stats

76561197971648113[U:1:11382385]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,984Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21856 of 251934 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,878 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +1,113 25 Aug – 14 Oct · 34 days played
21,91425,000peak 25,00025 Aug14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,878 +0 30 Aug – 23 Sept · 3 observations
1,8781,878peak 1,87830 Aug23 Sept
25,102Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,878Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-08-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,878
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1 below peak (25,000)
  • +2,566 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwh0am1FACEITLevel 9 · 1,878 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,878csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning74
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 479ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility4.4
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning7.4
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels7.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time487ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 503ms → last ⅓ avg 487ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 15 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 30 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2413–1154%0.01
ancientB178–947%0.00
nukeC156–940%0.02
mirageC146–843%-0.01
cacheS1410–471%0.03
infernoB105–550%0.01
anubisB63–350%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

511Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
83.3ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2075%1.1215.0
Mirage1861%1.0417.0
Ancient1662%1.0717.8
Cache714%0.7913.0
Nuke617%1.1416.7
Dust2667%1.4320.0
Anubis6100%1.8123.0
Overpass450%1.0217.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.2%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
479msReaction time
65.6%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
11.16HE damage / grenade
1.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.9896 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.0324%14 Oct →
mirage13–20.0618%14 Oct →
dust216–120.0525%14 Oct →
anubis16–12-0.0124%13 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0121%13 Oct →
mirage6–130.0033%10 Oct →
mirage13–110.0120%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0225%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0433%7 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.019%7 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0422%6 Oct →
cache13–110.0931%6 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0125%6 Oct →
cache13–90.0213%5 Oct →
inferno13–90.0322%5 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0217%5 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0429%3 Oct →
ancient13–50.0613%3 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0324%3 Oct →
inferno13–50.0515%3 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0219%2 Oct →
anubis5–130.0214%2 Oct →
nuke13–110.0628%30 Sept →
inferno13–110.0410%30 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0332%29 Sept →
inferno15–150.0712%29 Sept →
nuke14–160.0623%28 Sept →
ancient13–100.0315%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0023%27 Sept →
anubis13–80.0515%27 Sept →
mirage13–10.0324%27 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0112%26 Sept →
inferno13–60.0515%26 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.070%26 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0419%26 Sept →
cache16–130.0627%25 Sept →
dust213–90.0415%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0215%24 Sept →
mirage13–70.0621%24 Sept →
dust213–110.0020%23 Sept →
cache13–160.0013%23 Sept →
ancient5–130.007%22 Sept →
cache5–13-0.1117%22 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0520%22 Sept →
nuke11–130.0811%21 Sept →
dust213–80.0616%21 Sept →
dust28–130.0221%21 Sept →
ancient13–100.0415%18 Sept →
inferno3–130.0025%18 Sept →
dust213–6-0.030%18 Sept →
mirage6–130.0212%18 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0922%17 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0313%17 Sept →
dust213–110.0521%16 Sept →
cache13–100.0526%16 Sept →
ancient13–110.0717%16 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0129%16 Sept →
cache13–10.1627%15 Sept →
dust27–130.0821%15 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0216%15 Sept →
dust213–9-0.069%14 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0013%14 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0911%14 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0512%14 Sept →
ancient7–130.0213%13 Sept →
dust216–140.0212%13 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.036%12 Sept →
nuke14–160.038%12 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0413%2 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0216%2 Sept →
nuke10–130.0522%2 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0415%1 Sept →
cache10–130.0328%1 Sept →
nuke13–80.0521%1 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0910%1 Sept →
cache13–40.0114%31 Aug →
ancient13–50.0513%31 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0212%31 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0435%30 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0326%30 Aug →
dust28–130.0131%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0416%29 Aug →
cache16–120.0413%29 Aug →
dust213–60.0918%28 Aug →
ancient15–150.0018%28 Aug →
anubis13–50.1015%28 Aug →
dust213–110.0617%28 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.058%28 Aug →
dust213–160.0116%28 Aug →
ancient7–130.0110%27 Aug →
nuke5–130.0115%27 Aug →
cache13–40.1019%27 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0016%26 Aug →
nuke13–50.0322%26 Aug →
ancient13–30.0513%26 Aug →
dust213–70.0919%26 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0010%25 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.018%25 Aug →
nuke3–00.0311%25 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.029%25 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.