AntsLambi

AntsLambi — CS2 Stats

EE76561197969869228[U:1:9603500]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

795Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,371Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 11 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,414 +114 11 May27 Jun · 8 days played
10,98111,763peak 11,76311 May27 Jun
12,041Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-05-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate36.9%43.8%44.8%7.9% short
Shot accuracy7.1%12.0%12.4%5.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.851.021.040.19 short
Match win rate35.2%44.7%45.2%10.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAntsLambiFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim24
Positioning42
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.5pp headshot accuracy · +41ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim2.4
Utility6.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 57% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.4
Positioning4.2
Utility6.8
Mechanics1.5
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time601ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 8–0 · italy, 27 Jun
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · mirage, 22 Jul
414msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · poseidon, 21 Jul
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 21 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2214864%-0.03
mirageD1951426%-0.02
infernoB147750%-0.04
cacheD124833%-0.01
nukeA95456%-0.03
ancientS65183%-0.02
officeS65183%-0.01
vertigo3030%0.00
anubis31233%-0.04
overpass31233%-0.07
shelter1010%-0.09
poseidon1010%-0.21
italy110100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,198Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
2,401Matches
35.2%Match win rate
36.9%Headshot %
7.1%Shot accuracy
2,953MVPs
866Hours (in match)
3,931Bombs planted
391Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,439
AWP4,470
MP92,673
MAC-101,986
XM10141,336
Knife651

Lifetime map wins

2,816inferno
2,701dust2
1,458nuke
641train
381office
205vertigo
170italy
95bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

89Matches
52%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
64.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3250%0.9112.2
Dust21457%0.8911.4
Ancient1164%0.8111.7
Nuke956%0.9011.8
Cache850%0.6010.4
Inferno743%0.6811.0
Anubis540%1.0213.0
Overpass250%0.446.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
25.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.2%Spray accuracy
57.0%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
600msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
32.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
8.97HE damage / grenade
14.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0878% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.0011%13 Sept
nuke13–50.118%13 Sept
mirage9–130.0316%13 Sept
dust213–40.0516%13 Sept
vertigo5–13-0.0113%11 Sept
mirage8–130.0022%11 Sept
dust213–8-0.0133%11 Sept
cache10–13-0.0416%2 Sept
mirage13–50.0113%29 Aug
cache0–13-0.0633%29 Aug
mirage13–5-0.047%29 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0217%25 Aug
dust213–5-0.028%24 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0115%24 Aug
inferno13–9-0.064%22 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0619%22 Aug
office13–20.0327%22 Aug
office8–13-0.036%22 Aug
mirage13–00.024%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0410%11 Aug
dust216–140.0228%11 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0122%8 Aug
inferno7–130.0317%7 Aug
cache13–110.0118%7 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0511%7 Aug
dust28–13-0.025%7 Aug
cache10–13-0.0314%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0711%31 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0614%31 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0712%30 Jul
dust213–30.017%22 Jul
cache13–40.0442%22 Jul
mirage7–13-0.014%22 Jul
nuke9–13-0.068%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0314%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0923%22 Jul
cache5–13-0.0414%22 Jul
mirage0–2-0.05100%22 Jul
dust216–14-0.0416%21 Jul
shelter4–13-0.098%21 Jul
vertigo0–13-0.060%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0516%21 Jul
mirage13–110.0120%21 Jul
nuke13–70.0119%21 Jul
office13–8-0.0022%21 Jul
poseidon3–9-0.2113%21 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0219%20 Jul
inferno5–9-0.2015%20 Jul
inferno6–13-0.032%20 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0524%20 Jul
anubis13–6-0.017%20 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1017%20 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0115%11 Jul
office13–40.0413%11 Jul
dust24–13-0.0324%11 Jul
dust213–50.0210%10 Jul
mirage2–13-0.107%10 Jul
cache5–13-0.057%10 Jul
dust27–13-0.080%10 Jul
inferno8–13-0.092%4 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0218%4 Jul
dust213–6-0.009%4 Jul
cache4–130.0417%28 Jun
italy8–00.1314%27 Jun
office13–5-0.054%27 Jun
dust23–13-0.0911%27 Jun
dust213–110.0214%26 Jun
inferno13–100.0118%26 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0516%24 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0313%24 Jun
dust213–60.0914%24 Jun
dust213–10-0.095%23 Jun
inferno9–4-0.125%21 Jun
inferno9–30.1115%21 Jun
nuke9–4-0.0814%21 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0619%20 Jun
inferno1–9-0.276%16 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0616%15 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0619%15 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0217%10 Jun
inferno12–120.0411%10 Jun
mirage7–130.0227%4 Jun
vertigo7–130.0713%26 May
dust213–6-0.1121%22 May
overpass6–2-0.1014%22 May
inferno3–13-0.0411%22 May
dust213–10-0.035%22 May
mirage13–160.0110%22 May
cache13–30.0820%18 May
dust210–13-0.0318%16 May
inferno13–8-0.0113%16 May
dust28–13-0.0927%16 May
cache13–8-0.0020%16 May
dust215–15-0.0411%13 May
overpass7–13-0.057%13 May
office13–11-0.0524%13 May
inferno13–50.129%13 May
cache12–120.0213%13 May
cache7–13-0.0313%12 May
mirage14–16-0.0111%11 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →