Liimatainen

Liimatainen — CS2 Stats

76561197969007183[U:1:8741455]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

962Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,929Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#55116 of 251770 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,929 +1,721 31 Aug – 7 Oct · 12 days played
20,20822,427peak 22,42731 Aug7 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,376 +0 31 Aug – 3 Sept · 2 observations
1,3761,376peak 1,37631 Aug3 Sept
22,427Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,376Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 498 below peak (22,427)
  • +1,721 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,071 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLiimatainenFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,929 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,376csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning65
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateWLLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility7.0
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.5
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time513ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 501ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 12 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 9–4 · inferno, 10 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · mirage, 12 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
14–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 14anubisWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1911–858%0.01
dust2C188–1044%0.02
anubisD185–1328%-0.01
infernoS1611–569%0.01
nukeS1412–286%0.03
cacheB84–450%0.02
mirage—43–175%0.01
overpass—21–150%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

341Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
87.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3256%1.1718.0
Anubis3037%1.1316.7
Nuke2972%1.4319.0
Inferno2446%1.1116.7
Dust22268%1.2919.4
Cache1242%1.1217.8
Mirage70%1.0317.6
Vertigo3100%1.5928.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.8%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
508msReaction time
40.2%T opening success
58.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
9.89HE damage / grenade
16.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–90.0123%14 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0610%14 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0722%10 Oct →
nuke13–70.0117%10 Oct →
cache7–130.0326%10 Oct →
dust213–90.0217%10 Oct →
nuke13–10.0715%10 Oct →
inferno13–110.0526%10 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.048%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0319%10 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0410%10 Oct →
ancient9–40.0118%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0417%9 Oct →
nuke22–190.0424%9 Oct →
cache16–130.0413%9 Oct →
ancient11–130.0113%9 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0518%9 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0913%9 Oct →
ancient16–140.0019%9 Oct →
inferno9–60.0114%9 Oct →
inferno13–80.0014%7 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0015%3 Oct →
ancient13–100.0819%3 Oct →
nuke13–40.0618%3 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0117%3 Oct →
anubis13–110.0512%3 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0116%3 Oct →
dust212–120.0223%3 Oct →
mirage13–100.0211%2 Oct →
dust210–130.0618%2 Oct →
dust29–130.1112%2 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0320%2 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0215%2 Oct →
dust213–100.0611%2 Oct →
inferno8–130.0120%2 Oct →
dust213–70.0912%2 Oct →
dust213–70.0215%29 Sept →
dust222–190.0014%28 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0519%27 Sept →
cache8–130.0019%27 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0316%27 Sept →
ancient13–50.0523%27 Sept →
dust28–130.0117%27 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0323%22 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0312%22 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0224%22 Sept →
cache11–130.0520%20 Sept →
nuke13–70.0728%20 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0012%20 Sept →
inferno13–100.1014%20 Sept →
dust210–130.0211%20 Sept →
cache13–110.0111%18 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.055%17 Sept →
anubis11–130.0221%17 Sept →
ancient13–90.0319%17 Sept →
ancient13–110.0317%13 Sept →
anubis13–60.0822%13 Sept →
inferno13–20.1332%12 Sept →
nuke13–60.0826%12 Sept →
anubis10–130.0210%12 Sept →
inferno13–90.0015%12 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0013%12 Sept →
cache13–80.0315%12 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.078%12 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0023%12 Sept →
ancient11–130.049%12 Sept →
overpass8–130.0339%12 Sept →
nuke9–130.0313%12 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0312%12 Sept →
ancient10–130.0717%12 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0213%12 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.069%12 Sept →
nuke13–40.0424%12 Sept →
ancient6–130.0317%11 Sept →
mirage13–50.0523%11 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0024%11 Sept →
anubis13–70.0615%11 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0011%11 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0118%11 Sept →
ancient13–110.0220%11 Sept →
vertigo9–7-0.0333%10 Sept →
overpass9–40.0218%10 Sept →
nuke8–80.0211%10 Sept →
inferno9–40.0543%10 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0230%9 Sept →
inferno19–170.0314%8 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.004%7 Sept →
cache13–110.0224%7 Sept →
dust25–130.0412%7 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0313%6 Sept →
ancient13–100.0418%6 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0416%6 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0315%6 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0524%6 Sept →
mirage13–110.0415%6 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0520%4 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0115%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0326%4 Sept →
ancient13–110.0628%4 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0116%4 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.