Lauenborg

Lauenborg — CS2 Stats

76561197967413654[U:1:7147926]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,409Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,730Blue band · top ~29.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,730 +1,529 25 Dec – 24 Oct · 22 days played
11,40814,999peak 14,99925 Dec24 Oct
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2025-12-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 269 below peak (14,999)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 270 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLauenborgFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,730 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning52
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–56–6Last 10038%Win rateLLWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility5.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning5.2
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time604ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–0 · debris, 18 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 16–13 · nuke, 23 Oct →
445msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 26 Dec →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 7 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2510–1540%-0.00
nukeB209–1145%0.01
ancientC156–940%0.01
poseidonA95–456%-0.01
anubisD62–433%0.00
debris—41–325%-0.01
mirage—30–30%-0.05
dust2—31–233%-0.03
cache—30–30%0.01
eldorado—30–30%-0.05
train—31–233%-0.02
rooftop—31–233%0.07
overpass—32–167%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

233Matches
46%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
79.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3339%0.8914.5
Inferno2662%1.1015.5
Nuke2176%1.1514.4
Anubis944%0.9412.8
Vertigo50%1.0819.4
Mirage20%0.9414.5
Train250%0.7915.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.2%Spray accuracy
72.5%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
599msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
36.9%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.50HE damage / grenade
10.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4132 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.8851% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–130.0222%24 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0518%24 Oct →
ancient16–120.0311%24 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0014%24 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0325%23 Oct →
nuke16–130.0633%23 Oct →
nuke13–70.0425%23 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0414%23 Oct →
nuke13–60.0316%21 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0715%21 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0623%21 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0025%21 Oct →
inferno13–90.0818%19 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0412%19 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0511%19 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0415%14 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0211%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0114%2 Oct →
ancient10–130.0122%23 Aug →
cache8–130.0623%23 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0220%21 Aug →
eldorado1–9-0.1515%21 Aug →
poseidon6–9-0.0916%21 Aug →
debris1–9-0.1912%21 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0714%19 Aug →
inferno11–130.019%19 Aug →
nuke11–130.0522%19 Aug →
nuke16–140.1022%18 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0311%18 Aug →
debris9–00.3331%18 Aug →
inferno16–140.0218%17 Aug →
nuke9–130.0217%17 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0112%15 Aug →
inferno13–80.0111%15 Aug →
ancient13–80.0313%15 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.058%14 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.108%14 Aug →
poseidon9–7-0.019%14 Aug →
poseidon9–30.0320%14 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0210%13 Aug →
nuke8–130.0321%12 Aug →
ancient13–110.0215%12 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0415%12 Aug →
poseidon8–8-0.0123%12 Aug →
eldorado8–80.0415%12 Aug →
debris7–9-0.164%12 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0322%11 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0414%11 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0313%11 Aug →
poseidon9–30.0410%10 Aug →
anubis13–100.0210%10 Aug →
anubis10–130.0011%9 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.1110%9 Aug →
inferno13–60.078%9 Aug →
anubis13–80.0712%8 Aug →
ancient10–00.1213%8 Aug →
ancient9–130.0617%8 Aug →
poseidon3–9-0.1317%8 Aug →
poseidon9–6-0.0223%8 Aug →
poseidon9–30.0927%7 Aug →
eldorado5–9-0.0415%7 Aug →
poseidon7–9-0.0212%7 Aug →
debris8–8-0.0327%7 Aug →
dust27–130.0028%7 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0118%7 Aug →
anubis3–130.0213%7 Aug →
nuke13–20.0325%7 Aug →
inferno13–70.0328%7 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0224%10 Jan →
nuke3–13-0.0132%10 Jan →
inferno4–13-0.0416%5 Jan →
inferno11–130.0428%5 Jan →
inferno7–13-0.0119%3 Jan →
inferno15–150.0411%3 Jan →
nuke13–30.1325%3 Jan →
inferno13–7-0.0412%2 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0231%2 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0410%1 Jan →
nuke13–5-0.019%1 Jan →
train16–130.0215%1 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.049%1 Jan →
inferno10–60.0410%30 Dec →
inferno9–13-0.0320%30 Dec →
ancient13–30.0623%30 Dec →
inferno3–130.0213%30 Dec →
nuke13–80.0721%29 Dec →
rooftop9–50.1827%29 Dec →
rooftop8–80.0217%29 Dec →
rooftop6–9-0.009%29 Dec →
overpass5–13-0.0112%27 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0417%27 Dec →
ancient9–13-0.0428%27 Dec →
train11–13-0.0517%27 Dec →
inferno9–130.0318%26 Dec →
ancient6–130.0818%26 Dec →
overpass13–40.1213%26 Dec →
inferno13–10-0.0417%26 Dec →
train13–16-0.0119%26 Dec →
inferno7–130.0330%25 Dec →
overpass13–40.0117%25 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.