furiO_os — CS2 Stats

76561197967285967[U:1:7020239]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,118Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating18,902Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#96934 of 251934 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,432 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,902 -968 15 Aug – 14 Oct · 30 days played

21,498Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,432Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

31Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,432
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 99 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

2,541 below peak (21,443)
-15 over 30 days · steady
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,098 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning61

Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateLLWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

10–10 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2

Utility7.3

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch3.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.87 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning6.1

Utility7.3

Mechanics4.2

Opening Duels5.1

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time540ms+13ms

first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 19 Sept →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · nuke, 28 Aug →

344msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · inferno, 31 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · anubis, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 14mirageWeakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	0.03
inferno	C	16	7–9	44%	0.03
cache	C	15	6–9	40%	0.01
dust2	C	14	6–8	43%	0.02
anubis	S	14	10–4	71%	0.04
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	0.04
mirage	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches

58%Win rate

1.19Avg K/D

81.2ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	27	78%	1.45	18.4
Anubis	25	56%	0.98	14.3
Mirage	18	72%	1.01	14.1
Inferno	15	60%	1.25	18.5
Dust2	7	29%	0.80	11.3
Nuke	5	60%	1.08	19.6
Cache	5	40%	1.21	15.2
Overpass	5	100%	1.09	15.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.9%Spray accuracy

68.7%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

534msReaction time

47.5%T opening success

53.0%CT opening success

0.87Enemies flashed / flash

6.2%Flash assists

10.09HE damage / grenade

16.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	6–13	-0.06	24%	14 Oct →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	32%	14 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.09	24%	14 Oct →
cache	8–13	0.01	29%	13 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.03	15%	13 Oct →
mirage	16–12	-0.00	14%	13 Oct →
inferno	13–16	0.04	30%	12 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.05	8%	12 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.02	16%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–2	0.14	35%	12 Oct →
nuke	13–5	0.02	22%	12 Oct →
ancient	14–16	0.00	26%	12 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	12%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.06	18%	11 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	25%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.03	30%	10 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.06	20%	10 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.00	26%	9 Oct →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	20%	9 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.15	25%	9 Oct →
ancient	13–4	0.07	12%	9 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	16%	9 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.08	24%	8 Oct →
anubis	13–11	0.02	21%	8 Oct →
ancient	10–13	0.03	16%	8 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	26%	6 Oct →
inferno	13–16	0.02	14%	2 Oct →
ancient	10–13	0.01	12%	2 Oct →
nuke	13–9	0.12	29%	2 Oct →
ancient	15–15	0.02	15%	1 Oct →
anubis	13–8	0.06	18%	1 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.03	17%	1 Oct →
anubis	13–9	0.02	35%	1 Oct →
dust2	16–13	-0.03	24%	30 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.05	34%	30 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.12	13%	30 Sept →
dust2	6–13	0.01	22%	30 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.05	19%	30 Sept →
ancient	7–13	0.04	25%	29 Sept →
dust2	15–15	0.05	17%	29 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	19%	29 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	28%	29 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.03	11%	29 Sept →
ancient	16–14	-0.00	20%	28 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.00	9%	28 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.01	19%	28 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	9%	28 Sept →
anubis	8–13	0.12	35%	28 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.04	17%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.03	20%	27 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.01	16%	27 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.06	23%	27 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	22%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.01	24%	27 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.05	22%	26 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	15%	23 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.01	12%	23 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.07	26%	21 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.08	36%	21 Sept →
cache	3–13	-0.09	19%	21 Sept →
cache	14–16	0.06	25%	19 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.16	33%	19 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.09	19%	19 Sept →
cache	12–16	0.02	19%	17 Sept →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	23%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.03	14%	17 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	17%	17 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.03	20%	16 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.03	27%	16 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.03	24%	16 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.12	31%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	20%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–1	0.09	25%	15 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.01	19%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.02	20%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.07	26%	14 Sept →
cache	3–13	-0.02	27%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.11	21%	14 Sept →
anubis	14–16	-0.02	15%	10 Sept →
inferno	2–13	-0.02	18%	10 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.01	25%	10 Sept →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	20%	6 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.04	22%	6 Sept →
dust2	12–16	0.04	20%	4 Sept →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	18%	4 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.06	19%	3 Sept →
inferno	13–3	-0.06	10%	3 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.04	23%	3 Sept →
inferno	9–3	0.11	38%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.10	28%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.03	16%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	22%	28 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.08	42%	28 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	23%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.00	27%	28 Aug →
vertigo	7–4	-0.06	21%	28 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.07	24%	27 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	27%	15 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.01	23%	15 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	24%	15 Aug →