bil

bil — CS2 Stats

76561197965345568[U:1:5079840]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

727Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,412Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,153Top 10% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17846 of 232823 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,153 → 25,153
0Faceit ELO · 1,669 → 1,669
+1Tracked matches · now 727
0.0ppWin rate · 36.7% → 36.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 26 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,153 -440 26 May6 Sept · 22 days played
24,99926,317peak 26,31726 May6 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,669 +0 31 Aug6 Sept · 3 observations
1,6691,669peak 1,66931 Aug6 Sept
26,472Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,669Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-05-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,669
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 82 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,164 below peak (26,317)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,132 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,847 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,982), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate55.1%49.2%50.3%above
Shot accuracy10.8%13.4%11.5%0.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.901.121.180.28 short
Match win rate44.7%48.5%52.0%7.3% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbilPREMIER25,153 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,669csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning66
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.7
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.6
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time515ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 4 Jun
54%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · anubis, 18 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · anubis, 6 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 25 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2213959%0.02
ancientB22111150%0.01
mirageB21101148%0.01
anubisA169756%0.03
infernoD82625%0.03
nukeC52340%0.00
cacheA53260%-0.02
overpass1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,047Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
4,298Matches
44.7%Match win rate
55.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Red band
10.8%Shot accuracy
4,439MVPs
1,119Hours (in match)
1,057Bombs planted
554Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,249dust2
1,965inferno
1,194nuke
518train
349vertigo
205cbble
49ar_baggage
48assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

415Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
86.6ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8949%1.1516.4
Dust26560%1.2017.8
Inferno5845%1.0516.8
Ancient5459%1.3119.6
Anubis4648%1.2218.6
Nuke3842%1.1617.3
Train2365%1.3618.9
Vertigo1650%1.2318.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
520msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.28HE damage / grenade
19.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.7858% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–130.0315%21 Aug
dust213–110.0411%19 Aug
ancient13–90.0118%19 Aug
anubis10–130.0017%14 Aug
ancient14–160.0115%14 Aug
anubis11–130.0027%12 Aug
mirage13–10.1421%12 Aug
anubis13–110.0111%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0016%9 Aug
mirage13–110.0235%9 Aug
anubis28–310.0021%7 Aug
inferno13–40.1516%7 Aug
ancient19–170.0322%7 Aug
inferno7–130.0026%6 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0220%6 Aug
anubis3–00.0933%6 Aug
inferno11–130.0324%6 Aug
dust213–7-0.0226%6 Aug
anubis5–13-0.018%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0316%6 Aug
inferno7–130.0026%31 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0223%29 Jul
cache6–13-0.0219%24 Jul
inferno13–80.1023%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0110%24 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0323%19 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0820%19 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0221%19 Jul
dust20–13-0.0424%18 Jul
mirage6–130.0020%18 Jul
anubis0–13-0.0054%18 Jul
dust213–110.0422%18 Jul
ancient22–200.0115%15 Jul
mirage8–130.0425%15 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0515%14 Jul
mirage13–50.0517%14 Jul
anubis5–130.0023%14 Jul
anubis11–130.0318%14 Jul
dust213–40.0124%14 Jul
mirage13–40.007%14 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0514%14 Jul
dust213–2-0.0120%14 Jul
dust213–50.0225%13 Jul
cache13–2-0.0417%13 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0217%12 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0738%12 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0413%10 Jul
cache13–90.0120%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0233%9 Jul
mirage6–130.0330%9 Jul
ancient13–40.1417%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.0530%9 Jul
mirage13–60.0315%8 Jul
mirage13–50.1219%7 Jul
anubis13–80.0721%1 Jul
anubis13–30.1032%1 Jul
dust24–13-0.0521%27 Jun
nuke11–130.0627%27 Jun
dust29–130.0525%26 Jun
inferno10–130.0119%26 Jun
dust213–70.0917%26 Jun
ancient10–130.0713%25 Jun
mirage13–0-0.0140%25 Jun
dust213–10-0.0614%25 Jun
mirage8–130.0314%25 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0220%23 Jun
dust27–130.0235%23 Jun
ancient2–13-0.1022%17 Jun
cache13–100.0119%12 Jun
mirage10–130.0028%11 Jun
dust213–100.0315%11 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0521%11 Jun
ancient13–100.0316%10 Jun
dust213–50.0517%7 Jun
dust213–10.060%7 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0113%7 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0116%7 Jun
dust211–130.0528%7 Jun
ancient13–40.1215%7 Jun
ancient14–160.0125%7 Jun
mirage13–100.0021%6 Jun
nuke13–100.0333%5 Jun
anubis13–90.1624%4 Jun
ancient8–130.0515%4 Jun
mirage21–25-0.0119%4 Jun
cache9–13-0.0615%4 Jun
dust214–160.0521%3 Jun
dust213–80.0224%2 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0424%2 Jun
anubis16–140.0131%1 Jun
dust28–13-0.0616%1 Jun
ancient13–30.0627%1 Jun
anubis13–70.0112%1 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0730%30 May
dust29–130.0023%30 May
ancient9–130.0121%30 May
mirage13–11-0.0324%28 May
anubis13–10-0.0020%28 May
dust213–30.1216%28 May
overpass15–150.0219%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →