llinkis

llinkis — CS2 Stats

76561197965340455[U:1:5074727]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,901Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,933Purple band · top ~24.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,202 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,933 -767 3 Jul – 31 Oct · 35 days played
15,62920,646peak 20,6463 Jul31 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,202 +0 31 Aug – 15 Sept · 3 observations
1,2021,202peak 1,20231 Aug15 Sept
20,867Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,202Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,202
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 149 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,713 below peak (20,646)
  • -2,353 over 30 days · declining
  • -3,948 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,067 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGllinkisFACEITLevel 5 · 1,202 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,933 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,202csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning33
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateWWWLLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility6.0
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 32% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning3.3
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time523ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy10.4%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 11.4% → last ⅓ avg 10.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 6 Oct →
27%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 14 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 18 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18dust2Weakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2010–1050%-0.00
mirageC198–1142%-0.01
infernoA1811–761%-0.01
anubisC135–838%-0.02
nukeB126–650%-0.01
cacheC94–544%-0.00
dust2D60–60%-0.05
vertigo—21–150%-0.02
italy—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

742Matches
48%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
74.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15747%1.0114.9
Inferno11456%1.0915.4
Ancient10946%0.9914.4
Dust210848%1.0113.9
Anubis10051%0.9714.8
Nuke8146%1.0515.0
Cache2948%0.9813.7
Vertigo1127%0.6410.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.3%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
519msReaction time
15.7%T opening success
32.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
7.70HE damage / grenade
9.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.3348% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.7321% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0110%31 Oct →
cache13–60.0211%30 Oct →
inferno13–110.035%29 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0410%27 Oct →
mirage11–130.0011%23 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.057%19 Oct →
ancient10–130.0611%19 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.007%17 Oct →
cache9–13-0.008%17 Oct →
italy12–12-0.0121%16 Oct →
mirage13–80.027%16 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.088%16 Oct →
dust26–13-0.052%16 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.034%14 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0516%13 Oct →
inferno9–70.1117%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0115%10 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0122%9 Oct →
ancient13–20.066%9 Oct →
ancient13–40.1211%6 Oct →
vertigo13–4-0.0312%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.017%5 Oct →
cache13–4-0.009%5 Oct →
ancient13–40.083%5 Oct →
cache6–130.0117%3 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0310%2 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0517%2 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0012%2 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.034%1 Oct →
mirage13–70.008%25 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0118%25 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.067%24 Sept →
inferno4–130.0410%24 Sept →
ancient13–40.009%23 Sept →
nuke13–20.048%23 Sept →
ancient5–130.0310%21 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0714%19 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0410%19 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0612%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0512%17 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0714%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.0313%6 Sept →
inferno13–110.028%6 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.054%6 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0216%4 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.027%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0413%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.012%3 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0315%31 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0214%31 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.043%31 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0015%31 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0420%28 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.049%27 Aug →
mirage8–130.0114%27 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0211%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0414%23 Aug →
nuke16–140.0213%22 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.018%19 Aug →
vertigo5–13-0.0221%18 Aug →
inferno13–40.024%15 Aug →
nuke9–130.0114%31 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0314%29 Jul →
ancient11–130.0410%24 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.1111%24 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.043%21 Jul →
inferno13–100.0414%21 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0515%18 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0510%18 Jul →
ancient13–10.015%18 Jul →
cache14–160.0114%15 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0618%15 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.066%15 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.069%15 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0215%14 Jul →
nuke9–130.0013%14 Jul →
mirage4–130.0315%14 Jul →
anubis13–70.076%14 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0527%14 Jul →
nuke13–100.038%13 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.055%13 Jul →
cache16–130.0210%12 Jul →
anubis13–50.0212%12 Jul →
mirage13–100.0411%11 Jul →
cache13–70.0124%11 Jul →
dust210–13-0.028%10 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0616%9 Jul →
mirage13–100.024%9 Jul →
inferno8–130.0113%7 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0511%6 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.063%6 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0314%6 Jul →
inferno13–100.0017%5 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0612%4 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.085%4 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.049%4 Jul →
anubis5–130.0014%4 Jul →
nuke13–100.026%4 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0414%4 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.018%3 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.