t0mmmm1

t0mmmm1 — CS2 Stats

NL76561197965132922[U:1:4867194]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,183Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,076Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 1,183
0.0ppWin rate · 64.3% → 64.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,590 -2,774 18 Mar – 1 Jul · 21 days played
20,70224,364peak 24,36418 Mar1 Jul
24,737Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-03-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches7——
Win rate29%——
K/D1.18——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning61
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–40–6Last 10054%Win rateLWWWLTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning6.1
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time611ms−0ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–11 · inferno, 19 Aug →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · anubis, 28 Jul →
484msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 27 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 29 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 82% over 11nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB189–950%-0.03
infernoA169–756%0.02
anubisA1610–663%0.02
mirageC146–843%-0.01
nukeD124–833%-0.02
cacheS119–282%0.02
dust2B84–450%-0.02
overpassA53–260%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

128,972Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
6,063Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
37.4%Headshot %
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
14,305MVPs
3,076Hours (in match)
6,881Bombs planted
1,890Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,464
AWP21,141
Knife3,127
P2502,481
MAC-101,753

Lifetime map wins

12,918inferno
8,303dust2
3,539nuke
2,846cbble
2,641train
731vertigo
40safehouse
36assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,532Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
73.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5761%1.0115.2
Ancient4850%0.9415.3
Inferno4439%0.8914.3
Mirage3546%1.0914.6
Nuke1759%1.0915.1
Dust21145%0.8815.1
Cache1050%0.7512.2
Overpass683%0.9114.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
73.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
621msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
11.43HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.4731% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.046%24 Aug →
mirage13–90.0021%20 Aug →
cache13–60.0820%19 Aug →
inferno13–110.1315%19 Aug →
inferno9–130.0527%16 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0223%15 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0112%11 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.093%11 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0427%10 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0211%10 Aug →
ancient13–80.0411%10 Aug →
inferno13–50.0527%6 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0110%31 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0522%30 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0534%28 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0116%28 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0915%27 Jul →
anubis13–60.0414%27 Jul →
anubis13–90.068%24 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0419%22 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0313%22 Jul →
ancient13–70.0626%22 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0632%20 Jul →
anubis13–70.027%1 Jul →
overpass13–60.0316%20 Jun →
cache13–9-0.0216%20 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0320%20 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0413%20 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0514%20 Jun →
inferno13–70.0411%20 Jun →
anubis13–80.0412%19 Jun →
inferno13–20.0811%19 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.1017%19 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0022%19 Jun →
ancient13–70.0517%19 Jun →
anubis13–100.0225%19 Jun →
nuke9–130.0220%19 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0421%19 Jun →
anubis13–10.0818%29 May →
anubis12–120.0220%29 May →
dust216–13-0.0127%25 May →
overpass15–15-0.069%19 May →
mirage10–13-0.0612%19 May →
anubis13–80.0313%19 May →
ancient7–13-0.0421%14 May →
nuke13–80.0519%14 May →
nuke5–8-0.0010%13 May →
overpass6–13-0.1019%13 May →
ancient13–110.0220%13 May →
anubis13–70.0621%13 May →
ancient13–10-0.068%6 May →
anubis11–13-0.0611%6 May →
mirage8–130.0317%5 May →
ancient13–9-0.0316%5 May →
ancient9–13-0.0711%5 May →
nuke13–7-0.049%1 May →
dust213–90.0634%1 May →
cache11–13-0.0115%30 Apr →
cache13–10-0.0016%30 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0319%29 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0115%29 Apr →
cache13–9-0.0120%29 Apr →
cache13–40.0216%29 Apr →
cache13–70.0517%29 Apr →
cache13–50.0913%29 Apr →
cache3–13-0.039%29 Apr →
cache13–90.0816%29 Apr →
inferno13–110.0927%28 Apr →
overpass13–90.0820%28 Apr →
inferno13–80.0615%28 Apr →
mirage3–130.0120%28 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0518%23 Apr →
dust215–15-0.0120%22 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0515%22 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0419%21 Apr →
mirage13–110.0613%21 Apr →
inferno13–60.0025%21 Apr →
mirage13–10.0721%15 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0218%13 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0414%13 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.049%13 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0429%8 Apr →
inferno13–90.0318%8 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.1117%8 Apr →
ancient15–150.0121%7 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0422%7 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0622%2 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.1017%2 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0724%2 Apr →
anubis1–130.0116%2 Apr →
anubis13–30.1116%2 Apr →
mirage4–130.0019%29 Mar →
anubis4–130.0213%26 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0125%23 Mar →
overpass13–60.0324%23 Mar →
mirage5–130.0216%23 Mar →
inferno13–70.0827%23 Mar →
mirage16–140.0118%18 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.049%18 Mar →
ancient2–13-0.084%18 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.