Kane

Kane — CS2 Stats

LV76561197962763219[U:1:2497491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

870Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
672Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,706Top 25% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35184 of 257841 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (39 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 870 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,706 +1,649 31 Jan – 18 Sept · 29 days played
22,05727,362peak 27,36231 Jan18 Sept
27,481Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-01-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,656 below peak (27,362)
  • -803 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,294 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate48.4%46.9%49.3%meets
Shot accuracy10.3%13.0%13.4%3.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.321.081.12above
Match win rate54.8%46.7%48.5%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKanePREMIER23,706 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning50
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateWLTLTLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–2–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility6.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.5

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time538ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 6 Feb →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–2 · overpass, 17 Feb →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 31 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 1 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 19mirageWeakest map · 46% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2612–1446%-0.00
dust2A1912–763%0.01
infernoA1912–763%0.03
ancientA106–460%0.03
anubisB105–550%0.02
nukeB84–450%0.00
overpassA74–357%0.02
cache—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 26). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,895Lifetime kills
1.32K/D · Top 25% of Pink band
1,491Matches
54.8%Match win rate · Top 10% of Pink band
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
10.3%Shot accuracy
5,677MVPs
672Hours (in match)
1,058Bombs planted
503Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,851
AWP3,616
Molotov2,799
MP91,026
P90557

Lifetime map wins

3,020inferno
2,692dust2
1,512nuke
921vertigo
775train
107italy
103office
39cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
42.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.4%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
533msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
11.03HE damage / grenade
8.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0611% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–120.0112%8 Sept →
dust24–13-0.039%8 Sept →
inferno15–150.0022%8 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0432%16 Aug →
ancient15–150.0511%16 Aug →
mirage14–160.0114%16 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0416%31 Jul →
mirage4–130.0229%31 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0314%31 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0011%28 Jul →
mirage13–90.0323%28 Jul →
inferno13–50.1018%28 Jul →
dust213–100.0126%24 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0019%24 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0519%24 Jul →
ancient6–130.0229%23 Jul →
inferno13–90.0117%23 Jul →
mirage13–110.0819%23 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0219%23 Jul →
dust213–50.0223%23 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0514%23 Jul →
dust213–80.0221%21 Jul →
ancient16–120.0717%21 Jul →
anubis5–130.0111%20 Jul →
dust28–130.0314%20 Jul →
inferno8–130.0310%12 Mar →
dust22–13-0.0917%12 Mar →
overpass11–130.0212%7 Mar →
anubis4–130.0522%4 Mar →
inferno9–130.0615%4 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0623%4 Mar →
mirage7–130.0931%3 Mar →
inferno13–70.0415%2 Mar →
inferno13–40.0417%1 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0711%1 Mar →
ancient13–90.0716%1 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.058%1 Mar →
inferno13–10.1017%1 Mar →
inferno14–160.0419%1 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0113%1 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.035%1 Mar →
nuke16–140.1214%1 Mar →
mirage13–110.0515%28 Feb →
dust216–140.0123%28 Feb →
ancient7–130.028%28 Feb →
ancient13–80.0521%28 Feb →
overpass3–13-0.0225%24 Feb →
nuke7–130.0126%23 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0424%23 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0614%23 Feb →
inferno13–50.0515%23 Feb →
nuke16–12-0.0320%23 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0021%23 Feb →
nuke3–13-0.0514%22 Feb →
overpass5–130.0324%22 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0310%22 Feb →
inferno16–12-0.0219%22 Feb →
inferno8–130.0113%22 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0611%22 Feb →
overpass13–30.0723%21 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0031%21 Feb →
anubis13–80.0122%21 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0023%20 Feb →
dust213–60.039%20 Feb →
ancient10–130.0615%20 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0425%18 Feb →
mirage13–90.0116%18 Feb →
mirage13–40.0713%18 Feb →
anubis13–50.0416%18 Feb →
dust213–3-0.0113%18 Feb →
mirage9–1-0.0313%18 Feb →
anubis9–130.0115%18 Feb →
mirage0–13-0.1011%18 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0111%17 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0114%17 Feb →
dust213–6-0.0217%17 Feb →
overpass6–2-0.0250%17 Feb →
nuke0–6-0.0127%16 Feb →
ancient13–90.0313%14 Feb →
overpass13–20.0130%14 Feb →
mirage8–130.0123%13 Feb →
mirage13–20.0718%12 Feb →
inferno4–13-0.0323%9 Feb →
mirage6–130.0143%9 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0129%9 Feb →
dust213–80.0633%9 Feb →
anubis15–150.0718%9 Feb →
overpass13–110.0616%6 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0012%6 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0120%6 Feb →
dust213–60.1128%6 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0218%6 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0227%6 Feb →
inferno13–10.1324%6 Feb →
dust212–160.0229%6 Feb →
inferno13–40.0223%5 Feb →
dust213–30.0929%5 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0424%5 Feb →
nuke13–40.0820%31 Jan →
anubis13–60.0920%31 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.