Señor Milny

Señor Milny — CS2 Stats

GB76561197961219517[U:1:953789]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,398Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,139Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,837 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (53 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,837 → 1,837
+86Tracked matches · now 2,398
−6.7ppWin rate · 60.0% → 53.3%

Rating over time

1,837Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2026-06-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,837
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 164 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate33.3%48.2%50.9%17.6% short
Shot accuracy16.3%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.191.071.09above
Match win rate47.6%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSeñor MilnyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,837 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,837csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning66
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–40–1Last 10059%Win rateLWLWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +7.9pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility6.6
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning6.6
Utility6.6
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time541ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 6 Aug →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · cache, 20 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 16 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 6 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
13–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 33ancientWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS3322–1167%0.03
mirageA2514–1156%0.01
cacheA2415–963%0.02
ancientC146–843%0.00
dust2—21–150%-0.01
overpass—21–150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

164,554Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
5,772Matches
47.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
33.3%Headshot %
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
17,636MVPs
3,547Hours (in match)
9,083Bombs planted
1,966Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP50,273
AK-4734,109
P25011,010
Knife4,038
MP73,567
Tec-92,892

Lifetime map wins

23,125inferno
8,407dust2
4,016train
1,854nuke
273cbble
105vertigo
25italy
18office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,026Matches
50%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
82.9ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage38544%1.2017.3
Inferno34859%1.3418.3
Ancient11646%1.2218.3
Cache9255%1.3718.8
Overpass8146%1.2218.3
Train7054%1.3718.1
Anubis4240%1.0517.6
Dust22938%1.0916.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
544msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
55.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
10.86HE damage / grenade
10.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9478% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0024%31 Oct →
cache16–120.017%27 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0312%27 Oct →
inferno13–110.0734%16 Oct →
mirage13–20.0624%16 Oct →
inferno7–130.0018%16 Oct →
ancient16–130.0424%15 Oct →
cache13–40.0626%14 Oct →
mirage8–130.0113%1 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0724%27 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0216%26 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0317%24 Sept →
inferno13–110.0915%21 Sept →
cache8–130.0414%20 Sept →
inferno13–60.048%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0113%16 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.066%14 Sept →
cache13–110.0512%11 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0014%10 Sept →
inferno8–130.0112%9 Sept →
cache16–140.0016%8 Sept →
ancient0–130.0425%6 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.039%6 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0430%6 Sept →
cache8–130.038%5 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.038%5 Sept →
cache16–12-0.0314%5 Sept →
inferno13–30.0715%5 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0317%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.0015%4 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.027%3 Sept →
inferno20–220.0723%3 Sept →
mirage11–130.0511%2 Sept →
mirage13–90.0412%31 Aug →
mirage13–70.0829%30 Aug →
ancient19–160.0412%30 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0017%28 Aug →
cache22–190.0414%28 Aug →
cache13–40.0412%27 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0027%27 Aug →
mirage13–100.0322%23 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0123%21 Aug →
inferno13–100.0513%21 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0239%20 Aug →
cache13–80.0219%19 Aug →
inferno13–70.0114%16 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0123%16 Aug →
ancient7–130.0518%16 Aug →
mirage13–110.0213%8 Aug →
ancient13–90.0111%7 Aug →
mirage13–110.0817%7 Aug →
mirage5–130.0414%6 Aug →
inferno13–60.1110%6 Aug →
cache13–70.0118%6 Aug →
inferno13–10.1424%6 Aug →
inferno11–130.0611%5 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0124%5 Aug →
cache13–70.0815%4 Aug →
inferno13–70.0415%3 Aug →
cache20–220.0816%30 Jul →
cache13–60.0418%30 Jul →
inferno13–50.0132%28 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0015%28 Jul →
inferno16–140.0426%27 Jul →
inferno22–190.0018%26 Jul →
cache13–60.0212%25 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0118%24 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0213%23 Jul →
inferno6–130.0221%23 Jul →
inferno13–60.097%21 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0011%18 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0414%18 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0522%17 Jul →
inferno19–160.0018%17 Jul →
mirage13–110.0213%16 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0118%16 Jul →
mirage16–140.0121%15 Jul →
inferno13–80.0318%12 Jul →
inferno13–50.1018%12 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0517%10 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0211%8 Jul →
inferno13–60.0021%8 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.029%7 Jul →
inferno13–90.0317%6 Jul →
mirage13–100.0719%6 Jul →
cache13–40.0610%5 Jul →
cache12–12-0.017%2 Jul →
inferno13–90.0211%1 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.018%1 Jul →
overpass8–13-0.044%29 Jun →
overpass19–15-0.0311%29 Jun →
inferno13–80.0813%28 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0711%28 Jun →
cache16–14-0.0011%27 Jun →
mirage11–130.0321%26 Jun →
cache10–130.0522%26 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0326%25 Jun →
inferno12–16-0.0129%25 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0725%25 Jun →
mirage13–80.1224%22 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.