nawigat0r! :>

nawigat0r! :> — CS2 Stats

76561197961124043[U:1:858315]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,279Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,389Hours in CS70Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating12,571Blue band · top ~41.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,149 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,571 -4,248 3 Aug – 29 Sept · 20 days played
12,54517,255peak 17,2553 Aug29 Sept
17,260Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,149Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-07-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,149
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 52 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,684 below peak (17,255)
  • -3,699 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,429 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches171——
Win rate42%——
K/D0.79——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 31 Aug 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,989), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate44.2%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.3%11.3%12.0%11.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.810.991.020.21 short
Match win rate46.4%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnawigat0r! :>FACEITLevel 4 · 1,149 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,571 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,149csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning41
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateLWWLWTWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 772ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 763ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 720ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim4.4
Utility6.5
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 690ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning4.1
Utility6.5
Mechanics2.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time672ms+46ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 672ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+6.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 24 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 16 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · cache, 18 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · train, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC176–1135%-0.01
mirageB178–947%-0.02
infernoS1410–471%-0.02
dust2S139–469%-0.03
cacheA127–558%-0.03
ancientB115–645%-0.02
nukeD102–820%-0.04
vertigo—30–30%-0.05
train—22–0100%-0.01
office—11–0100%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,722Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
3,993Matches
46.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
44.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
0.3%Shot accuracy
7,900MVPs
1,674Hours (in match)
5,089Bombs planted
858Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,835
AWP5,499
Tec-93,964
FAMAS1,675
MP71,467
MP91,185

Lifetime map wins

8,631dust2
4,925nuke
4,499inferno
803train
738vertigo
138italy
39office
2dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,383Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
70.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage34349%0.8612.9
Dust228251%0.9214.2
Nuke19555%0.8713.7
Anubis18651%0.9013.6
Ancient17545%0.8613.0
Inferno12951%0.8813.6
Cache2857%0.7912.4
Train1953%0.7412.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
59.2%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
690msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
10.81HE damage / grenade
16.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.0463% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–130.0728%29 Sept →
cache13–50.0123%29 Sept →
anubis13–40.1226%29 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0617%29 Sept →
train13–7-0.0124%29 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0721%29 Sept →
office13–6-0.1131%29 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0823%29 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.1133%28 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0525%28 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0940%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0435%28 Sept →
anubis13–60.0518%28 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0422%25 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0418%25 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0331%25 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0516%25 Sept →
cache9–13-0.115%25 Sept →
train13–0-0.0231%25 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0521%25 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0520%24 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0316%24 Sept →
mirage13–70.1318%24 Sept →
anubis9–130.0217%24 Sept →
anubis6–130.0127%23 Sept →
dust213–110.0120%22 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0417%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.1020%19 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.075%19 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0232%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0520%19 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0222%18 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0326%16 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0029%16 Sept →
cache22–20-0.0527%16 Sept →
nuke13–50.0044%16 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0233%16 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0428%16 Sept →
dust214–160.0438%11 Sept →
mirage13–70.029%11 Sept →
inferno13–100.0113%11 Sept →
ancient9–130.0110%9 Sept →
anubis16–140.0117%9 Sept →
inferno13–80.0617%8 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0510%8 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0225%8 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0121%8 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0611%8 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.1311%8 Sept →
inferno13–60.0236%7 Sept →
cache13–40.0113%7 Sept →
mirage16–130.0523%7 Sept →
dust213–9-0.008%7 Sept →
inferno13–100.0216%7 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0432%5 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0612%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0418%5 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0313%5 Sept →
ancient13–40.0513%5 Sept →
cache10–130.0121%5 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0110%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0015%4 Sept →
nuke16–19-0.0917%4 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.1329%3 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0413%2 Sept →
ancient16–130.0316%14 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0411%13 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0121%11 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0111%10 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.045%8 Aug →
inferno13–20.0918%7 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0310%7 Aug →
anubis13–60.0417%7 Aug →
dust219–17-0.0223%7 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0111%7 Aug →
vertigo8–13-0.0331%7 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0212%7 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0512%6 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.064%4 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0331%4 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0417%4 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0331%4 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0619%4 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.068%3 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0515%3 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0324%3 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0117%3 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0511%3 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0412%3 Aug →
cache13–10-0.077%30 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.034%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0012%30 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0517%30 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0424%30 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0717%30 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0717%30 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0224%30 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.070%30 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0532%30 Jul →
cache13–60.0631%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.