moere

moere — CS2 Stats

DE76561197960819055[U:1:553327]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,277Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,528Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,465Purple band · top ~22.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,686 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (33 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,465 +1,345 9 Nov – 27 Sept · 29 days played
13,69817,499peak 17,4999 Nov27 Sept
17,499Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,686Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2025-11-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,686
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 65 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,034 below peak (17,499)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,535 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.8%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy13.4%13.0%13.2%meets
Kill/death ratio1.201.061.07above
Match win rate47.4%46.3%46.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmoereFACEITLevel 8 · 1,686 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER16,465 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,686csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning46
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–44Last 10056%Win rateLLWLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 708ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 687ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility7.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.6

Excellent counter-strafingStrong T-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 700ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.6
Utility7.3
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time697ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 706ms → last ⅓ avg 697ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 27 Nov →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 28 Nov →
508msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 23 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 20 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS3120–1165%0.00
dust2B199–1047%0.02
nukeA1810–856%0.01
ancientS119–282%0.00
mirageA85–363%-0.01
anubisD72–529%-0.02
overpass—30–30%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.19
cache—10–10%0.02
train—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

139,810Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
4,475Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
51.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15,652MVPs
2,528Hours (in match)
7,298Bombs planted
1,612Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4751,876
AWP14,785
P2504,154
Knife2,038
HE Grenade1,821

Lifetime map wins

8,500inferno
6,330dust2
4,284nuke
2,325vertigo
1,014cbble
881train
209aztec
209dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

738Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6752%1.1216.3
Anubis3751%1.0415.2
Nuke3462%1.2415.6
Ancient3139%0.9014.6
Mirage1861%0.9914.4
Dust21354%0.9714.0
Vertigo850%1.1917.1
Overpass333%0.9516.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
700msReaction time
44.6%T opening success
32.6%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
10.14HE damage / grenade
19.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 700.2921ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.5954% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0520%27 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0221%15 Sept →
mirage13–80.0920%15 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0326%15 Sept →
nuke13–50.0520%13 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.1910%9 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0124%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.0220%27 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0222%27 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0228%26 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0614%26 Aug →
dust213–30.0110%26 Aug →
cache14–160.0213%25 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0533%25 Aug →
dust213–5-0.019%23 Aug →
anubis10–130.0417%23 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.1115%23 Aug →
ancient13–40.0710%23 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0326%14 Aug →
inferno10–130.0116%14 Aug →
inferno13–60.0324%3 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0120%30 Jan →
inferno14–16-0.0715%30 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0417%30 Jan →
ancient13–110.0418%30 Jan →
inferno13–80.0130%28 Jan →
inferno13–70.0214%27 Jan →
ancient13–70.0216%27 Jan →
dust29–130.0211%27 Jan →
nuke13–6-0.0212%27 Jan →
ancient13–90.0826%27 Jan →
anubis13–6-0.0410%27 Jan →
mirage12–16-0.0525%26 Jan →
inferno1–80.0225%24 Jan →
anubis3–13-0.0223%24 Jan →
inferno13–80.0027%24 Jan →
dust211–13-0.0518%22 Jan →
nuke13–70.0923%22 Jan →
anubis13–7-0.069%22 Jan →
inferno14–160.0218%20 Jan →
anubis11–130.0010%19 Jan →
nuke11–13-0.0121%12 Jan →
ancient13–50.0025%12 Jan →
anubis9–13-0.0121%11 Jan →
anubis12–16-0.0421%11 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0324%9 Jan →
overpass8–130.0115%8 Jan →
inferno13–70.0329%8 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.0528%4 Jan →
nuke16–120.0722%4 Jan →
dust24–130.0114%4 Jan →
nuke11–13-0.0413%1 Jan →
dust22–13-0.0116%1 Jan →
inferno13–6-0.0024%29 Dec →
nuke8–13-0.0924%29 Dec →
inferno13–100.0122%29 Dec →
inferno13–70.0713%28 Dec →
inferno13–50.0617%18 Dec →
inferno3–130.0125%18 Dec →
inferno13–80.0017%18 Dec →
nuke13–8-0.0737%17 Dec →
nuke13–40.035%17 Dec →
overpass5–130.0016%15 Dec →
inferno6–13-0.0211%15 Dec →
inferno13–70.0016%15 Dec →
dust213–7-0.0021%14 Dec →
train13–50.0833%14 Dec →
mirage13–9-0.0012%12 Dec →
mirage13–8-0.0120%11 Dec →
inferno13–110.0121%11 Dec →
dust211–13-0.0116%3 Dec →
inferno16–130.0724%3 Dec →
dust211–13-0.0017%30 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0519%30 Nov →
nuke2–13-0.0322%29 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0626%29 Nov →
nuke13–70.1029%29 Nov →
dust213–40.0531%29 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0442%28 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0312%28 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.058%28 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0814%28 Nov →
dust213–100.0413%27 Nov →
nuke13–30.1910%27 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.0216%27 Nov →
overpass6–13-0.0812%26 Nov →
dust213–90.0828%26 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0124%23 Nov →
ancient13–100.0219%23 Nov →
dust213–20.1338%20 Nov →
nuke14–160.0121%16 Nov →
inferno16–140.0217%16 Nov →
inferno13–50.1425%16 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0214%14 Nov →
ancient13–50.0016%14 Nov →
nuke13–50.0429%14 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0213%14 Nov →
dust213–40.0623%9 Nov →
dust213–90.1415%9 Nov →
ancient1–13-0.1110%9 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.