OHKAY — CS2 Stats

76561197960406155[U:1:140427]✓ No bans

2,154Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,435Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,799Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#984 of 7981 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,215 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

25,799Peak Premier on CSDB

2,215Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,215
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 285 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,799
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,201 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	41.8%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	5.8%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.19	1.08
Match win rate	41.9%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning56

Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateLLWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression6.6

Utility7.5

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.6

Utility7.5

Mechanics6.6

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time498ms−64ms

first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 498ms

Headshot accuracy15.6%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–8

13–2Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 47% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	29	16–13	55%	0.05
mirage	A	21	13–8	62%	0.04
inferno	B	17	8–9	47%	0.02
ancient	A	14	9–5	64%	0.05
anubis	S	6	5–1	83%	0.07
cache	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.01
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,131Lifetime kills

1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

5,341Matches

41.9%Match win rate

41.8%Headshot %

5.8%Shot accuracy

12,473MVPs

1,366Hours (in match)

4,229Bombs planted

938Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,743

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,439

Desert Eagle4,956

AWP4,470

P2000 / USP-S4,247

Glock-182,865

Galil AR2,762

MP91,728

Tec-91,537

P2501,502

Lifetime map wins

20,649dust2

5,909inferno

3,094nuke

2,525vertigo

888cbble

627train

93dust

60office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

881Matches

52%Win rate

1.37Avg K/D

96.0ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

32%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	161	47%	1.31	18.9
Inferno	131	60%	1.36	18.3
Dust2	121	51%	1.35	19.6
Ancient	97	48%	1.27	18.7
Vertigo	85	49%	1.47	20.4
Nuke	70	51%	1.52	20.3
Anubis	54	52%	1.35	18.1
Overpass	40	55%	1.53	19.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy

38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.9%Spray accuracy

79.9%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

489msReaction time

29.7%T opening success

47.3%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

12.70HE damage / grenade

16.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.6937% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	10–13	-0.00	14%	27 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	16%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	14%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	25%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.00	10%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.08	19%	23 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	14%	23 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.09	10%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	19%	21 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.03	13%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.08	11%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.08	21%	21 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.02	15%	20 Aug →
dust2	12–16	0.00	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.07	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	13%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.03	31%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	21%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.06	6%	15 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.00	7%	14 Aug →
dust2	22–18	0.04	10%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	20%	14 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	14%	14 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.05	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	29%	12 Aug →
vertigo	14–16	-0.00	10%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.06	9%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.06	13%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.07	17%	8 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	13%	8 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	9%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	12%	7 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.00	14%	5 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	22%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	13%	5 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.09	13%	5 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	14%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	29%	5 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.03	12%	5 Aug →
dust2	5–12	0.02	8%	5 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	8%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	8%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.08	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	19%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.06	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	20%	3 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	13%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	10%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	7%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.09	14%	2 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.03	11%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.07	19%	2 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	16%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	10%	2 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.06	11%	1 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.05	13%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	14%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.07	15%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.12	14%	31 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.08	25%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.03	8%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.16	18%	28 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.07	12%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.07	12%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.12	10%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	20%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.12	15%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.07	15%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.09	13%	22 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.08	13%	22 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.04	13%	22 Jul →
train	3–13	-0.03	7%	22 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.08	22%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.03	6%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.10	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	18%	18 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.06	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.07	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.02	11%	16 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.02	16%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.02	17%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.10	10%	15 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.03	18%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.10	7%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	14%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.17	19%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.06	11%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.05	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	14%	15 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	13%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	19%	14 Jul →
anubis	19–17	0.04	12%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.02	17%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.12	20%	14 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.06	18%	14 Jul →