Nepotism

Nepotism — CS2 Stats

76561197960378860[U:1:113132]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,191Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating4,896Grey band · top ~79.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,896 -357 30 Aug – 26 Sept · 19 days played
4,8966,712peak 6,71230 Aug26 Sept
6,827Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,816 below peak (6,712)
  • -357 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 104 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNepotismFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER4,896 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning42
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +122ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 744ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 756ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim3.3
Utility3.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch7.2

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 712ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning4.2
Utility3.4
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time707ms+53ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 707ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 5 Sept →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · mirage, 18 Sept →
430msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 12 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · cache, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 29ancientWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2918–1162%-0.02
mirageC146–843%-0.02
anubisD144–1029%-0.07
ancientD132–1115%-0.05
nukeD103–730%-0.05
infernoB105–550%-0.06
cacheC73–443%-0.05
office—20–20%-0.06
overpass—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches
61%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
61.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

56%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2967%0.8711.3
Anubis757%0.589.0
Inferno667%0.7711.3
Ancient540%0.6511.6
Cache367%0.9010.0
Mirage2100%0.7613.5
Nuke250%0.5010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
26.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.1%Spray accuracy
71.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
712msReaction time
63.3%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
8.46HE damage / grenade
1.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 712.3013ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.9087 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.7436% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–12-0.088%29 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0115%29 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0218%29 Sept →
cache3–13-0.1022%27 Sept →
mirage13–100.0123%27 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.015%27 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.1113%26 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0531%26 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0719%26 Sept →
mirage9–9-0.0219%26 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.1025%26 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.083%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0532%25 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0910%25 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0813%24 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0813%24 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0216%24 Sept →
mirage10–130.0014%23 Sept →
nuke7–130.019%23 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0813%22 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0632%22 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0220%22 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0926%22 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0919%21 Sept →
cache2–13-0.069%20 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0311%20 Sept →
dust213–50.0017%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0717%20 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0722%19 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.107%19 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0130%19 Sept →
dust20–13-0.050%19 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0315%19 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0122%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0214%19 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.115%19 Sept →
mirage5–00.0660%18 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0518%18 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0723%18 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0726%16 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0220%16 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0721%16 Sept →
dust213–50.0825%16 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0215%15 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0423%15 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0324%15 Sept →
dust212–120.0131%15 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0919%13 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0618%13 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0533%13 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0521%13 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0125%13 Sept →
mirage6–130.0219%13 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0513%13 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0913%12 Sept →
dust213–70.0126%12 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0323%12 Sept →
cache5–1-0.0025%12 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0819%12 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0640%12 Sept →
overpass13–6-0.0228%12 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.039%11 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0819%11 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0946%11 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0822%10 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0026%10 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0629%10 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0121%10 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0221%10 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0530%10 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.087%9 Sept →
mirage5–130.0630%8 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0310%8 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.074%5 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.057%5 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0521%5 Sept →
dust213–70.1026%5 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0735%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0819%5 Sept →
dust214–16-0.1130%4 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0729%4 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0921%4 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0714%4 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0228%2 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0231%2 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0419%2 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0926%2 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0416%2 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0410%2 Sept →
dust213–110.0519%2 Sept →
dust213–90.0329%2 Sept →
office12–12-0.0524%2 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0120%2 Sept →
office7–13-0.0618%2 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0128%2 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0220%2 Sept →
dust26–4-0.0425%31 Aug →
dust213–40.0212%31 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0913%31 Aug →
inferno13–100.0321%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.