oqmty — CS2 Stats

76561197960361596[U:1:95868]✓ No bans

2,704Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,958Purple band · top ~16.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15590 of 30440 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,617 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoqmtyFACEITLevel 10 · 2,617 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER17,958 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning64
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateWWLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression9.0
Utility6.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.9° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.4
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time576ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — cache 13–4
131Biggest win — cache
12Longest win streak
W2Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 76% over 17infernoWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB22101245%0.05
infernoC1871139%0.02
nukeS1713476%0.02
ancientA159660%0.05
cacheA117464%0.05
dust2A106460%0.04
overpass21150%-0.02
mirage21150%-0.01
train21150%0.07
fachwerk1010%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,748Matches
53%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
88.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient16854%1.1317.2
Anubis16353%1.2318.8
Inferno9656%1.1616.5
Nuke8163%1.1417.1
Train2040%1.1717.4
Dust21540%1.3118.1
Vertigo1250%1.8015.4
Cache1070%1.3825.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
42.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
578msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
60.0%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
18.6%Flash assists
13.54HE damage / grenade
7.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0247% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–120.0420%18 Aug
anubis16–130.0818%17 Aug
anubis9–130.0924%17 Aug
cache13–90.0837%17 Aug
nuke13–60.0219%17 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0811%13 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0115%13 Aug
fachwerk1–90.19100%11 Aug
cache13–30.0320%3 Aug
ancient13–70.0821%20 Jul
nuke7–130.0120%20 Jul
ancient9–130.0215%18 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0229%18 Jul
anubis9–130.0314%18 Jul
ancient13–90.1227%18 Jul
anubis14–160.0734%16 Jul
anubis8–130.029%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0226%16 Jul
dust213–110.1220%16 Jul
dust213–80.0335%13 Jul
anubis13–40.1125%13 Jul
cache13–40.2022%13 Jul
cache9–130.0219%13 Jul
dust211–130.0128%13 Jul
dust210–130.0617%9 Jul
inferno8–130.0218%9 Jul
overpass0–11-0.030%30 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0425%30 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0127%29 Jun
anubis15–150.0426%28 Jun
inferno13–60.1428%28 Jun
cache6–13-0.0421%27 Jun
ancient6–130.1224%27 Jun
anubis12–160.1019%27 Jun
dust213–110.1626%24 Jun
nuke13–60.1828%24 Jun
dust213–80.0335%24 Jun
anubis13–40.1128%24 Jun
nuke13–50.0113%4 Jun
nuke13–90.0830%31 May
cache12–120.1226%31 May
cache13–30.0950%31 May
cache8–130.0126%31 May
cache13–110.0221%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.0225%29 Apr
cache13–10.0720%29 Apr
anubis13–50.0218%29 Apr
nuke13–70.0023%25 Apr
inferno13–20.1524%17 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0316%9 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0135%5 Apr
ancient13–80.1417%29 Mar
nuke11–130.0419%27 Mar
inferno13–80.0427%21 Mar
anubis6–30.1732%21 Mar
inferno0–3-0.0017%21 Mar
anubis10–130.0125%21 Mar
anubis6–130.1019%18 Mar
inferno8–130.0339%18 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0316%13 Mar
anubis13–7-0.025%9 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0018%9 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0518%27 Feb
nuke16–120.0333%27 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0433%19 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0126%19 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0129%19 Feb
inferno11–130.0328%14 Feb
ancient13–40.0628%14 Feb
nuke13–70.0131%11 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0414%10 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0616%10 Feb
anubis3–130.0121%13 Jan
anubis13–90.1332%16 Dec
dust28–130.0626%16 Dec
dust20–10-0.040%8 Dec
inferno13–110.0432%8 Dec
dust213–5-0.0134%29 Nov
mirage13–90.0320%29 Nov
overpass13–4-0.0136%29 Nov
nuke13–6-0.0620%29 Nov
ancient13–50.1330%29 Nov
inferno13–5-0.0410%29 Nov
nuke13–8-0.0324%28 Nov
dust213–70.0226%28 Nov
inferno13–20.0031%28 Nov
train13–90.0527%10 Oct
nuke13–50.0945%10 Oct
inferno10–130.0329%10 Oct
inferno11–130.0315%10 Oct
ancient15–150.0922%10 Oct
train7–130.0936%3 Oct
ancient16–140.1020%3 Oct
nuke13–40.0526%3 Oct
anubis6–13-0.0863%21 Jun
anubis13–40.1521%20 Jun
ancient13–90.0236%25 May
inferno13–160.0243%23 May
ancient6–13-0.0629%23 May
anubis13–11-0.0125%16 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →