Cozmoz

Cozmoz — CS2 Stats

76561197960339778[U:1:74050]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

842Tracked matches31%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,072 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,072 → 1,072
+4Tracked matches · now 842
0.0ppWin rate · 31.0% → 31.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 15 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,587 +1,092 15 Feb26 Jun · 29 days played
16,49519,894peak 19,89415 Feb26 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,072 +0 31 Aug14 Sept · 2 observations
1,0721,072peak 1,07231 Aug14 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,072Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-02-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,072
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCozmozFACEITLevel 4 · 1,072 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,072csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning40
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45532Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.08 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch1.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time632ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 26 Feb
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 5 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 26 Jun
13–1Biggest win · cache, 9 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
912In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 22anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB26141254%-0.02
nukeA2213959%-0.01
ancientC1881044%-0.00
anubisD93633%-0.02
overpassD62433%-0.03
cacheC52340%-0.02
train41325%-0.02
mirage41325%-0.04
dust23030%-0.07
vertigo2020%-0.07
poseidon110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

159Matches
50%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
65.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4945%0.8312.6
Ancient3339%0.6811.3
Nuke3165%0.8513.7
Cache1275%0.9413.0
Dust2875%0.7710.8
Vertigo714%0.609.9
Mirage757%0.8811.6
Anubis633%0.7111.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
648msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
10.83HE damage / grenade
9.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0430%5 Sept
inferno9–00.0536%5 Sept
inferno9–20.004%5 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0623%3 Sept
nuke13–50.0017%28 Aug
cache13–50.0910%25 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0619%9 Aug
nuke13–100.0016%31 Jul
nuke9–130.0617%30 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0110%30 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0721%30 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.0610%30 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0610%23 Jul
dust211–13-0.0520%23 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0318%22 Jul
cache6–13-0.0810%22 Jul
ancient6–130.0016%22 Jul
inferno8–8-0.1812%6 Jul
nuke5–9-0.1319%6 Jul
nuke9–3-0.097%6 Jul
cache6–13-0.0819%2 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0416%26 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0424%26 Jun
train12–120.0617%21 Jun
inferno13–8-0.059%20 Jun
ancient13–80.0222%20 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0110%13 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0227%13 Jun
ancient13–160.0223%12 Jun
ancient13–100.0510%12 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0316%12 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0616%9 Jun
mirage1–13-0.1012%1 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0715%1 Jun
ancient13–80.0218%1 Jun
anubis0–13-0.110%30 May
nuke13–60.025%26 May
inferno13–100.0330%26 May
anubis11–130.0114%23 May
nuke10–130.0421%21 May
inferno7–13-0.0411%19 May
nuke13–90.0710%19 May
overpass13–110.0113%18 May
inferno4–13-0.0713%18 May
ancient14–160.0210%18 May
inferno13–11-0.0412%17 May
dust26–13-0.1114%17 May
ancient13–11-0.0721%17 May
ancient5–13-0.0216%10 May
overpass8–13-0.0610%10 May
cache13–10.030%9 May
cache6–13-0.049%9 May
train13–11-0.0226%8 May
dust25–13-0.0617%8 May
inferno11–13-0.055%2 May
anubis7–130.0217%2 May
ancient11–13-0.0324%2 May
overpass13–10-0.011%2 May
vertigo7–13-0.0918%2 May
nuke8–13-0.0817%28 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0413%28 Apr
overpass8–130.0316%28 Apr
mirage5–13-0.038%28 Apr
train8–13-0.056%27 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0114%26 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0414%26 Apr
train8–13-0.0817%26 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0220%14 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0519%14 Apr
ancient13–10-0.029%11 Apr
nuke13–6-0.029%11 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0432%11 Apr
ancient13–40.0322%11 Apr
nuke13–100.0013%7 Apr
inferno13–50.0118%7 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0211%5 Apr
inferno12–16-0.0220%5 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0118%5 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0715%19 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0022%18 Mar
ancient9–130.0518%17 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0514%16 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0615%16 Mar
inferno9–7-0.0218%16 Mar
nuke13–10.1010%13 Mar
inferno13–80.0216%8 Mar
inferno13–20.0521%8 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0215%3 Mar
inferno16–12-0.0117%3 Mar
nuke13–50.1323%26 Feb
anubis13–100.049%26 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0522%25 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0420%25 Feb
inferno9–50.0411%22 Feb
poseidon9–50.1117%22 Feb
inferno9–130.0123%18 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0216%17 Feb
anubis16–140.0113%17 Feb
ancient13–30.0214%17 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0312%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →