-purGedM4

-purGedM4 — CS2 Stats

76561197960272361[U:1:6633]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,306Tracked matches62%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,064Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53498 of 252070 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,401 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,064 → 22,064
0Faceit ELO · 2,401 → 2,401
+2Tracked matches · now 3,306
0.0ppWin rate · 62.1% → 62.1%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,064 -637 20 Mar – 15 Sept · 21 days played
20,58122,814peak 22,81420 Mar15 Sept
23,026Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,401Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2026-03-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,401
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 99 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 750 below peak (22,814)
  • -750 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,483 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,936 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-purGedM4FACEITLevel 10 · 2,401 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,064 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,401csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning63
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +6.2pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time553ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 20 Mar →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · mirage, 22 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 2–3 · nuke, 6 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC188–1044%0.01
mirageA1710–759%-0.01
cacheA148–657%0.03
anubisB147–750%0.01
infernoD123–925%0.03
dust2B105–550%-0.00
ancientB84–450%0.03
overpassS64–267%-0.00
poseidon—10–10%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,741Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
74.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis33856%1.0915.5
Mirage26248%0.9715.6
Dust222450%1.0215.0
Inferno22351%1.1115.7
Ancient19742%0.9614.7
Nuke17348%1.0014.9
Overpass8153%1.0916.4
Train6229%0.9615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
43.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.3%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
555msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
60.6%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
15.8%Flash assists
6.47HE damage / grenade
6.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7351% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache3–70.0322%9 Sept →
cache16–120.0112%9 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0116%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.1125%5 Sept →
cache8–130.0925%4 Sept →
nuke11–130.0827%4 Sept →
inferno13–40.0530%4 Sept →
cache13–10.0631%2 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.057%31 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.016%9 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0215%7 Aug →
nuke13–40.0513%7 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0015%7 Aug →
mirage13–50.0518%7 Aug →
ancient13–90.1118%7 Aug →
nuke13–80.0214%7 Aug →
nuke2–3-0.060%6 Aug →
mirage13–60.019%6 Aug →
anubis13–70.0719%6 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0419%6 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0321%4 Aug →
cache13–70.0112%30 Jul →
cache13–40.0625%30 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0425%23 Jul →
dust215–150.0526%22 Jul →
nuke13–60.0110%22 Jul →
ancient16–140.0314%22 Jul →
nuke13–20.0733%18 Jul →
nuke7–130.0212%18 Jul →
nuke9–130.0119%18 Jul →
anubis13–10.0827%17 Jul →
cache13–50.1010%15 Jul →
ancient11–130.0320%14 Jul →
anubis9–130.0324%11 Jul →
cache16–120.0818%11 Jul →
cache13–110.0122%11 Jul →
dust213–20.0926%11 Jul →
nuke13–80.0117%11 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0130%9 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0422%9 Jul →
cache6–130.0223%9 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0110%8 Jul →
dust213–100.0525%7 Jul →
cache13–100.0623%6 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0416%5 Jul →
mirage10–130.0013%3 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0117%3 Jul →
ancient13–40.0323%2 Jul →
inferno4–80.0429%1 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0315%24 Jun →
ancient13–60.1122%23 Jun →
mirage11–130.0338%22 Jun →
nuke6–130.039%10 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0117%8 Jun →
inferno8–130.0120%5 Jun →
overpass25–22-0.0122%2 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0417%31 May →
poseidon8–80.1131%30 May →
overpass13–11-0.0113%29 May →
anubis13–30.0620%26 May →
mirage16–140.0214%25 May →
anubis12–16-0.0518%23 May →
inferno10–14-0.0231%20 May →
anubis6–13-0.047%16 May →
inferno10–130.1121%15 May →
mirage15–150.0115%15 May →
nuke8–13-0.0337%14 May →
anubis7–130.0126%14 May →
inferno14–160.0115%10 May →
dust213–9-0.0116%9 May →
dust26–13-0.0815%9 May →
mirage13–8-0.0214%8 May →
anubis22–18-0.0522%3 May →
inferno11–13-0.0227%3 May →
nuke13–10-0.0213%27 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0329%22 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.028%19 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0528%19 Apr →
mirage16–12-0.0118%17 Apr →
inferno15–150.0728%17 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0616%16 Apr →
inferno7–130.039%16 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0315%12 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.047%11 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.017%11 Apr →
overpass16–14-0.0113%9 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.037%8 Apr →
ancient8–110.0021%7 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0319%3 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0319%2 Apr →
dust211–130.0113%31 Mar →
anubis13–60.0726%30 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0627%29 Mar →
nuke13–90.0729%29 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0131%26 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0412%20 Mar →
inferno13–70.1326%20 Mar →
mirage13–60.0329%20 Mar →
overpass13–70.0916%20 Mar →
anubis13–50.0717%20 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.