❤ KingSkiper ❤

❤ KingSkiper ❤ — CS2 Stats

LV76561199884798091[U:1:1924532363]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

459Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
595Hours in CS74Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating8.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,011Top 5% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5577 of 227767 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,019 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 17 days played since 16 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,011 +3,050 21 Jul18 Sept · 16 days played
23,96127,011peak 27,01121 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,019 +0 30 Aug17 Sept · 3 observations
1,0191,019peak 1,01930 Aug17 Sept
27,168Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,019Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
17Days played since 2026-07-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,019
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,011
  • +533 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,989 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,274), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.6%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.341.021.04above
Match win rate60.9%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG❤ KingSkiper ❤FACEITLevel 5 · 1,019 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER27,011 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,019csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning71
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59365Last 10059%Win rateWWWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.08 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +80ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 91 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility5.8
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch6.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning7.1
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 8.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time506ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–7 · boulder, 30 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–4 · ancient, 14 Sept
266msFastest reaction time · 1–7 · inferno, 16 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S42281467%0.05
mirageB23121152%0.01
ancientA149564%0.04
infernoD91811%0.01
cacheS65183%0.02
anubis32167%-0.00
nuke21150%-0.01
boulder110100%0.29

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,988Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
581Matches
60.9%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players
45.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,884MVPs
209Hours (in match)
700Bombs planted
186Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,349dust2
568inferno
305nuke
96office
40vertigo
36train
26italy
5ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

30Matches
70%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
93.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1250%1.2416.7
Dust2978%1.6618.2
Ancient4100%1.3814.3
Inferno250%1.5529.5
Anubis1100%1.6710.0
Overpass1100%1.299.0
Nuke1100%1.6922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
5.4°Preaim
531msReaction time
60.2%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
10.02HE damage / grenade
8.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0824%18 Sept
dust213–30.1217%18 Sept
dust213–100.1611%18 Sept
mirage13–40.0519%18 Sept
dust25–10-0.0323%18 Sept
dust216–120.0619%18 Sept
dust213–50.1327%17 Sept
dust213–90.1322%17 Sept
dust213–20.049%17 Sept
dust213–11-0.0234%17 Sept
nuke3–130.0321%16 Sept
inferno1–70.0230%16 Sept
dust23–13-0.0524%16 Sept
ancient13–110.0118%16 Sept
dust213–11-0.0343%15 Sept
ancient13–110.0623%15 Sept
dust21–13-0.020%15 Sept
mirage2–13-0.1125%15 Sept
dust24–1-0.0333%15 Sept
dust213–90.0730%14 Sept
dust28–130.1018%14 Sept
dust213–1-0.010%14 Sept
ancient1–40.02100%14 Sept
mirage13–00.0112%14 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0522%14 Sept
cache13–6-0.0618%14 Sept
dust27–130.0928%14 Sept
dust28–130.0823%14 Sept
dust213–90.1016%14 Sept
mirage8–130.0826%14 Sept
ancient9–130.0317%14 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0730%13 Sept
ancient15–150.0823%13 Sept
dust213–110.0817%13 Sept
dust213–5-0.0513%13 Sept
inferno5–130.0533%12 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0218%12 Sept
mirage1–5-0.0413%12 Sept
dust216–120.0717%12 Sept
cache0–3-0.0833%12 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0012%12 Sept
dust213–4-0.0021%12 Sept
cache13–100.0817%11 Sept
inferno5–40.0140%11 Sept
inferno5–13-0.1213%11 Sept
dust29–13-0.1143%11 Sept
mirage7–20.1111%11 Sept
anubis8–130.0832%11 Sept
anubis13–0-0.0230%11 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0430%7 Sept
mirage10–3-0.0217%7 Sept
dust25–13-0.0236%7 Sept
cache13–70.1229%7 Sept
mirage13–50.0526%7 Sept
dust28–10.1022%7 Sept
cache13–90.0216%7 Sept
mirage11–6-0.0738%7 Sept
dust213–20.1715%24 Aug
dust28–130.1714%24 Aug
dust213–100.1126%24 Aug
inferno8–80.0819%24 Aug
dust213–30.1917%24 Aug
ancient13–30.1325%12 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0125%12 Aug
dust210–20.0321%12 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0822%12 Aug
dust216–120.1118%6 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0625%6 Aug
dust21–13-0.100%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0316%6 Aug
dust21–10-0.0930%6 Aug
inferno13–30.0332%6 Aug
dust213–3-0.0538%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0127%2 Aug
inferno14–160.0418%2 Aug
mirage2–00.26100%2 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0333%2 Aug
mirage13–00.02100%2 Aug
mirage10–1-0.0320%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0230%2 Aug
dust212–120.0810%30 Jul
boulder13–70.2921%30 Jul
dust213–60.0124%30 Jul
dust213–10.1026%30 Jul
ancient13–50.2018%30 Jul
ancient13–30.0644%30 Jul
inferno2–8-0.058%30 Jul
ancient11–130.1317%30 Jul
dust213–100.0316%30 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0435%21 Jul
ancient13–40.0219%21 Jul
mirage13–90.1024%21 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0440%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.108%21 Jul
cache13–50.0514%21 Jul
dust213–110.0524%17 Jul
mirage15–150.0016%17 Jul
ancient13–30.0210%17 Jul
mirage16–120.0416%17 Jul
dust212–120.1728%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →