Ted_Logan

Ted_Logan — CS2 Stats

DE76561199875503413[U:1:1915237685]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

96Tracked matches32%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningSupport
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,116 -461 3 Jun – 30 Jun · 5 days played
10,11610,577peak 10,5773 Jun30 Jun
10,577Peak Premier in tracked matches
62Days played since 2025-08-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning46
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–40–9Last 9649%Win rateLTLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 96 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility6.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time571ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 96 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · overpass, 3 Jun →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · train, 3 Mar →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 26 May →
13–0Biggest win · train, 6 Jan →

Across the last 96 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 10dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3015–1550%-0.01
anubisC2310–1343%0.01
overpassA106–460%0.01
dust2D51–420%-0.02
cacheA53–260%0.00
trainA53–260%0.01
vertigo—41–325%-0.02
nuke—43–175%-0.02
mirage—42–250%-0.01
ancient—32–167%0.04
office—21–150%0.00
grail—10–10%0.03

Across the last 96 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
64.5%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
566msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
31.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
11.10HE damage / grenade
11.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1123% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6922% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo10–13-0.036%26 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0310%25 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0617%20 Sept →
dust27–13-0.039%20 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0113%16 Sept →
inferno9–20.0810%12 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0512%10 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0112%10 Sept →
inferno7–130.089%4 Sept →
inferno9–40.0416%25 Aug →
anubis13–110.0814%25 Aug →
inferno13–70.0117%6 Aug →
inferno13–30.098%31 Jul →
vertigo10–130.0315%31 Jul →
anubis13–80.0410%26 Jul →
anubis13–110.0112%21 Jul →
inferno13–80.0010%15 Jul →
office10–13-0.0616%11 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0313%8 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0118%8 Jul →
cache9–13-0.047%4 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0820%30 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0310%30 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.0323%30 Jun →
train13–40.1020%23 Jun →
anubis13–16-0.048%22 Jun →
dust213–160.0215%19 Jun →
overpass12–12-0.0315%17 Jun →
dust27–13-0.037%17 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0023%17 Jun →
inferno8–130.0113%16 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0714%14 Jun →
overpass13–30.1324%3 Jun →
inferno13–90.014%3 Jun →
ancient13–80.0713%3 Jun →
inferno13–3-0.019%3 Jun →
cache13–60.1116%3 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.017%28 May →
anubis8–20.0420%28 May →
anubis8–13-0.0613%28 May →
ancient13–100.0310%26 May →
inferno13–7-0.0613%26 May →
cache13–80.0015%3 May →
inferno13–50.139%3 May →
inferno13–100.0016%20 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0519%9 Apr →
anubis13–50.085%2 Apr →
overpass13–20.0520%26 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.026%19 Mar →
inferno12–120.0222%18 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0127%18 Mar →
overpass15–150.0113%13 Mar →
mirage13–50.0913%13 Mar →
overpass13–2-0.0114%13 Mar →
overpass7–9-0.0314%12 Mar →
inferno2–13-0.053%6 Mar →
train3–13-0.0429%3 Mar →
train12–12-0.0717%3 Mar →
ancient15–150.0016%18 Feb →
inferno13–20.0018%18 Feb →
anubis12–120.0316%10 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.037%10 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0514%10 Feb →
office13–90.0712%21 Jan →
overpass13–30.0622%14 Jan →
inferno9–130.0312%12 Jan →
anubis13–110.0411%11 Jan →
train13–00.069%6 Jan →
inferno2–13-0.1219%24 Dec →
anubis12–12-0.017%24 Dec →
anubis8–13-0.046%18 Dec →
vertigo13–9-0.0710%18 Dec →
inferno13–10-0.0411%15 Dec →
anubis11–13-0.005%11 Dec →
overpass13–3-0.0314%19 Nov →
overpass13–8-0.0225%19 Nov →
train13–10-0.0211%6 Nov →
anubis11–130.0321%2 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.0318%2 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0621%2 Nov →
anubis13–100.0916%24 Oct →
anubis13–90.0118%15 Oct →
nuke13–60.0418%15 Oct →
anubis13–80.0215%15 Oct →
anubis3–10.0223%15 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0210%4 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0214%23 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0617%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.047%17 Sept →
inferno0–9-0.1622%15 Sept →
dust212–12-0.076%8 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0517%8 Sept →
grail11–130.0313%29 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.057%9 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.017%9 Aug →
anubis3–130.0220%8 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.