kexzy

kexzy — CS2 Stats

76561199864971323[U:1:1904705595]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

524Tracked matches47%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,593 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,258 +915 19 Dec – 7 Jan · 3 days played
11,23312,258peak 12,25819 Dec7 Jan
12,258Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,593Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2025-12-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,593
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 158 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkexzyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,593 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,593csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning57
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–34–4Last 10062%Win rateWWLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.7
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time549ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 4 Mar →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · poseidon, 2 Feb →
406msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 11 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 19 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 82% over 11infernoWeakest map · 56% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2715–1256%0.04
dust2A2716–1159%0.02
mirageA138–562%0.04
nukeS119–282%0.06
cacheS54–180%0.03
anubis—41–325%-0.01
overpass—43–175%0.03
ancient—32–167%0.04
train—32–167%0.06
poseidon—21–150%0.06
vertigo—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (56% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

492Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
77.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212547%1.1416.1
Mirage10849%1.1516.4
Inferno7953%1.1516.4
Ancient7260%1.1816.5
Nuke4452%1.1416.0
Anubis2832%1.1015.4
Cache1861%1.1713.7
Overpass1457%1.3016.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.0%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
539msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
11.62HE damage / grenade
9.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.911% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0732%31 Oct →
cache13–20.0417%29 Oct →
inferno5–130.0022%29 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0418%27 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0020%27 Oct →
inferno13–160.0826%26 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0719%26 Oct →
inferno8–130.0618%26 Oct →
cache13–50.0213%22 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0515%22 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0316%22 Oct →
dust213–80.0224%20 Oct →
nuke13–20.0914%20 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0520%20 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0120%14 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0115%14 Oct →
inferno16–190.0129%3 Oct →
inferno13–110.0414%2 Oct →
nuke10–130.0012%1 Oct →
ancient16–130.0519%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0214%15 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0717%11 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0420%11 Sept →
dust24–130.0321%9 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0717%9 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0023%8 Sept →
cache13–40.1123%8 Sept →
dust28–130.0226%3 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0410%1 Sept →
dust27–130.0527%25 Aug →
mirage13–10.009%16 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0236%16 Aug →
inferno13–100.0714%8 Aug →
dust213–50.0518%23 Jun →
nuke16–14-0.0329%2 Apr →
nuke13–50.1226%31 Mar →
dust215–150.0827%31 Mar →
dust26–130.0313%28 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0225%25 Mar →
dust213–80.0433%24 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0224%22 Mar →
inferno13–100.0438%21 Mar →
inferno16–130.0116%15 Mar →
dust213–90.0216%15 Mar →
inferno9–00.1110%10 Mar →
nuke9–6-0.0019%10 Mar →
inferno4–90.0127%10 Mar →
inferno9–20.2333%10 Mar →
inferno8–80.0441%10 Mar →
nuke9–40.1622%10 Mar →
poseidon8–80.0921%10 Mar →
inferno9–10.2018%10 Mar →
inferno9–7-0.0339%10 Mar →
vertigo9–60.1642%10 Mar →
inferno7–9-0.0134%10 Mar →
overpass9–70.0533%4 Mar →
nuke9–00.2516%4 Mar →
inferno9–50.0215%4 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0124%4 Mar →
dust213–60.0230%4 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0629%4 Mar →
anubis13–110.1419%3 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0212%2 Mar →
dust213–90.0424%1 Mar →
dust213–50.119%28 Feb →
mirage13–20.0718%27 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0213%27 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.0532%27 Feb →
inferno9–50.0217%27 Feb →
mirage13–16-0.0019%26 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0030%16 Feb →
ancient13–20.0824%16 Feb →
poseidon9–50.0350%2 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.0038%2 Feb →
dust213–110.0525%2 Feb →
dust213–80.1522%27 Jan →
mirage13–30.1715%27 Jan →
train9–130.0221%27 Jan →
inferno9–30.0830%27 Jan →
inferno9–30.0935%27 Jan →
dust213–3-0.0215%27 Jan →
mirage13–70.0519%18 Jan →
nuke13–40.0630%13 Jan →
dust212–120.1417%13 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0326%13 Jan →
mirage13–70.0213%12 Jan →
inferno9–40.1837%8 Jan →
overpass9–50.095%8 Jan →
inferno16–13-0.038%7 Jan →
mirage13–10.0124%7 Jan →
dust213–70.0435%7 Jan →
mirage6–130.0719%3 Jan →
train13–70.069%3 Jan →
train13–60.1026%3 Jan →
dust214–16-0.0419%29 Dec →
mirage5–130.0611%28 Dec →
nuke13–0-0.0115%19 Dec →
inferno7–13-0.0213%17 Dec →
mirage13–110.0723%16 Dec →
nuke2–00.000%16 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.