BUSH3L

BUSH3L — CS2 Stats

IO76561199833175700[U:1:1872909972]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,060Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,004 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +2,467 11 Sept – 12 Nov · 16 days played
12,53318,299peak 18,29911 Sept12 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,004 +0 11 Sept – 16 Oct · 3 observations
1,0041,004peak 1,00411 Sept16 Oct
18,650Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,004Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
13Days played since 2026-09-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,004
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 47 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-11
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,299 below peak (18,299)
  • -1,637 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBUSH3LFACEITLevel 4 · 1,004 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,004csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning46
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLWLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility4.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time587ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 4 Nov →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 4 Nov →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 30 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 7 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 91% over 11anubisWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2715–1256%-0.01
mirageB157–847%-0.03
anubisD144–1029%-0.02
nukeB136–746%-0.02
ancientA117–464%0.00
cacheS1110–191%0.00
infernoA95–456%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

424Matches
50%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
76.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust215153%0.9314.3
Mirage7152%0.8414.2
Ancient6055%0.8715.2
Anubis5737%0.8013.9
Inferno4151%0.8413.8
Nuke2348%0.8314.7
Cache1136%0.8614.3
Overpass967%0.8915.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
29.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.1%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
580msReaction time
43.4%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
7.53HE damage / grenade
4.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–16-0.0112%12 Nov →
nuke13–100.0618%12 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0111%12 Nov →
ancient12–16-0.0018%12 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0120%12 Nov →
inferno13–7-0.0321%12 Nov →
cache13–3-0.020%11 Nov →
nuke13–90.0122%11 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0124%11 Nov →
nuke13–100.0217%11 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0519%11 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0211%11 Nov →
dust28–13-0.1122%11 Nov →
dust213–50.0219%11 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0119%10 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0619%10 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0521%10 Nov →
anubis13–8-0.0417%10 Nov →
dust213–90.0421%10 Nov →
dust29–130.0229%10 Nov →
dust213–6-0.048%10 Nov →
anubis13–16-0.0220%9 Nov →
dust213–100.0011%9 Nov →
ancient13–110.0016%9 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0514%9 Nov →
cache13–70.0310%9 Nov →
anubis0–13-0.098%9 Nov →
mirage13–3-0.1021%9 Nov →
ancient13–100.0322%8 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.065%8 Nov →
inferno13–50.0214%8 Nov →
cache13–4-0.0017%8 Nov →
cache9–13-0.0422%8 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0320%8 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0417%8 Nov →
ancient13–16-0.0611%8 Nov →
mirage3–130.0229%8 Nov →
nuke9–130.0113%7 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0018%7 Nov →
anubis13–10.0114%7 Nov →
mirage13–100.0436%7 Nov →
dust213–100.0228%7 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0121%7 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0323%7 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0320%7 Nov →
mirage12–160.009%7 Nov →
anubis5–13-0.0812%7 Nov →
inferno13–8-0.0811%7 Nov →
anubis13–4-0.0010%7 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0315%5 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0010%5 Nov →
nuke4–13-0.0311%5 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0132%5 Nov →
dust213–70.0028%5 Nov →
dust22–13-0.0426%5 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0213%5 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0810%5 Nov →
inferno14–16-0.0116%5 Nov →
nuke0–13-0.0819%4 Nov →
dust213–30.1055%4 Nov →
ancient13–30.1320%4 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0214%4 Nov →
anubis13–50.0330%4 Nov →
cache16–13-0.0321%3 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0118%3 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0315%3 Nov →
mirage8–130.0419%3 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0621%3 Nov →
cache13–70.0940%3 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0519%2 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0426%2 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.0722%2 Nov →
inferno13–100.0417%2 Nov →
cache13–7-0.0115%2 Nov →
cache13–80.0326%2 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0412%1 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0217%1 Nov →
ancient15–150.0121%1 Nov →
ancient13–110.0215%1 Nov →
mirage13–30.0220%1 Nov →
dust23–12-0.0814%1 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0112%1 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.029%1 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0222%1 Nov →
dust215–15-0.0523%31 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0812%31 Oct →
cache13–6-0.034%31 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0425%31 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0615%31 Oct →
dust213–60.0615%31 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0215%31 Oct →
cache13–110.009%31 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0213%31 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0414%30 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0214%30 Oct →
anubis2–130.0129%30 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0720%30 Oct →
dust211–130.0117%30 Oct →
anubis4–130.0012%30 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0019%30 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.