fyln

fyln — CS2 Stats

GB76561199826696635[U:1:1866430907]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

620Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
2,588Hours in CS90Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,248Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4444 of 221164 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,172 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 620 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 19 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,248 +2,941 19 Jul13 Sept · 8 days played
24,30727,668peak 27,66819 Jul13 Sept
28,480Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,172Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-07-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,172
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 328 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 420 below peak (27,668)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,752 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate61.3%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy0.6%13.2%13.7%13.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.071.090.17 short
Match win rate59.9%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfylnFACEITLevel 9 · 2,172 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER27,248 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,172csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning41
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateWLWLLWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.8

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time599ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 4–6 · anubis, 23 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 24 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · anubis, 22 Jul
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6cacheWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2415963%0.02
mirageA23131057%0.01
infernoC135838%-0.00
dust2S139469%0.01
cacheD82625%0.02
ancientS75271%0.01
overpassS65183%0.03
nuke41325%-0.03
vertigo21150%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

52,494Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
2,236Matches
59.9%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 9 players
61.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
0.6%Shot accuracy
7,902MVPs
1,967Hours (in match)
2,290Bombs planted
589Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,260
AWP3,587
MP92,118
FAMAS1,251
MAC-101,201

Lifetime map wins

3,683dust2
3,115inferno
1,616nuke
776vertigo
702train
403office
110italy
11cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

485Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.4ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18555%1.0716.0
Dust210645%1.0216.0
Ancient8856%1.1116.9
Anubis3656%1.1316.4
Nuke2148%0.9414.8
Inferno1741%0.9014.6
Train1650%1.1017.4
Overpass1656%1.1716.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
604msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
30.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
11.41HE damage / grenade
4.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2371% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–7-0.0326%10 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0540%3 Sept
mirage13–60.0424%2 Sept
cache2–13-0.0322%23 Aug
mirage3–130.0222%22 Aug
inferno13–50.0214%22 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0522%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0021%19 Aug
cache13–40.1326%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0430%15 Aug
dust213–80.1125%5 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0321%5 Aug
ancient13–40.0210%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0722%30 Jul
inferno11–130.0043%28 Jul
nuke9–30.1318%27 Jul
inferno6–130.0341%27 Jul
mirage2–40.0436%27 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0519%26 Jul
inferno5–130.0726%26 Jul
vertigo9–7-0.1132%25 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0635%25 Jul
mirage0–13-0.050%25 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0142%25 Jul
anubis0–2-0.210%25 Jul
mirage1–13-0.020%25 Jul
dust23–13-0.070%25 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0418%25 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0121%25 Jul
dust213–90.0226%25 Jul
mirage13–0-0.0432%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0835%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0018%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0129%25 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0422%24 Jul
dust25–13-0.0242%24 Jul
mirage13–10.0175%24 Jul
mirage13–1-0.01100%24 Jul
ancient13–20.0539%24 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0223%24 Jul
mirage13–10.0540%24 Jul
dust211–130.0150%24 Jul
dust213–11-0.0221%24 Jul
mirage13–20.0330%24 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0326%24 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0121%24 Jul
anubis0–130.0311%24 Jul
dust213–110.0018%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0233%23 Jul
mirage13–00.0130%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0020%23 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0228%23 Jul
mirage10–130.0021%23 Jul
mirage13–100.0224%23 Jul
anubis13–50.0727%23 Jul
dust213–60.0626%23 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0226%23 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0213%23 Jul
anubis13–70.0633%23 Jul
anubis4–60.1816%23 Jul
anubis12–120.0140%23 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0332%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0321%23 Jul
anubis9–130.0322%22 Jul
anubis13–40.0018%22 Jul
anubis13–90.0321%22 Jul
anubis13–100.1033%22 Jul
anubis13–80.0630%22 Jul
anubis13–80.0331%22 Jul
anubis13–40.1234%22 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0224%22 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0024%21 Jul
anubis8–130.0228%21 Jul
anubis13–20.1029%21 Jul
nuke7–9-0.0222%21 Jul
nuke0–9-0.190%21 Jul
anubis13–90.0516%21 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0129%21 Jul
dust213–30.0627%21 Jul
inferno4–130.0021%21 Jul
inferno6–130.0355%21 Jul
overpass13–5-0.0436%21 Jul
ancient13–50.0428%21 Jul
ancient13–0-0.008%21 Jul
dust213–5-0.0223%21 Jul
cache11–13-0.0127%21 Jul
cache8–130.0030%21 Jul
cache12–120.0823%21 Jul
overpass13–50.0525%20 Jul
overpass9–10.0622%20 Jul
overpass13–80.0632%20 Jul
overpass3–130.0126%20 Jul
dust216–120.0420%20 Jul
mirage13–100.0528%20 Jul
overpass13–20.0541%20 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0233%20 Jul
cache6–13-0.0126%20 Jul
cache7–130.0349%20 Jul
dust24–130.0129%20 Jul
dust213–6-0.0226%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →