ltctxy

ltctxy — CS2 Stats

PR76561199808016190[U:1:1847750462]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

644Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,272Blue band · top ~42.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 790 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,272 -118 18 Apr – 11 Nov · 25 days played
8,01913,336peak 13,33618 Apr11 Nov
Faceit ELO: 790 +0 14 Sept – 6 Nov · 4 observations
790790peak 79014 Sept6 Nov
13,336Peak Premier in tracked matches
790Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-04-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 790
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 111 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,064 below peak (13,336)
  • +1,323 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,156 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,728 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGltctxyFACEITLevel 5 · 790 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,272 · Blue bandPEAK ELO790csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning62
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–52–9Last 10039%Win rateLWLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 716ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.7
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 669ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time657ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 30 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 26 May →
453msFastest reaction time · 12–5 · dust2, 9 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 20 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 43% over 14ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC4819–2940%0.00
mirageC269–1735%0.01
dust2C146–843%-0.01
ancientD72–529%0.01
nuke—32–167%0.06
cache—10–10%-0.05
anubis—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

659Matches
49%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
78.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21750%1.0615.5
Dust215345%1.0014.8
Ancient9947%1.0015.3
Inferno6156%0.9814.8
Nuke6148%0.9714.5
Anubis5850%0.9916.4
Overpass560%1.1214.8
Cache450%1.0818.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
669msReaction time
55.5%T opening success
59.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
6.24HE damage / grenade
9.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4483 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–9-0.1217%13 Nov →
inferno9–30.1921%13 Nov →
inferno5–9-0.0029%11 Nov →
inferno9–60.1423%11 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0822%11 Nov →
inferno7–9-0.0126%11 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0118%10 Nov →
dust212–50.0732%9 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0513%9 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0329%9 Nov →
anubis13–100.0115%9 Nov →
dust213–7-0.014%5 Nov →
mirage13–80.0121%5 Nov →
dust27–130.0617%4 Nov →
inferno7–9-0.0521%4 Nov →
inferno7–9-0.0733%2 Nov →
inferno9–00.2328%2 Nov →
inferno3–90.0629%31 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0321%31 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0421%31 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.1018%31 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0123%30 Oct →
inferno9–70.0130%30 Oct →
dust23–13-0.067%30 Oct →
dust26–130.0229%30 Oct →
inferno9–60.0334%27 Oct →
inferno8–80.1426%27 Oct →
inferno9–30.0928%27 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0529%27 Oct →
mirage13–40.0918%27 Oct →
mirage13–110.0723%27 Oct →
inferno0–9-0.2420%16 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1442%15 Oct →
ancient2–130.0312%15 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.1311%15 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1319%15 Oct →
inferno8–80.0519%15 Oct →
inferno9–60.0119%15 Oct →
inferno9–60.0632%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.0618%15 Oct →
mirage13–90.0237%15 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0010%15 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0414%9 Oct →
inferno9–50.1732%9 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.2020%7 Oct →
inferno8–80.1043%7 Oct →
inferno8–80.169%3 Oct →
mirage13–30.2420%30 Sept →
mirage9–130.1918%30 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0423%30 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0817%29 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0217%29 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0526%12 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.2710%4 Sept →
mirage5–130.0221%2 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0225%2 Sept →
nuke13–20.0616%2 Sept →
inferno9–50.1525%2 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0121%27 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0214%25 Aug →
mirage13–50.0311%23 Aug →
inferno9–60.0430%30 Jul →
mirage15–150.0217%19 Jul →
mirage6–130.0126%19 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0114%19 Jul →
inferno12–120.0315%16 Jul →
dust216–130.0414%9 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0510%9 Jul →
inferno13–110.0015%6 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0917%6 Jul →
inferno9–20.1628%4 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0210%2 Jul →
ancient12–120.1417%2 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.0524%26 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0013%26 Jun →
mirage4–130.1217%26 Jun →
dust212–120.0218%24 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0613%17 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0510%14 Jun →
inferno13–70.0824%7 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0115%7 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0417%6 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.040%4 Jun →
inferno9–60.0431%30 May →
inferno6–90.0527%29 May →
inferno6–9-0.0326%29 May →
dust212–12-0.0612%27 May →
mirage3–13-0.0650%26 May →
inferno2–90.0236%26 May →
inferno9–30.1019%26 May →
ancient7–13-0.0510%25 May →
nuke13–10.1229%20 May →
inferno9–4-0.0331%14 May →
ancient13–90.0114%7 May →
inferno11–13-0.0511%29 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0111%26 Apr →
mirage13–40.0215%26 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0522%26 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0728%18 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.1013%18 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.