starkovsk1s — CS2 Stats

76561199800363673[U:1:1840097945]

1,072Tracked matches47%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,434Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3018 of 26163 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,754 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstarkovsk1sFACEITLevel 10 · 2,754 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,434 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning56
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5050Last 10050%Win rateWLLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression2.8
Utility2.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.6
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time554ms+51ms
first ⅓ avg 503ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy28.4%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–9
132Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 24infernoWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27131448%0.03
anubisS2416867%0.02
ancientC1881044%-0.02
dust2A95456%0.01
nukeS96367%0.03
cacheD72529%0.02
infernoD5050%0.01
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,175Matches
54%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
86.5ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage30853%1.3218.0
Dust220155%1.2918.6
Ancient18550%1.2918.5
Anubis15555%1.3918.0
Inferno13757%1.4119.3
Nuke10457%1.3418.8
Overpass3644%1.2820.1
Cache2540%1.2017.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
552msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
28.3%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
1.0%Flash assists
9.73HE damage / grenade
1.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4174 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7112% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–40.0928%28 Aug
nuke11–130.0122%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0122%28 Aug
anubis13–20.0337%28 Aug
mirage11–130.0229%28 Aug
anubis11–130.0230%27 Aug
anubis9–130.0025%26 Aug
anubis13–70.0419%26 Aug
mirage8–130.0631%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0333%26 Aug
anubis13–100.0425%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0028%26 Aug
dust28–130.0137%26 Aug
ancient13–90.0118%26 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0030%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0030%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0433%25 Aug
cache3–13-0.0733%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0626%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0132%25 Aug
anubis13–100.0124%25 Aug
mirage13–20.1028%25 Aug
mirage16–140.0038%24 Aug
mirage13–80.0324%24 Aug
nuke16–120.0426%24 Aug
mirage13–50.0826%23 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0028%23 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0024%23 Aug
cache11–13-0.0336%23 Aug
nuke13–40.1131%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0528%23 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0334%23 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0325%23 Aug
ancient7–13-0.1025%23 Aug
dust213–20.1125%22 Aug
ancient13–90.0319%22 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0413%22 Aug
ancient9–130.0218%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0128%22 Aug
mirage13–90.0430%22 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0318%22 Aug
nuke13–70.0722%22 Aug
inferno11–130.0333%22 Aug
vertigo9–130.0230%22 Aug
ancient13–100.0323%22 Aug
mirage13–80.0929%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0322%21 Aug
mirage13–90.1339%21 Aug
anubis13–80.0038%21 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0223%20 Aug
cache11–13-0.0339%20 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0028%20 Aug
nuke13–30.0334%20 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0630%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0217%20 Aug
anubis13–50.0341%20 Aug
cache13–100.0523%20 Aug
dust213–60.0226%20 Aug
anubis13–100.0133%20 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0830%17 Aug
mirage8–130.0433%17 Aug
inferno7–130.0637%17 Aug
ancient13–110.0322%10 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0319%10 Aug
cache9–130.0526%10 Aug
mirage16–19-0.0324%9 Aug
ancient13–80.0016%9 Aug
anubis13–20.0714%9 Aug
anubis7–130.0320%9 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0029%7 Aug
anubis13–40.0230%7 Aug
anubis13–70.0626%7 Aug
anubis13–40.0019%7 Aug
mirage13–110.0118%7 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0529%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0322%7 Aug
cache16–130.0826%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.1033%6 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0238%6 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0517%6 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0220%6 Aug
anubis11–130.0226%6 Aug
mirage16–130.0421%6 Aug
ancient16–190.0432%6 Aug
cache7–130.0824%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0531%6 Aug
anubis13–100.0427%6 Aug
mirage13–160.0027%6 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0122%5 Aug
anubis13–70.0229%5 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0526%5 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0325%5 Aug
mirage11–130.0230%5 Aug
dust216–120.0234%5 Aug
mirage13–20.1026%5 Aug
anubis13–70.0633%5 Aug
anubis16–140.0222%5 Aug
inferno13–160.0326%4 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0516%4 Aug
anubis13–100.0524%4 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →