TATA⁰³⁸

TATA⁰³⁸ — CS2 Stats

NL76561199795898506[U:1:1835632778]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,740Tracked matches34%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,450Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8881 of 220541 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,215 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 11 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,450 +799 11 Jul16 Sept · 19 days played
25,54026,701peak 26,70111 Jul16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,215 +0 2 Sept10 Sept · 3 observations
1,2151,215peak 1,2152 Sept10 Sept
26,853Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,215Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,215
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 136 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 251 below peak (26,701)
  • +144 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,550 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTATA⁰³⁸FACEITLevel 8 · 1,215 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,450 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,215csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning54
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43534Last 10043%Win rateWLWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility6.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time533ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−6.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 31 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 24 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · train, 22 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 12 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD1961332%0.02
mirageC1971237%0.01
dust2B178947%0.01
cacheC135838%0.05
ancientC104640%0.01
infernoA95456%0.03
nuke43175%-0.03
overpass42250%0.05
train31233%0.02
vertigo220100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

136Matches
60%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
80.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5452%1.2515.6
Ancient2176%1.4216.1
Inferno2055%1.3916.3
Dust22060%1.4017.3
Nuke967%1.5219.9
Anubis875%1.3619.1
Overpass450%1.0612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
531msReaction time
23.1%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
8.00HE damage / grenade
13.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4855 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.0515% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.0415%16 Sept
nuke0–5-0.120%13 Sept
mirage13–40.0220%12 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0825%11 Sept
dust213–10.0415%10 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0629%9 Sept
mirage13–60.0740%8 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0228%7 Sept
anubis11–130.0112%6 Sept
cache4–130.0421%6 Sept
inferno13–160.0225%6 Sept
mirage4–130.0317%5 Sept
dust213–70.0114%5 Sept
cache7–130.0231%5 Sept
mirage13–40.0712%5 Sept
dust211–130.0012%5 Sept
dust26–130.0421%3 Sept
mirage13–60.0716%2 Sept
dust20–13-0.0224%2 Sept
cache13–110.0616%31 Aug
ancient5–13-0.057%30 Aug
inferno13–160.0625%30 Aug
ancient2–6-0.048%30 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0324%27 Aug
ancient13–90.0710%23 Aug
mirage12–120.0421%23 Aug
cache5–13-0.0121%23 Aug
ancient13–60.0812%22 Aug
train8–130.0518%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0618%20 Aug
dust210–130.1019%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0222%18 Aug
mirage13–110.0213%17 Aug
mirage3–13-0.058%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0335%17 Aug
train7–13-0.0332%16 Aug
anubis13–100.0622%15 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0211%15 Aug
cache10–13-0.0016%15 Aug
anubis4–70.1016%14 Aug
anubis10–130.057%12 Aug
cache13–00.0321%12 Aug
inferno13–70.0329%11 Aug
dust23–80.0927%11 Aug
mirage13–30.0416%11 Aug
ancient0–13-0.1112%10 Aug
anubis13–60.0421%8 Aug
ancient13–20.0613%8 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0622%3 Aug
dust214–16-0.0533%2 Aug
anubis2–130.0211%1 Aug
dust213–30.0719%1 Aug
mirage13–90.1525%31 Jul
vertigo13–70.0324%31 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0116%30 Jul
anubis13–1-0.0017%28 Jul
anubis5–130.0814%27 Jul
nuke13–40.0819%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0016%26 Jul
cache7–130.0827%26 Jul
anubis12–120.0817%26 Jul
inferno4–130.0716%24 Jul
anubis9–130.0122%24 Jul
dust213–2-0.09100%24 Jul
dust28–130.0020%23 Jul
inferno9–70.0519%23 Jul
anubis10–130.0324%22 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0217%22 Jul
overpass13–50.1323%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0214%21 Jul
cache13–30.1213%21 Jul
overpass13–40.0624%21 Jul
cache13–60.0414%21 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0439%20 Jul
cache5–130.0729%19 Jul
vertigo13–80.1124%17 Jul
cache6–130.1418%17 Jul
inferno13–60.0321%16 Jul
dust213–160.0116%16 Jul
cache10–130.0219%15 Jul
train13–20.0525%14 Jul
anubis12–120.0719%14 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0212%13 Jul
ancient13–90.0313%13 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0023%13 Jul
ancient7–130.0815%12 Jul
overpass10–130.0721%12 Jul
dust20–30.000%11 Jul
dust213–4-0.0343%11 Jul
dust213–2-0.03100%11 Jul
nuke9–4-0.1038%11 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0888%11 Jul
anubis9–130.0514%11 Jul
mirage5–130.069%11 Jul
anubis13–0-0.0213%11 Jul
inferno13–00.0033%11 Jul
anubis13–0-0.0115%11 Jul
dust212–0-0.030%11 Jul
cache13–00.0243%11 Jul
nuke13–00.0233%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →