andxniz

andxniz — CS2 Stats

XK76561199780252684[U:1:1819986956]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,177Tracked matches47%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 930 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Share this profile

CSDB.GGandxnizFACEITLevel 5 · 930 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning39
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5149Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −121ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility5.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning3.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time648ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 4 Jun
34%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 23 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · anubis, 7 Jul
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA38211755%-0.03
ancientB24131154%-0.02
anubisC167944%-0.03
dust2B105550%-0.02
infernoS64267%-0.06
overpass41325%-0.07
nuke2020%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,292Matches
50%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
70.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage51852%0.8413.6
Ancient24750%0.8413.9
Dust219052%0.8413.5
Anubis13649%0.8413.3
Inferno13240%0.7412.7
Overpass2654%0.9114.7
Nuke2438%0.6811.8
Vertigo875%0.8010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
64.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
641msReaction time
20.8%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
7.63HE damage / grenade
16.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.8153% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–7-0.0419%29 Aug
dust214–16-0.0215%10 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0419%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0531%16 Jun
inferno19–17-0.0818%5 Jun
mirage13–60.0027%22 May
mirage10–13-0.0718%13 May
ancient19–17-0.0212%11 May
inferno11–13-0.0511%25 Apr
dust28–13-0.0426%28 Mar
dust216–140.0032%21 Mar
ancient13–60.0021%24 Feb
mirage13–90.0623%23 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0417%17 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0222%8 Feb
mirage13–90.0832%7 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0216%20 Dec
dust24–13-0.0914%20 Dec
dust213–5-0.0621%20 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0322%13 Dec
mirage7–13-0.079%3 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0920%29 Nov
ancient10–13-0.0115%24 Nov
overpass6–13-0.0912%24 Nov
dust213–40.035%16 Nov
mirage5–130.0026%15 Oct
mirage10–13-0.0713%14 Oct
overpass9–13-0.0914%30 Sept
mirage9–13-0.094%26 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0917%4 Sept
ancient5–13-0.077%4 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0822%4 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0112%27 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0117%25 Aug
overpass7–13-0.0524%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0633%21 Aug
dust210–13-0.0716%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0819%16 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0231%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0810%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0312%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0322%13 Aug
overpass13–10-0.0624%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0317%1 Aug
ancient13–110.0117%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0026%30 Jul
ancient22–20-0.0212%28 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0817%21 Jul
mirage10–13-0.026%19 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0419%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0412%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.079%12 Jul
anubis10–13-0.099%7 Jul
dust213–80.0213%6 Jul
ancient17–18-0.0414%4 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0323%3 Jul
mirage13–30.0424%1 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0334%23 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0617%22 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0312%22 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0813%17 Jun
ancient7–13-0.117%16 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0111%15 Jun
ancient13–100.0121%13 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0423%11 Jun
mirage16–140.0222%10 Jun
ancient14–160.0228%9 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0124%8 Jun
anubis8–13-0.1014%6 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0617%6 Jun
ancient13–60.0410%6 Jun
ancient10–13-0.058%5 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0215%4 Jun
mirage13–100.0923%4 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0427%2 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0214%2 Jun
dust24–13-0.0313%28 May
mirage13–80.0025%28 May
anubis6–13-0.0610%27 May
mirage13–5-0.029%26 May
anubis13–80.0822%26 May
anubis13–40.0227%26 May
ancient13–9-0.034%25 May
mirage16–14-0.0916%23 May
mirage7–13-0.0829%23 May
anubis13–70.0022%22 May
mirage19–17-0.0215%22 May
mirage13–8-0.0414%21 May
ancient17–19-0.0116%20 May
mirage13–100.0130%19 May
dust213–110.0316%19 May
mirage16–19-0.0525%18 May
anubis16–14-0.033%18 May
anubis13–7-0.0018%16 May
mirage13–6-0.0615%16 May
anubis13–6-0.0213%15 May
ancient13–11-0.048%15 May
anubis14–16-0.019%10 May
mirage13–4-0.0223%10 May
mirage14–160.0115%8 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →