everlast — CS2 Stats
76561199705975235[U:1:1745709507]Steam profile ↗1 game ban
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 4 median | Level 5 median | vs Level 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 51.0% | 42.5% | 44.2% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 10.9% | 11.2% | 11.2% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.23 | 0.99 | 1.04 | above |
| Match win rate | 57.9% | 44.2% | 45.3% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like donk 87% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 65 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 dust2 | B | 18 | 9–9 | 50% | 0.02 |
 cache | S | 11 | 8–3 | 73% | 0.03 |
 nuke | S | 10 | 8–2 | 80% | 0.06 |
 inferno | S | 9 | 6–3 | 67% | 0.02 |
 mirage | A | 9 | 5–4 | 56% | 0.03 |
 ancient | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.03 |
 overpass | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.08 |
 vertigo | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | -0.00 |
 anubis | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.02 |
Across the last 65 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust2 | 5 | 40% | 1.15 | 14.2 |
| Mirage | 5 | 20% | 1.11 | 20.0 |
| Cache | 2 | 100% | 1.93 | 17.0 |
| Inferno | 2 | 50% | 0.92 | 19.5 |
| Ancient | 2 | 50% | 0.89 | 16.5 |
| Anubis | 1 | 100% | 1.12 | 18.0 |
| Nuke | 1 | 100% | 1.29 | 18.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.5214 — below the 4 mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 7–13 | 0.09 | 21% | 27 Aug → | |
| inferno | 10–6 | 0.07 | 22% | 27 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.01 | 19% | 26 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–3 | 0.03 | 23% | 26 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.09 | 27% | 26 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | 0.08 | 28% | 26 Aug → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.03 | 16% | 24 Aug → | |
| overpass | 13–3 | 0.12 | 33% | 24 Aug → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.01 | 21% | 23 Aug → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.00 | 21% | 23 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | -0.02 | 17% | 23 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.03 | 34% | 23 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | -0.00 | 14% | 23 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.02 | 22% | 20 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | -0.03 | 29% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.03 | 21% | 20 Aug → | |
| inferno | 16–14 | -0.00 | 16% | 16 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | 0.04 | 21% | 16 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.05 | 33% | 16 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 7–13 | -0.07 | 29% | 16 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.09 | 28% | 16 Aug → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.03 | 31% | 15 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–16 | -0.01 | 23% | 15 Aug → | |
| cache | 6–13 | 0.10 | 26% | 15 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–10 | -0.02 | 24% | 14 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | 0.03 | 7% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.02 | 16% | 14 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–6 | 0.09 | 25% | 13 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.03 | 26% | 13 Aug → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.16 | 19% | 13 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–4 | 0.04 | 21% | 13 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | -0.02 | 9% | 12 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | 0.07 | 13% | 12 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–3 | 0.03 | 15% | 12 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–9 | 0.03 | 29% | 12 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.04 | 17% | 12 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.14 | 20% | 12 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | -0.04 | 18% | 12 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–4 | 0.03 | 14% | 12 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–8 | 0.05 | 22% | 12 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.07 | 11% | 11 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–0 | 0.07 | 26% | 10 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.03 | 18% | 10 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.01 | 17% | 10 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.14 | 18% | 9 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.12 | 14% | 9 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.08 | 22% | 9 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.04 | 23% | 9 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 13–1 | 0.03 | 23% | 9 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–1 | 0.00 | 10% | 9 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.12 | 26% | 8 Aug → | |
| cache | 11–13 | 0.02 | 24% | 8 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.05 | 16% | 7 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | -0.06 | 17% | 5 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 13–4 | -0.03 | 10% | 5 Aug → | |
| overpass | 7–0 | 0.04 | 13% | 5 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.03 | 22% | 24 Jun → | |
| cache | 4–13 | -0.10 | 6% | 24 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.09 | 11% | 19 Jun → | |
| inferno | 12–12 | -0.02 | 9% | 19 Jun → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.01 | 11% | 14 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 6–0 | 0.02 | 20% | 13 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | -0.01 | 18% | 13 Jun → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | -0.02 | 21% | 30 May → | |
| anubis | 3–13 | -0.02 | 6% | 30 May → |
Match data via Leetify.
