niketouz

niketouz — CS2 Stats

CA76561199693081973[U:1:1732816245]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

415Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
463Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (33 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+6Tracked matches · now 415
−3.3ppWin rate · 63.3% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,874 +0 13 Sept – 26 Sept · 2 observations
1,8741,874peak 1,87413 Sept26 Sept
1,874Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2024-05-25

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches12——
Win rate42%——
K/D0.95——
Headshot %43%——

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 29 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.0%48.2%50.9%2.9% short
Shot accuracy0.0%13.2%13.7%13.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.071.090.06 short
Match win rate54.1%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGniketouzFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,874csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning44
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–33Last 9465%Win rateLLLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 94 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.4
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time576ms−82ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 94 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 30 Mar →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · anubis, 20 Apr →
391msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 11 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 13 Jul →

Across the last 94 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 77% over 26ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S3424–1071%-0.01
mirageS2620–677%0.00
anubisS1712–571%-0.00
nukeC73–443%-0.03
ancientD72–529%-0.02
rush_001—10–10%-0.20
overpass—10–10%-0.04
inferno—10–10%-0.21

Across the last 94 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,998Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
453Matches
54.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 9 players
48.0%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,317MVPs
333Hours (in match)
477Bombs planted
302Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,466dust2
171nuke
120inferno
29vertigo
5train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

402Matches
55%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
71.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14058%0.9714.3
Dust212957%0.9613.9
Anubis7855%0.9713.8
Ancient2343%1.1115.2
Nuke1346%1.0014.5
Inferno956%0.9914.4
Cache560%0.8711.0
Overpass30%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
574msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
31.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.49HE damage / grenade
5.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5476% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.096%13 Oct →
dust28–130.1020%30 Sept →
rush_0014–8-0.200%30 Sept →
anubis13–100.0416%19 Sept →
dust212–160.0425%15 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0123%8 Sept →
nuke13–20.0411%7 Sept →
anubis13–40.0426%1 Sept →
dust213–50.0327%25 Aug →
mirage13–100.1016%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0516%25 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.052%15 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.090%14 Aug →
dust213–40.0916%13 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.027%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0417%12 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0517%12 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0713%11 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0132%11 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0318%7 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0425%2 Aug →
anubis16–130.0013%1 Aug →
anubis13–70.0229%27 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0232%20 Jul →
dust28–130.0118%8 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0718%8 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0218%7 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0532%7 Jul →
mirage13–110.0324%12 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0611%11 Oct →
dust213–90.0032%11 Oct →
dust213–90.0122%16 Sept →
overpass1–13-0.046%16 Sept →
mirage13–10.0111%13 Jul →
dust213–90.0012%10 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.055%6 Jul →
mirage13–50.0510%30 May →
dust213–11-0.0715%30 May →
anubis13–6-0.0216%26 May →
mirage13–8-0.065%25 May →
ancient13–100.0416%25 May →
dust213–5-0.0028%25 May →
anubis13–2-0.0011%25 May →
mirage13–70.0412%24 May →
mirage13–40.0519%12 May →
dust26–13-0.0718%10 May →
anubis3–130.0336%20 Apr →
anubis13–50.0210%12 Apr →
mirage13–70.0225%10 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0216%5 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0512%31 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0511%31 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0015%30 Mar →
mirage13–10.116%30 Mar →
nuke13–60.0112%30 Mar →
anubis16–14-0.0112%29 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0221%29 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0316%28 Mar →
dust213–90.0115%21 Mar →
dust213–3-0.0320%21 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0321%20 Mar →
dust213–4-0.043%20 Mar →
mirage13–50.0926%15 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0219%15 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0010%12 Mar →
dust213–100.0329%12 Mar →
dust213–50.0223%11 Mar →
dust213–50.0123%11 Mar →
mirage13–70.0716%10 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0315%10 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0319%10 Mar →
dust216–14-0.0113%10 Mar →
anubis13–3-0.039%8 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0115%6 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0215%6 Mar →
ancient13–3-0.0610%6 Mar →
ancient17–19-0.0516%5 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0130%4 Mar →
inferno1–9-0.2120%2 Mar →
anubis12–160.0519%1 Mar →
mirage19–22-0.0117%1 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0220%1 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0416%27 Feb →
nuke16–13-0.0420%27 Feb →
dust213–60.0214%27 Feb →
mirage13–40.0423%27 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0029%27 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.066%22 Feb →
nuke12–16-0.0829%21 Feb →
anubis13–9-0.0129%21 Feb →
dust213–70.0119%16 Feb →
anubis13–40.0422%13 Feb →
dust228–25-0.0716%13 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0210%25 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.