mediocrity

mediocrity — CS2 Stats

76561199651118537[U:1:1690852809]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

602Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,618Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,256Blue band · top ~48.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,256 -4,903 16 Sept – 13 Nov · 16 days played
10,56019,413peak 19,41316 Sept13 Nov
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
15Days played since 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 8,157 below peak (19,413)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,744 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate40.4%44.8%45.7%5.3% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.031.050.11 short
Match win rate47.8%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmediocrityFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER11,256 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning38
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–37–3Last 10060%Win rateLWWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility6.7
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.83 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning3.8
Utility6.7
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time558ms+48ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 23 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 25 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · poseidon, 29 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 1 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
12–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 74% over 19cacheWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS1914–574%0.01
anubisS1711–665%0.02
nukeB168–850%0.01
ancientS1510–567%-0.00
infernoC125–742%-0.04
cacheD92–722%-0.03
dust2S75–271%0.04
vertigo—22–0100%0.07
poseidon—22–0100%0.18
debris—11–0100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

39,275Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,250Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
40.4%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
8,777MVPs
921Hours (in match)
3,079Bombs planted
520Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,627
AWP5,587
MP71,880
MAC-101,692
MP91,629

Lifetime map wins

2,469dust2
2,259nuke
2,151inferno
344vertigo
201train
52ar_shoots
23lake
13office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

155Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
86.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5052%1.1917.2
Anubis2458%1.0615.6
Ancient2152%1.3216.8
Nuke1942%1.1117.9
Dust21741%1.0014.8
Inferno1443%1.1216.7
Cache650%0.8714.2
Overpass450%0.8111.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
562msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
42.3%CT opening success
0.83Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
13.22HE damage / grenade
5.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7962% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0311%13 Nov →
mirage13–90.038%13 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0313%13 Nov →
ancient16–120.0217%13 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0214%13 Nov →
cache14–16-0.0512%12 Nov →
dust24–130.0119%12 Nov →
dust213–50.0717%12 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0714%12 Nov →
ancient13–8-0.059%12 Nov →
mirage13–110.0529%12 Nov →
anubis7–130.0320%12 Nov →
anubis11–130.088%10 Nov →
dust213–40.0212%10 Nov →
ancient13–8-0.0117%3 Nov →
cache2–13-0.0328%2 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.0210%2 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0422%2 Nov →
anubis13–9-0.0412%2 Nov →
mirage13–50.0710%2 Nov →
anubis16–12-0.0012%2 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0219%2 Nov →
mirage6–130.0024%2 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0216%1 Nov →
ancient13–90.0118%1 Nov →
ancient13–30.076%1 Nov →
cache3–13-0.0915%1 Nov →
mirage13–2-0.0214%1 Nov →
dust213–30.0724%1 Nov →
ancient13–110.0313%1 Nov →
nuke16–14-0.0113%1 Nov →
mirage13–50.0728%1 Nov →
inferno3–13-0.104%31 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0212%31 Oct →
anubis13–60.0717%31 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0118%30 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0424%30 Oct →
nuke8–80.0017%29 Oct →
nuke9–7-0.0623%29 Oct →
anubis13–80.0913%29 Oct →
vertigo9–60.1012%29 Oct →
poseidon9–60.1415%29 Oct →
debris9–40.1223%29 Oct →
cache11–130.019%29 Oct →
ancient8–130.0212%29 Oct →
nuke3–00.0825%29 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0017%29 Oct →
anubis8–130.0614%29 Oct →
mirage13–80.048%28 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0115%28 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0425%28 Oct →
nuke9–60.0411%28 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0515%28 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0925%28 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0321%28 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0121%27 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0312%27 Oct →
anubis13–90.0815%27 Oct →
anubis13–60.0217%27 Oct →
cache13–60.0223%27 Oct →
inferno16–140.0316%27 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0116%25 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.038%25 Oct →
mirage13–110.0813%25 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0217%25 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.1540%25 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.027%25 Oct →
inferno9–60.0319%25 Oct →
vertigo9–70.0415%25 Oct →
inferno9–10.107%25 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0312%25 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.1010%25 Oct →
nuke9–7-0.0711%25 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0210%25 Oct →
nuke13–60.1113%24 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0211%24 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.1012%24 Oct →
ancient13–90.0320%24 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.009%24 Oct →
anubis13–20.1629%24 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0523%24 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0522%24 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0119%24 Oct →
anubis13–50.0027%24 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0110%24 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0323%24 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.029%23 Oct →
mirage15–150.0116%23 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0615%23 Oct →
mirage13–20.014%23 Oct →
anubis13–50.0216%23 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.1215%23 Oct →
nuke9–10.346%23 Oct →
poseidon9–10.2327%23 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.1024%23 Oct →
ancient13–30.0727%23 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0811%23 Oct →
dust26–00.2217%22 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0015%22 Oct →
anubis13–100.0212%22 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.