Zilla

Zilla — CS2 Stats

76561199588753031[U:1:1628487303]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,272Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,847 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (34 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,847 → 1,847
+154Tracked matches · now 1,272
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,847 +0 7 Sept – 11 Sept · 2 observations
1,8471,847peak 1,8477 Sept11 Sept
1,847Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,847
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 154 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZillaFACEITLevel 10 · 1,847 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,847csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning82
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–45Last 10055%Win rateLLWLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.3
Positioning8.2
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 68% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 68% on CT to 51% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning8.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time493ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 507ms → last ⅓ avg 493ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 1–3 · nuke, 25 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 24 Sept →
320msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 13 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 72% over 29anubisWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2921–872%0.01
dust2A2212–1055%0.01
anubisC176–1135%0.01
ancientB136–746%0.01
infernoA85–363%0.04
cacheB84–450%0.01
nuke—31–233%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,081Matches
50%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
82.5ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage34654%1.2017.3
Dust220445%1.1817.1
Inferno15049%1.3417.6
Ancient13544%1.1617.4
Nuke8455%1.3117.1
Anubis8147%1.2017.1
Overpass4349%1.2416.5
Cache2157%1.1817.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
495msReaction time
50.9%T opening success
67.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
5.71HE damage / grenade
7.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0120%15 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0425%15 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0422%15 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0125%14 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0428%14 Oct →
mirage13–110.0129%13 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0121%12 Oct →
ancient16–140.0326%12 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0219%11 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0139%10 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0121%9 Oct →
inferno13–80.0823%8 Oct →
dust213–80.0535%7 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0732%7 Oct →
dust29–130.0221%5 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0925%4 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0326%4 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0225%4 Oct →
dust213–70.0839%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0118%1 Oct →
anubis13–90.0823%1 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0120%1 Oct →
mirage13–40.1019%1 Oct →
ancient7–130.0119%30 Sept →
dust213–40.0222%30 Sept →
cache13–60.1424%30 Sept →
anubis13–90.0617%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.1234%30 Sept →
anubis9–130.0726%30 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0218%30 Sept →
mirage13–110.0421%29 Sept →
cache13–50.0627%29 Sept →
ancient19–170.0826%28 Sept →
mirage13–40.1121%28 Sept →
mirage13–70.0021%28 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0325%28 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0130%28 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0319%27 Sept →
ancient10–130.0425%27 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0235%26 Sept →
inferno13–70.1336%26 Sept →
mirage13–10.0833%26 Sept →
mirage13–100.0330%25 Sept →
dust213–110.0534%25 Sept →
inferno8–130.0534%25 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0127%25 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0726%25 Sept →
mirage10–130.0016%25 Sept →
nuke1–30.2323%25 Sept →
dust28–130.0722%25 Sept →
dust210–130.0147%24 Sept →
ancient16–130.0745%22 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0030%21 Sept →
ancient13–30.0827%21 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0320%21 Sept →
mirage10–130.0222%18 Sept →
mirage13–30.0530%18 Sept →
anubis11–130.0825%17 Sept →
mirage16–130.0122%16 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0117%15 Sept →
mirage10–130.0418%15 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0425%15 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0731%15 Sept →
dust213–80.0128%15 Sept →
mirage13–80.0835%15 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0738%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0826%15 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0319%14 Sept →
cache11–130.0219%14 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0717%14 Sept →
mirage13–110.0320%13 Sept →
cache15–190.0429%13 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0622%12 Sept →
inferno13–40.0522%12 Sept →
anubis13–40.0731%12 Sept →
anubis16–130.0429%12 Sept →
dust220–22-0.0136%12 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0423%11 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0126%11 Sept →
mirage19–17-0.0329%11 Sept →
dust213–10.0624%11 Sept →
ancient13–20.0332%11 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0131%10 Sept →
anubis9–130.0325%9 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0127%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.0332%9 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0227%9 Sept →
anubis10–130.0029%23 Aug →
dust213–80.0132%22 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0415%22 Aug →
dust213–160.0829%21 Aug →
inferno16–130.0335%21 Aug →
cache13–100.0124%21 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0423%20 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0224%20 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0617%9 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0330%30 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0620%29 Jul →
dust213–90.0432%29 Jul →
dust213–60.0929%29 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.