Lacylagersjef

Lacylagersjef — CS2 Stats

76561199569185756[U:1:1608920028]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,302Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,493Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71935 of 242650 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,562 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 19 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,493 -111 19 Jun – 24 Sept · 10 days played
19,87220,604peak 20,60419 Jun24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,562 +0 29 Aug – 24 Sept · 2 observations
1,5621,562peak 1,56229 Aug24 Sept
20,965Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,562Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-06-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,562
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 189 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 111 below peak (20,604)
  • -59 over 30 days · steady
  • -111 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,507 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLacylagersjefFACEITLevel 8 · 1,562 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,493 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,562csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning57
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 476ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.7
Utility6.8
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time503ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 503ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 24 Jun →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–16 · nuke, 30 Jul →
336msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 6 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 24 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 15cacheWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2715–1256%0.00
nukeD217–1433%-0.01
anubisS1511–473%0.02
infernoB158–753%0.00
cacheD144–1029%-0.00
dust2—43–175%-0.00
overpass—20–20%-0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.10
mirage—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

698Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
75.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient18054%1.0414.6
Nuke14853%1.0815.1
Inferno13153%1.0114.3
Anubis9947%1.0414.9
Dust23845%0.8612.3
Train3348%1.0415.5
Overpass2540%1.0115.7
Cache2425%0.8613.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
71.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
500msReaction time
43.6%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
9.18HE damage / grenade
8.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.369% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0117%19 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0220%19 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0313%19 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.047%18 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0312%18 Sept →
dust213–110.0421%18 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0014%8 Sept →
vertigo13–40.1028%6 Sept →
inferno13–70.0519%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0111%23 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0118%23 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0411%22 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.069%22 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0516%22 Aug →
nuke23–25-0.016%22 Aug →
inferno10–130.0711%19 Aug →
ancient22–200.0216%17 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0419%17 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0420%15 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.017%15 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0313%14 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0110%14 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0512%14 Aug →
anubis13–60.0610%14 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0413%13 Aug →
ancient13–70.019%13 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0012%13 Aug →
ancient10–130.0013%11 Aug →
cache8–13-0.1019%11 Aug →
anubis13–110.039%10 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0116%8 Aug →
cache11–130.0426%8 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.059%8 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0213%8 Aug →
inferno5–130.0025%8 Aug →
inferno8–130.0515%6 Aug →
cache8–130.0314%6 Aug →
dust213–50.0111%6 Aug →
nuke13–70.0223%6 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0114%6 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0213%6 Aug →
anubis13–50.0826%5 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0614%4 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.015%4 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0323%4 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0513%1 Aug →
anubis13–80.0113%1 Aug →
ancient13–80.0822%1 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0329%1 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0311%1 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.1319%31 Jul →
ancient13–90.0019%30 Jul →
cache13–20.0728%30 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0117%30 Jul →
nuke10–130.0718%30 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0017%30 Jul →
anubis13–100.0515%30 Jul →
ancient16–130.0116%30 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0238%30 Jul →
anubis13–40.0531%30 Jul →
cache7–130.0019%28 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0722%24 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0025%23 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0223%23 Jul →
inferno13–50.0615%22 Jul →
ancient13–80.019%22 Jul →
cache9–130.0417%22 Jul →
ancient13–70.046%22 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0417%22 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0314%16 Jul →
inferno25–23-0.0022%14 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0816%14 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0213%14 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.059%14 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0326%13 Jul →
ancient13–90.0415%13 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0014%10 Jul →
ancient6–130.0213%10 Jul →
nuke13–30.1030%10 Jul →
cache13–10.1024%10 Jul →
anubis13–20.0711%10 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0226%10 Jul →
cache13–80.0331%8 Jul →
inferno13–80.029%8 Jul →
nuke13–30.0422%8 Jul →
overpass11–13-0.0322%24 Jun →
nuke10–130.019%24 Jun →
anubis13–00.1626%24 Jun →
ancient13–70.1423%24 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0019%23 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0317%23 Jun →
ancient8–130.0116%23 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0313%20 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0710%20 Jun →
inferno13–100.0114%20 Jun →
nuke13–80.0417%20 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0120%20 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0123%20 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0719%19 Jun →
nuke13–16-0.0213%19 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →