Shiriken

Shiriken — CS2 Stats

NO76561197961245759[U:1:980031]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

900Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,660Purple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#96911 of 242651 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 8 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,660 +4,791 8 Jun – 24 Sept · 34 days played
13,21019,202peak 19,2028 Jun24 Sept
19,364Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,145Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-06-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 542 below peak (19,202)
  • +1,131 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,450 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,340 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShirikenFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,660 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,145csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning57
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility5.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.7
Utility5.9
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time555ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy11.0%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 8.8% → last ⅓ avg 11.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 17 Jul →
24%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 13 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 19 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 38% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2610–1638%-0.00
infernoB2010–1050%0.01
ancientS1711–665%0.01
cacheA127–558%0.00
anubisA127–558%-0.00
mirageS86–275%0.02
dust2—42–250%0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

270Matches
53%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
70.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7054%0.9514.2
Nuke5461%0.9913.8
Inferno5052%0.9613.5
Anubis3352%0.9314.0
Mirage2335%0.8612.1
Overpass1644%0.8313.4
Dust2850%0.7711.9
Cache743%0.9414.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.6%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
553msReaction time
45.3%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
11.79HE damage / grenade
4.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.6221% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0411%23 Sept →
anubis9–130.0210%22 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.077%19 Sept →
inferno13–40.055%18 Sept →
anubis13–50.0011%18 Sept →
inferno10–130.0016%17 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.1011%17 Sept →
anubis13–100.0110%17 Sept →
ancient13–60.016%17 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.018%15 Sept →
cache13–00.0713%15 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.029%15 Sept →
dust28–130.0214%15 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0114%14 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.045%14 Sept →
nuke10–130.029%14 Sept →
ancient13–90.057%14 Sept →
inferno16–140.0315%12 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0519%12 Sept →
cache13–70.0513%11 Sept →
inferno13–50.1116%11 Sept →
inferno13–90.027%11 Sept →
anubis8–130.066%7 Sept →
nuke13–100.065%7 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0123%7 Sept →
anubis13–30.0318%5 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0111%5 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.014%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0410%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0510%28 Aug →
dust213–50.0122%28 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.015%27 Aug →
mirage13–80.0416%23 Aug →
ancient22–20-0.0410%17 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.070%17 Aug →
cache13–60.054%15 Aug →
mirage13–110.0114%15 Aug →
dust29–130.0224%13 Aug →
inferno13–10.0311%10 Aug →
cache3–13-0.1113%10 Aug →
cache13–90.0811%10 Aug →
nuke13–80.0010%8 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0511%8 Aug →
nuke5–130.0113%8 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0410%7 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.026%7 Aug →
nuke13–90.0210%7 Aug →
nuke13–70.0313%3 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.017%3 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0711%3 Aug →
ancient13–60.023%31 Jul →
nuke9–130.048%31 Jul →
cache6–130.0413%31 Jul →
ancient13–20.087%31 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0318%30 Jul →
cache8–13-0.019%29 Jul →
cache16–13-0.056%28 Jul →
nuke3–130.0111%28 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.019%27 Jul →
mirage13–80.0710%26 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.076%26 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.0211%26 Jul →
inferno7–130.0210%24 Jul →
anubis6–8-0.0415%21 Jul →
cache13–110.0312%21 Jul →
anubis15–150.0011%21 Jul →
inferno13–90.1019%21 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.003%19 Jul →
ancient13–90.007%19 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.093%19 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0210%17 Jul →
ancient13–30.1512%17 Jul →
nuke13–60.024%17 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0018%17 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.023%10 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.024%10 Jul →
nuke13–30.0315%10 Jul →
cache13–10.0119%10 Jul →
anubis13–20.007%10 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0118%10 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.039%23 Jun →
inferno13–50.0511%23 Jun →
nuke11–130.018%23 Jun →
inferno13–20.067%23 Jun →
inferno13–90.046%22 Jun →
nuke12–16-0.018%22 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.004%22 Jun →
overpass13–80.047%19 Jun →
nuke9–130.0312%19 Jun →
ancient14–16-0.006%19 Jun →
ancient13–70.032%19 Jun →
inferno15–150.045%19 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.023%16 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.039%13 Jun →
mirage13–110.128%13 Jun →
ancient13–80.0412%11 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0214%8 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0111%8 Jun →
ancient13–90.099%8 Jun →
inferno13–20.0414%8 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →