evgrabus

evgrabus — CS2 Stats

76561199551214522[U:1:1590948794]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

250Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
120Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating5,595Light Blue band · top ~76% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,595 +1,051 23 Jul18 Sept · 41 days played
3,5736,400peak 6,40023 Jul18 Sept
6,400Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 805 below peak (6,400)
  • +192 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 4,405 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,059), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate46.3%39.9%41.9%above
Shot accuracy1.4%6.8%9.6%8.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.630.910.980.35 short
Match win rate40.1%42.3%43.8%3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGevgrabusPREMIER5,595 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning44
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45487Last 10045%Win rateLLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim4.5
Utility3.9
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels3.7

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.4
Utility3.9
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time599ms−88ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 23 Jul
33%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 18 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 17 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 8 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24121250%-0.03
ancientC1881044%-0.01
mirageC156940%-0.02
infernoD134931%-0.06
anubisA127558%-0.02
nukeB105550%-0.05
cacheC73443%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,746Lifetime kills
0.63K/D
406Matches
40.1%Match win rate
46.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Light Blue band
1.4%Shot accuracy
791MVPs
120Hours (in match)
184Bombs planted
55Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

626dust2
472nuke
471inferno
23train
19vertigo
14office
4cbble
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
65.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
589msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
5.88HE damage / grenade
8.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2559% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0820%17 Sept
anubis6–13-0.095%14 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0715%11 Sept
nuke16–12-0.0822%10 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0330%10 Sept
ancient13–50.0919%9 Sept
dust27–13-0.0521%7 Sept
anubis10–13-0.038%7 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0115%6 Sept
mirage13–40.0024%6 Sept
cache2–13-0.0121%6 Sept
inferno13–11-0.026%6 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0120%6 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0319%5 Sept
dust213–8-0.0014%5 Sept
dust211–13-0.0910%5 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0714%5 Sept
anubis13–11-0.024%4 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0715%4 Sept
dust213–100.0317%1 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0321%1 Sept
dust21–13-0.1019%1 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0521%31 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0413%31 Aug
cache13–20.0616%30 Aug
anubis13–100.0311%30 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0612%30 Aug
dust211–130.0419%30 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0115%29 Aug
dust213–5-0.0111%29 Aug
nuke6–9-0.1319%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0818%27 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0511%25 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0711%24 Aug
cache11–13-0.0513%23 Aug
dust213–9-0.0915%23 Aug
dust213–100.0618%23 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0217%23 Aug
mirage15–150.0324%22 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0313%21 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0813%21 Aug
ancient3–9-0.0511%21 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0619%20 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0611%20 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0629%19 Aug
dust22–13-0.0613%19 Aug
anubis16–12-0.0210%18 Aug
mirage3–130.0133%18 Aug
dust27–13-0.0910%18 Aug
cache10–130.017%16 Aug
dust213–110.0213%16 Aug
inferno7–9-0.1212%16 Aug
ancient13–30.0712%16 Aug
anubis11–13-0.028%16 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0120%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0413%15 Aug
mirage5–13-0.069%15 Aug
dust213–7-0.1012%15 Aug
mirage13–80.038%14 Aug
dust215–15-0.0717%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0914%14 Aug
dust26–13-0.0322%14 Aug
anubis13–30.0714%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.053%13 Aug
mirage16–12-0.029%8 Aug
mirage13–10.0521%8 Aug
anubis13–9-0.009%8 Aug
ancient3–130.0115%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0921%7 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0517%7 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0417%7 Aug
vertigo2–9-0.159%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0710%6 Aug
dust29–10.0715%6 Aug
cache13–10-0.089%4 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0015%4 Aug
inferno4–9-0.2513%4 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0211%2 Aug
dust211–70.0711%2 Aug
dust213–110.0012%2 Aug
dust213–90.0520%2 Aug
dust26–13-0.1116%1 Aug
ancient10–130.016%1 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0913%30 Jul
cache13–8-0.028%29 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0812%28 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0313%27 Jul
dust24–13-0.1223%27 Jul
inferno9–4-0.0713%26 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0511%26 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0420%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0216%26 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0319%26 Jul
mirage13–100.0118%26 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0813%25 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0519%25 Jul
ancient4–13-0.078%25 Jul
dust213–90.0625%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0423%23 Jul
inferno9–30.1130%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →