aCKe

aCKe — CS2 Stats

FI76561199548311339[U:1:1588045611]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,701Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,498Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33493 of 221493 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,178 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 14 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,498 +1,063 16 Jul14 Sept · 7 days played
22,43524,432peak 24,43216 Jul14 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,178 +0 2 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
1,1781,178peak 1,1782 Sept3 Sept
24,432Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,178Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,178
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 23 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 934 below peak (24,432)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,502 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaCKeFACEITLevel 6 · 1,178 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,498 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,178csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning47
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44542Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.7
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time553ms−118ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 28 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 5–6 · vertigo, 21 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 6 Aug
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 6 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
911In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C25101540%-0.00
infernoC1981142%-0.02
mirageB168850%-0.02
nukeB105550%-0.00
anubisD82625%-0.00
cacheC83538%-0.00
ancientS65183%0.00
vertigo41325%0.01
train32167%-0.00
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

140Matches
51%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
72.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3537%0.9213.9
Dust22966%1.0715.0
Ancient2148%1.0013.4
Nuke1662%1.1313.0
Anubis1338%1.0513.6
Inferno1354%1.0412.8
Overpass580%0.9012.4
Cache560%0.9412.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
546msReaction time
32.6%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
10.25HE damage / grenade
16.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6109% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–130.0217%14 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0119%14 Sept
dust213–11-0.0416%13 Sept
dust28–13-0.0312%13 Sept
anubis5–130.0714%13 Sept
dust211–130.0012%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0217%10 Sept
mirage13–50.0216%10 Sept
anubis4–13-0.064%10 Sept
ancient13–80.0113%10 Sept
mirage13–10-0.027%9 Sept
dust213–40.0221%8 Sept
mirage14–16-0.077%8 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0529%8 Sept
dust213–160.0117%8 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0410%7 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0012%2 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0118%2 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0117%2 Sept
dust210–13-0.0318%1 Sept
mirage1–5-0.160%1 Sept
inferno14–160.0219%28 Aug
anubis13–30.1016%28 Aug
dust22–130.0631%28 Aug
nuke13–100.0221%28 Aug
inferno13–90.018%27 Aug
dust28–130.0118%27 Aug
anubis2–13-0.064%24 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0219%21 Aug
vertigo5–60.0443%21 Aug
cache7–13-0.0417%21 Aug
nuke13–7-0.037%10 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0513%10 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0421%10 Aug
cache11–130.0016%10 Aug
nuke9–130.0020%9 Aug
cache13–50.0315%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.038%9 Aug
dust213–11-0.0513%9 Aug
inferno7–9-0.1310%9 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0310%6 Aug
ancient13–20.0217%6 Aug
cache13–9-0.056%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.057%6 Aug
inferno7–13-0.057%6 Aug
dust27–130.0215%6 Aug
overpass2–13-0.0524%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0117%5 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0618%5 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0515%5 Aug
dust213–8-0.0517%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0313%5 Aug
train13–11-0.0114%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0211%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0115%5 Aug
dust212–12-0.0614%5 Aug
vertigo9–130.0113%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0521%4 Aug
cache14–160.028%3 Aug
ancient13–60.0313%3 Aug
inferno12–120.0412%1 Aug
dust27–130.0120%1 Aug
vertigo13–80.0613%1 Aug
dust210–130.0812%1 Aug
train7–130.0212%1 Aug
dust213–6-0.0421%1 Aug
mirage13–100.0213%31 Jul
inferno13–50.024%31 Jul
inferno2–9-0.190%31 Jul
ancient7–130.008%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0315%31 Jul
nuke5–130.0014%31 Jul
inferno13–110.0511%31 Jul
inferno13–40.089%30 Jul
dust216–14-0.028%30 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0213%30 Jul
train13–11-0.0215%29 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0510%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0317%29 Jul
inferno3–13-0.082%28 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0712%28 Jul
dust213–90.0220%28 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.059%28 Jul
mirage13–40.0920%28 Jul
inferno13–60.045%28 Jul
mirage11–130.0315%28 Jul
inferno13–5-0.019%28 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0314%27 Jul
dust22–7-0.0323%26 Jul
nuke13–100.034%26 Jul
dust22–20.0218%26 Jul
cache13–110.0424%25 Jul
anubis13–50.0115%25 Jul
cache4–130.0114%25 Jul
dust213–100.0124%25 Jul
dust213–70.0512%16 Jul
nuke13–40.0810%16 Jul
inferno19–220.0619%15 Jul
dust213–70.0914%15 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0216%14 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →