aCKe

aCKe — CS2 Stats

FI76561199548311339[U:1:1588045611]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,793Tracked matches60%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,610Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48578 of 260012 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,178 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,610 -1,117 13 Sept – 2 Nov · 12 days played
21,56223,727peak 23,72713 Sept2 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,178 +0 2 Sept – 23 Oct · 4 observations
1,1781,178peak 1,1782 Sept23 Oct
23,727Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,178Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,178
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 23 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,117 below peak (23,727)
  • +301 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,390 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaCKeFACEITLevel 7 · 1,178 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,610 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,178csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning53
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–50Last 10050%Win rateWWWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility7.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.3
Utility7.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time579ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 2 Nov →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 16 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 12 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2714–1352%-0.00
mirageB199–1047%-0.03
anubisC166–1038%0.01
ancientA106–460%-0.00
nukeA95–456%0.01
cacheB84–450%0.02
infernoB84–450%-0.00
vertigo—22–0100%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

168Matches
55%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24166%1.0715.4
Mirage3639%0.9113.8
Ancient2446%0.9913.3
Nuke1968%1.1413.7
Inferno1759%1.1112.8
Anubis1547%1.1414.6
Cache862%0.9813.5
Overpass580%0.9012.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
579msReaction time
52.0%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
8.85HE damage / grenade
16.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3238% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.7268% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.119%5 Nov →
mirage16–14-0.0316%5 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.018%5 Nov →
anubis13–70.0013%5 Nov →
dust214–16-0.036%5 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0110%2 Nov →
anubis16–120.009%2 Nov →
vertigo13–8-0.0423%2 Nov →
anubis13–40.1418%2 Nov →
dust213–7-0.018%2 Nov →
ancient13–60.0215%1 Nov →
cache16–13-0.0117%1 Nov →
anubis2–13-0.0914%29 Oct →
mirage13–60.0611%29 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.018%29 Oct →
cache13–7-0.038%29 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0220%29 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0218%28 Oct →
dust213–10-0.036%28 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0017%28 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0716%28 Oct →
ancient13–100.1113%28 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0425%28 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0014%27 Oct →
anubis13–20.0112%27 Oct →
mirage13–110.034%27 Oct →
anubis10–130.0117%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0118%27 Oct →
cache4–130.0027%27 Oct →
dust213–50.0215%26 Oct →
dust213–60.0919%26 Oct →
vertigo13–100.019%22 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0323%22 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.056%22 Oct →
inferno13–70.0319%18 Oct →
dust216–140.0122%18 Oct →
cache10–130.059%18 Oct →
inferno11–00.0312%18 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0311%18 Oct →
dust213–90.0420%17 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0212%17 Oct →
dust213–90.0318%16 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0533%16 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0316%12 Oct →
cache13–80.0112%9 Oct →
nuke13–70.0514%9 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0423%8 Oct →
inferno13–80.0215%8 Oct →
cache9–130.0112%8 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.068%8 Oct →
overpass2–11-0.0112%8 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0214%8 Oct →
anubis4–130.016%7 Oct →
dust211–30.0520%7 Oct →
nuke13–40.0713%7 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0411%7 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0212%6 Oct →
ancient16–120.0111%6 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0116%6 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0524%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0519%1 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0422%1 Oct →
anubis11–130.0116%29 Sept →
cache13–90.0416%28 Sept →
dust216–140.0018%28 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0517%28 Sept →
anubis6–130.0011%26 Sept →
mirage0–9-0.0411%26 Sept →
cache8–130.0623%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0615%23 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0317%23 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0125%23 Sept →
nuke8–130.0615%23 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0714%23 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0026%23 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0013%23 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.048%23 Sept →
nuke8–130.0217%14 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0119%14 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0416%13 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0312%13 Sept →
anubis5–130.0714%13 Sept →
dust211–130.0012%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0217%10 Sept →
mirage13–50.0216%10 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.064%10 Sept →
ancient13–80.0113%10 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.027%9 Sept →
dust213–40.0221%8 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.077%8 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0529%8 Sept →
dust213–160.0117%8 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0410%7 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0012%2 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0118%2 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0117%2 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0318%1 Sept →
mirage1–5-0.160%1 Sept →
inferno14–160.0219%28 Aug →
anubis13–30.1016%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.