𝗡𝗘𝗢𝗪𝗔𝗥𝗘 — CS2 Stats

CF76561199542479967[U:1:1582214239]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

423Tracked matches83%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating23,667Top 25% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#36530 of 261485 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 423 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,667 +7,567 14 Nov – 26 Oct · 10 days played

23,667Peak Premier in tracked matches

24Days played since 2023-09-19

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 23,667
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,333 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-10-26
Purple band first seen 2026-10-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning50

Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT72–24–4Last 10072%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.18 avg rating · −26.1pp headshot accuracy · −221ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.18), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.06
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 361ms

Last 10

8–2 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.06
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 319ms

Last 20

14–5–1 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 33%
Avg reaction 429ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim9.5

Utility2.9

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels4.3

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 0% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning5.0

Utility2.9

Mechanics4.6

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time444ms−81ms

first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 444ms

Headshot accuracy42.1%+14.1%

first ⅓ avg 28.0% → last ⅓ avg 42.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 14 Nov →

82%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 2 Dec →

250msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · vertigo, 15 Nov →

13–1Biggest win · overpass, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak

W3Current streak

7–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 18ancientWeakest map · 58% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
vertigo	S	20	13–7	65%	0.04
mirage	S	18	15–3	83%	0.07
overpass	S	17	13–4	76%	0.06
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	0.06
inferno	S	12	10–2	83%	0.06
ancient	A	12	7–5	58%	0.03
dust2	—	4	3–1	75%	0.09
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (58% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

40.0%Headshot accuracy

32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.5%Spray accuracy

70.6%Counter-strafing

7.2°Preaim

437msReaction time

0.0%T opening success

50.2%CT opening success

0.28Enemies flashed / flash

8.0%Flash assists

5.63HE damage / grenade

1.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2844 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 0% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–4	0.03	9%	16 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	0.02	25%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	32%	15 Jul →
nuke	0–9	-0.25	0%	19 Mar →
inferno	13–10	-0.13	0%	19 Mar →
mirage	0–13	-0.15	0%	29 Feb →
vertigo	13–11	-0.16	0%	24 Feb →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	44%	20 Feb →
nuke	9–6	0.02	42%	8 Feb →
nuke	9–7	0.04	50%	8 Feb →
vertigo	9–7	0.17	53%	8 Feb →
nuke	9–5	0.13	50%	8 Feb →
ancient	10–13	0.07	58%	8 Feb →
anubis	13–10	0.08	45%	8 Feb →
inferno	4–9	-0.12	73%	4 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.18	41%	4 Feb →
dust2	12–12	0.13	40%	4 Feb →
nuke	4–13	0.19	51%	4 Feb →
inferno	9–4	0.28	31%	1 Feb →
nuke	13–2	0.13	22%	31 Jan →
overpass	13–8	0.05	76%	2 Dec →
mirage	13–8	0.07	82%	2 Dec →
overpass	13–8	0.15	69%	2 Dec →
vertigo	13–9	0.13	62%	23 Nov →
overpass	13–5	0.12	61%	23 Nov →
nuke	13–6	0.04	33%	23 Nov →
mirage	13–7	0.17	67%	15 Nov →
vertigo	3–13	0.08	75%	15 Nov →
vertigo	1–13	-0.11	57%	14 Nov →
mirage	13–8	0.33	66%	14 Nov →
inferno	13–11	0.01	38%	14 Nov →
mirage	13–5	0.05	20%	28 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.01	20%	28 Sept →
overpass	13–2	0.02	16%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–2	0.21	18%	28 Sept →
vertigo	9–4	0.11	31%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.10	40%	27 Sept →
inferno	11–6	0.07	7%	27 Sept →
overpass	13–8	0.07	47%	27 Sept →
nuke	4–13	0.02	18%	27 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	0.03	34%	27 Sept →
overpass	13–11	0.04	45%	27 Sept →
inferno	13–3	0.05	38%	27 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.11	26%	27 Sept →
vertigo	13–3	0.12	41%	26 Sept →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	30%	26 Sept →
anubis	13–16	0.03	17%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.06	25%	24 Sept →
overpass	13–9	0.04	17%	24 Sept →
vertigo	2–13	0.08	27%	24 Sept →
nuke	15–15	0.03	22%	24 Sept →
overpass	13–2	0.13	31%	24 Sept →
ancient	15–15	0.06	27%	23 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.10	28%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.15	27%	23 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.13	53%	23 Sept →
overpass	0–13	0.02	31%	23 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.05	36%	23 Sept →
overpass	10–13	0.11	17%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.01	16%	23 Sept →
inferno	13–2	0.11	80%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.08	39%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.08	16%	23 Sept →
vertigo	16–12	0.04	45%	22 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.04	48%	22 Sept →
vertigo	6–13	0.10	39%	22 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.04	21%	22 Sept →
vertigo	16–12	0.01	26%	22 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.07	30%	22 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.06	26%	22 Sept →
vertigo	15–15	0.06	25%	22 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.08	20%	22 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.08	27%	21 Sept →
overpass	7–13	0.02	32%	21 Sept →
ancient	8–13	0.05	39%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.04	19%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	20%	21 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	37%	21 Sept →
overpass	13–6	0.10	41%	21 Sept →
vertigo	13–7	0.11	34%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.12	44%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.10	20%	21 Sept →
overpass	13–1	0.05	25%	20 Sept →
overpass	13–2	0.04	28%	20 Sept →
mirage	5–1	0.01	19%	20 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.10	20%	20 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	14%	20 Sept →
vertigo	6–13	-0.05	20%	20 Sept →
ancient	13–16	-0.03	32%	20 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.06	27%	20 Sept →
overpass	13–7	0.01	43%	20 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.00	33%	20 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	26%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–3	0.14	44%	20 Sept →
overpass	16–12	0.07	29%	19 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.11	38%	19 Sept →
mirage	14–16	0.04	20%	19 Sept →
overpass	5–13	-0.03	17%	19 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	0.09	22%	19 Sept →
vertigo	13–10	-0.01	28%	19 Sept →