Zander

Zander — CS2 Stats

AU76561199525099166[U:1:1564833438]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,463Tracked matches66%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,303Hours in CS46Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating8.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,777Top 1% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1631 of 259075 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,193 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,777 +5,131 30 Aug – 29 Oct · 26 days played
23,64628,777peak 28,77730 Aug29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,193 +0 30 Aug – 17 Oct · 5 observations
2,1932,193peak 2,19330 Aug17 Oct
29,196Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,193Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,193
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 307 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,777
  • +1,541 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,223 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate59.4%50.9%
Shot accuracy1.3%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.591.09
Match win rate53.2%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZanderFACEITLevel 10 · 2,193 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,777 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,193csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning76
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–36–2Last 10062%Win rateWLLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility4.7
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 80% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 80% on T to 53% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning7.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels7.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time503ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 514ms → last ⅓ avg 503ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.40Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 15 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · inferno, 25 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 24 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
14–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 18ancientWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3222–1069%0.02
infernoS1814–478%0.09
ancientD165–1131%0.00
dust2A149–564%0.02
cacheB105–550%0.02
anubisA53–260%0.06
nuke—32–167%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.15
train—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

154,519Lifetime kills
1.59K/D · Top 5% of Level 10 players
4,447Matches
53.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
59.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
1.3%Shot accuracy
17,398MVPs
2,425Hours (in match)
4,909Bombs planted
3,252Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4786,232
AWP23,414
MP92,316
Knife1,160

Lifetime map wins

8,117inferno
7,008dust2
3,265vertigo
3,098nuke
1,270train
129office
3ar_shoots
1lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,218Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
84.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage39949%1.1517.1
Ancient17450%1.1616.8
Inferno10952%1.1916.8
Anubis10350%1.1716.8
Dust27957%1.2017.3
Overpass7658%1.3317.4
Vertigo6549%1.0315.9
Nuke3040%1.0114.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
502msReaction time
79.6%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
9.73HE damage / grenade
4.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–140.0421%29 Oct →
ancient14–160.0620%29 Oct →
inferno9–130.0110%29 Oct →
dust213–80.0331%29 Oct →
inferno13–70.0514%29 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0319%29 Oct →
ancient13–20.0727%29 Oct →
mirage13–80.0118%28 Oct →
anubis13–110.0836%28 Oct →
mirage13–40.0730%28 Oct →
cache8–130.0332%28 Oct →
anubis10–130.0119%27 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0327%27 Oct →
dust213–60.0919%27 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0115%27 Oct →
mirage13–60.0421%27 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0221%26 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0231%26 Oct →
mirage13–40.0613%26 Oct →
dust213–90.0427%26 Oct →
dust215–150.0112%26 Oct →
ancient13–110.0311%25 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0018%24 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0125%24 Oct →
mirage16–140.0018%23 Oct →
inferno9–10.3132%21 Oct →
mirage13–90.0114%21 Oct →
mirage10–130.0219%21 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0824%21 Oct →
overpass13–10.1524%20 Oct →
inferno9–70.0124%20 Oct →
inferno9–20.2022%20 Oct →
inferno9–60.0920%20 Oct →
anubis13–110.0631%20 Oct →
anubis13–100.056%20 Oct →
mirage13–60.0312%19 Oct →
mirage19–220.0719%17 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0418%17 Oct →
inferno9–40.1832%17 Oct →
inferno9–10.2631%17 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.0343%17 Oct →
inferno9–5-0.0424%15 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0842%15 Oct →
inferno9–10.4048%15 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0238%15 Oct →
inferno9–20.2520%14 Oct →
inferno9–40.1317%14 Oct →
inferno9–00.0724%14 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0521%14 Oct →
mirage13–100.0610%14 Oct →
ancient8–130.0219%14 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0522%12 Oct →
dust22–30.0613%12 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0015%12 Oct →
cache13–30.0624%11 Oct →
mirage13–110.0524%11 Oct →
cache6–130.0117%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0615%8 Oct →
dust216–140.0815%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.1118%8 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0424%7 Oct →
ancient7–130.0323%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.0924%5 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0418%4 Oct →
mirage3–130.0125%4 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0113%3 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0315%3 Oct →
ancient23–250.0213%1 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0211%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0317%1 Oct →
ancient3–130.0626%1 Oct →
cache13–90.0032%30 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0335%30 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0119%30 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0429%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0218%29 Sept →
mirage19–16-0.0112%29 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0413%28 Sept →
mirage13–50.099%27 Sept →
ancient10–130.0215%27 Sept →
inferno0–3-0.04100%25 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0239%24 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0315%24 Sept →
cache16–140.0614%23 Sept →
cache13–30.1026%23 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.024%23 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0223%23 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0312%20 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0222%20 Sept →
anubis4–130.0818%20 Sept →
train13–100.0024%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.057%19 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0215%18 Sept →
mirage13–50.0324%17 Sept →
dust213–110.0428%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0818%17 Sept →
mirage16–140.0331%17 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0728%16 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0618%16 Sept →
mirage13–60.1420%16 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.