Embud

Embud — CS2 Stats

FI76561199521503161[U:1:1561237433]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

295Tracked matches59%Win rate2025Tracked since
605Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,654Blue band · top ~51.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Jul 2026 (77 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2831Premier CS Rating · 7,823 → 10,654
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 22 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,654 +5,754 22 Apr20 Sept · 37 days played
4,53210,654peak 10,65422 Apr20 Sept
10,654Peak Premier in tracked matches
53Days played since 2026-04-22

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,654
  • +2,908 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,346 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,169), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate34.4%41.9%42.7%8.3% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.3%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.210.980.99above
Match win rate46.0%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEmbudFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER10,654 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning56
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60364Last 10060%Win rateWLLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility4.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.6
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time643ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy8.8%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 8.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 18 May
33%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · mirage, 9 Jul
445msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 20 Aug
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 24 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 74% over 19cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA35201557%0.05
nukeS1914574%0.03
anubisB147750%0.02
ancientS128467%0.04
mirageC94544%0.02
cacheD62433%0.06
overpass330100%0.05
dust2220100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

13,583Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
828Matches
46.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
34.4%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,853MVPs
232Hours (in match)
771Bombs planted
166Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,273inferno
962nuke
423dust2
191vertigo
63train
13office
7ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
13%Win rate
0.75Avg K/D
69.4ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage40%0.487.5
Dust230%0.7411.7
Nuke250%0.9616.0
Anubis250%1.0414.5
Ancient20%0.6310.5
Train10%0.9212.0
Inferno10%0.9415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

8.4%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.3%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
638msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
62.0%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
4.78HE damage / grenade
7.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 8.3874% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.355 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.7873% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0717%20 Sept
anubis13–16-0.065%13 Sept
anubis11–130.029%20 Aug
inferno13–90.025%1 Aug
anubis13–40.056%25 Jul
ancient16–140.097%20 Jul
cache13–50.068%20 Jul
ancient13–6-0.003%18 Jul
anubis10–13-0.018%15 Jul
dust213–90.1210%15 Jul
inferno13–110.0812%12 Jul
cache2–13-0.017%12 Jul
nuke13–5-0.027%10 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0633%9 Jul
cache5–130.076%9 Jul
anubis13–60.124%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.033%8 Jul
cache12–120.035%8 Jul
inferno16–130.119%5 Jul
mirage13–90.118%4 Jul
anubis8–13-0.037%4 Jul
inferno13–50.1210%3 Jul
inferno13–60.028%3 Jul
nuke10–130.078%1 Jul
inferno11–13-0.028%30 Jun
anubis16–13-0.037%26 Jun
anubis11–130.117%26 Jun
mirage10–130.0516%22 Jun
mirage13–110.0413%20 Jun
overpass13–90.0410%17 Jun
nuke13–50.047%17 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0310%16 Jun
nuke13–80.057%16 Jun
nuke13–8-0.018%10 Jun
mirage7–130.0113%10 Jun
dust213–70.0613%8 Jun
inferno11–130.055%7 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0516%3 Jun
inferno13–20.0611%3 Jun
ancient13–40.075%1 Jun
inferno13–110.0910%31 May
nuke9–70.026%29 May
inferno5–9-0.0312%29 May
ancient5–13-0.008%28 May
mirage13–80.0611%28 May
inferno6–90.0114%28 May
mirage6–130.0311%27 May
nuke13–90.0416%27 May
inferno9–40.149%27 May
inferno9–60.085%27 May
inferno6–90.0513%27 May
inferno7–90.069%26 May
inferno9–40.0610%26 May
ancient11–130.088%25 May
inferno9–50.1112%25 May
inferno9–40.0710%25 May
ancient13–7-0.0310%24 May
nuke10–130.0118%23 May
inferno8–80.0215%22 May
cache13–40.2219%22 May
overpass13–100.058%21 May
nuke7–130.0213%21 May
inferno8–80.0623%21 May
inferno5–9-0.0711%20 May
anubis10–130.017%20 May
inferno8–80.0126%19 May
inferno9–50.0515%19 May
inferno9–20.2410%18 May
inferno9–50.0820%18 May
inferno10–130.0111%17 May
nuke13–7-0.0516%14 May
ancient8–130.0112%13 May
inferno11–130.0113%11 May
anubis13–100.017%10 May
nuke13–90.0610%6 May
overpass13–90.0714%5 May
mirage13–110.0110%5 May
anubis13–11-0.0118%4 May
nuke6–13-0.0311%4 May
ancient13–40.1217%4 May
nuke11–13-0.0316%27 Apr
anubis13–90.039%27 Apr
inferno9–30.2027%27 Apr
ancient12–6-0.0610%27 Apr
nuke13–110.0620%25 Apr
ancient13–4-0.004%25 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0113%25 Apr
nuke9–50.0717%25 Apr
anubis13–50.0411%24 Apr
inferno13–0-0.0112%24 Apr
ancient13–110.0711%24 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0210%23 Apr
ancient7–130.0813%23 Apr
inferno16–120.0812%22 Apr
nuke9–50.1216%22 Apr
nuke9–40.069%22 Apr
inferno9–60.1919%22 Apr
inferno4–9-0.1011%22 Apr
inferno1–9-0.1520%22 Apr
nuke9–70.0313%22 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →