slaktarn

slaktarn — CS2 Stats

76561199493395041[U:1:1533129313]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

854Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating18,696Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,696 -5,857 22 Mar – 8 Oct · 11 days played
18,69624,553peak 24,55322 Mar8 Oct
24,553Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2025-12-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,857 below peak (24,553)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,304 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGslaktarnFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,696 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning39
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateWLWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −9.7pp headshot accuracy · −85ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.4 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.7
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch9.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning3.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time576ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 27.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 5–0 · cache, 16 May →
61%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · overpass, 22 Mar →
352msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · nuke, 8 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
3–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 13anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3013–1743%-0.02
infernoC146–843%-0.01
dust2A138–562%0.01
cacheB137–654%0.01
nukeA95–456%0.01
ancientB63–350%0.01
anubisC52–340%-0.01
overpassA53–260%-0.02
sanctum—22–0100%0.07
poseidon—21–150%0.09
alpine—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

57Matches
65%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
78.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage367%1.0914.3
Ancient250%1.4621.5
Inferno20%1.0617.0
Anubis250%0.6611.0
Nuke1100%1.6725.0
Dust21100%1.1326.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
565msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
11.57HE damage / grenade
11.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.0893% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–10.0527%8 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0323%8 Oct →
nuke13–70.0121%8 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0721%8 Oct →
mirage13–60.0222%8 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0014%8 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0317%2 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0416%2 Oct →
anubis13–90.0015%2 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0427%2 Oct →
mirage13–10.0230%2 Oct →
anubis13–40.0418%2 Oct →
inferno13–90.0418%2 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0740%20 Jul →
mirage0–10-0.0812%12 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0150%10 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0126%10 Jul →
inferno12–16-0.0123%10 Jul →
cache13–70.0229%8 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0656%31 May →
mirage3–13-0.0733%16 May →
nuke1–130.0129%16 May →
cache2–110.0528%16 May →
cache13–5-0.060%16 May →
cache5–00.2647%16 May →
overpass9–00.060%14 May →
inferno10–13-0.0147%14 May →
cache13–60.0432%14 May →
overpass9–13-0.1027%10 May →
cache13–10-0.0620%9 May →
cache13–70.0133%3 May →
cache7–13-0.0642%2 May →
cache1–13-0.0817%2 May →
cache13–9-0.0219%2 May →
cache11–13-0.0240%2 May →
cache12–120.0726%1 May →
mirage14–16-0.0433%25 Apr →
mirage15–150.0636%25 Apr →
nuke13–60.0226%25 Apr →
ancient13–16-0.0218%25 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.0743%24 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0313%24 Apr →
mirage13–90.0326%24 Apr →
mirage13–90.0931%20 Apr →
inferno1–13-0.0721%20 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0130%17 Apr →
anubis2–13-0.0222%16 Apr →
ancient13–100.0719%12 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0320%9 Apr →
nuke16–130.0134%9 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0323%8 Apr →
mirage10–130.0113%8 Apr →
dust213–60.0534%8 Apr →
dust213–30.0829%2 Apr →
inferno9–20.0228%2 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0731%2 Apr →
sanctum9–60.1630%2 Apr →
sanctum9–4-0.0238%2 Apr →
poseidon9–00.1647%2 Apr →
dust214–160.0115%29 Mar →
mirage2–130.0115%29 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.049%29 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0713%29 Mar →
dust213–80.0229%29 Mar →
inferno5–9-0.0241%29 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0619%29 Mar →
alpine11–13-0.0829%29 Mar →
inferno13–90.0429%28 Mar →
mirage15–150.0118%28 Mar →
mirage13–1-0.0321%28 Mar →
poseidon8–80.0340%28 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0550%28 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0718%28 Mar →
mirage13–5-0.0312%28 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0221%27 Mar →
mirage2–1-0.020%27 Mar →
mirage3–11-0.0925%27 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0524%23 Mar →
nuke15–15-0.0636%23 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0021%23 Mar →
mirage1–7-0.0925%23 Mar →
ancient13–100.0418%22 Mar →
mirage13–50.0347%22 Mar →
overpass13–30.0661%22 Mar →
dust211–130.0320%21 Mar →
nuke10–130.0816%20 Mar →
mirage9–130.0440%20 Mar →
inferno13–60.0113%20 Mar →
nuke13–10-0.0338%20 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0934%20 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0230%20 Mar →
dust213–70.0543%20 Mar →
anubis4–130.0130%20 Mar →
dust216–120.0115%15 Mar →
dust213–60.0336%13 Mar →
ancient13–50.0122%13 Mar →
inferno13–50.0221%14 Dec →
mirage13–3-0.0736%14 Dec →
inferno13–10-0.0123%14 Dec →
dust213–9-0.0125%14 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.