𝚂𝙻𝙰𝚈𝙴𝚁 — CS2 Stats

US76561199489403458[U:1:1529137730]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,770Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since

3,473Hours in CS62Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating19,341Top 50% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#84841 of 229405 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,771 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−354Premier CS Rating · 19,695 → 19,341

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 9 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,341 -1,789 11 Aug – 19 Sept · 21 days played

24,028Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,771Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

27Days played since 2026-08-09

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,771
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 230 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

4,570 below peak (23,911)
-3,310 over 30 days · declining
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 659 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,334), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	60.1%	46.8%	48.3%	above
Shot accuracy	3.2%	13.0%	13.2%	10.0% short
Kill/death ratio	1.18	1.06	1.07	above
Match win rate	48.0%	46.3%	46.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning66

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateLWWWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +120ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 599ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 27%
Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8

Utility5.1

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels5.2

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning6.6

Utility5.1

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels5.6

Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time569ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms

Headshot accuracy28.4%+3.0%

first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 26 Aug →

44%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 5 Sept →

438msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · vertigo, 5 Sept →

13–2Biggest win · mirage, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	19	8–11	42%	0.02
dust2	C	18	8–10	44%	0.02
nuke	C	16	6–10	38%	0.03
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	0.05
ancient	C	11	4–7	36%	0.01
cache	A	11	7–4	64%	0.02
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	0.04
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.19
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.25

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,604Lifetime kills

1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players

3,781Matches

48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players

60.1%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players

3.2%Shot accuracy

10,014MVPs

2,001Hours (in match)

1,889Bombs planted

949Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,883

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,805

Desert Eagle6,110

P2000 / USP-S4,374

Glock-183,044

AWP2,628

Galil AR2,062

MP91,082

FAMAS822

Knife721

Lifetime map wins

8,678dust2

3,263inferno

3,080nuke

1,708vertigo

526train

148lake

130office

56italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

436Matches

52%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

85.7ADR

58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	103	54%	1.24	16.8
Anubis	66	56%	1.44	19.3
Ancient	65	51%	1.14	16.9
Dust2	54	48%	1.09	15.7
Nuke	37	41%	1.45	19.5
Inferno	31	52%	1.23	17.8
Vertigo	20	65%	1.26	18.8
Overpass	17	41%	1.12	16.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.8%Headshot accuracy

33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

82.6%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

569msReaction time

50.8%T opening success

53.6%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

3.71HE damage / grenade

12.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	10–13	-0.01	33%	19 Sept →
mirage	13–2	0.06	10%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.08	26%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.05	27%	16 Sept →
ancient	0–13	-0.05	26%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.09	21%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.09	19%	16 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.08	33%	15 Sept →
cache	4–13	-0.00	26%	15 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	32%	13 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.00	40%	13 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	40%	13 Sept →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	0%	13 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	36%	12 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.04	35%	8 Sept →
dust2	13–2	0.05	36%	8 Sept →
nuke	9–13	0.08	23%	7 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.02	18%	7 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	25%	7 Sept →
cache	13–3	0.04	40%	7 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.03	23%	7 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.08	27%	6 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	16%	6 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	38%	6 Sept →
inferno	2–13	0.04	44%	5 Sept →
nuke	9–4	0.23	38%	5 Sept →
vertigo	7–9	0.13	29%	5 Sept →
inferno	9–6	0.16	42%	5 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.03	27%	5 Sept →
anubis	8–13	0.02	19%	5 Sept →
mirage	14–16	-0.00	18%	5 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.04	29%	1 Sept →
nuke	13–5	-0.04	43%	1 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	27%	1 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.07	37%	1 Sept →
nuke	12–12	-0.04	27%	1 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.03	26%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.11	25%	1 Sept →
dust2	3–13	0.02	14%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.09	31%	31 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	32%	31 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.02	21%	31 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.01	22%	31 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.07	25%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	29%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	17%	31 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.08	33%	31 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	19%	31 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.11	20%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	28%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	20%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.12	38%	29 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.00	16%	29 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.00	18%	29 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.02	24%	28 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.12	28%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.06	23%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	30%	28 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.05	26%	28 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.05	18%	28 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.00	14%	28 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	24%	28 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.01	13%	27 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	19%	27 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	14%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.12	22%	27 Aug →
nuke	8–8	0.02	23%	26 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.15	29%	26 Aug →
overpass	9–3	0.25	42%	26 Aug →
vertigo	9–2	0.25	34%	26 Aug →
nuke	9–3	0.14	22%	26 Aug →
inferno	7–9	0.06	24%	26 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	38%	26 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.14	0%	25 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.02	31%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	14%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.05	15%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.10	23%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.05	35%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	31%	24 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	24%	23 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	31%	23 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.02	39%	23 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	37%	22 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	23%	22 Aug →
mirage	2–10	-0.13	11%	19 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	42%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.11	25%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	11%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.02	17%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.10	28%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	40%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	23%	15 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	14%	14 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.04	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	20%	9 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	31%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	30%	9 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	11%	9 Aug →