ivoloff

ivoloff — CS2 Stats

BR76561199484019821[U:1:1523754093]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

621Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
891Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,023 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 621 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 22 Mar 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,935 +293 27 Sept30 Dec · 12 days played
19,11720,935peak 20,93527 Sept30 Dec
21,053Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,023Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2025-03-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,023
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 477 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,167), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.1%48.3%51.0%5.8% short
Shot accuracy4.2%13.2%13.7%9.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.071.090.09 short
Match win rate58.5%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGivoloffFACEITLevel 9 · 2,023 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,023csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning41
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5149Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time611ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 16–13 · anubis, 28 Mar
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 7 May
367msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 16 Apr
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 25 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1311In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 19dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA25141156%-0.02
mirageB24111346%-0.01
anubisA1911858%-0.01
dust2D134931%-0.01
infernoA95456%0.01
cache41325%0.02
nuke32167%-0.01
overpass220100%-0.04
grail110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,436Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
1,378Matches
58.5%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 9 players
45.1%Headshot %
4.2%Shot accuracy
4,360MVPs
891Hours (in match)
2,166Bombs planted
504Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,377
AWP3,578
Knife1,011
MP91,001

Lifetime map wins

2,246dust2
1,690inferno
683vertigo
556nuke
101train
16cbble
9ar_baggage
6ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

592Matches
55%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
74.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15154%1.0313.8
Anubis14561%1.1115.4
Ancient11858%1.0514.5
Dust29437%0.9914.8
Inferno3868%1.0015.3
Nuke1771%1.0714.3
Overpass850%1.1716.1
Vertigo560%1.1217.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
609msReaction time
25.5%T opening success
30.6%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
12.41HE damage / grenade
12.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5063% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0819%11 May
inferno11–13-0.0215%10 May
ancient4–13-0.1014%10 May
mirage13–60.0122%7 May
mirage13–30.0236%7 May
cache6–130.0432%6 May
dust23–130.0118%6 May
cache10–13-0.0227%3 May
ancient16–14-0.0221%3 May
cache10–130.0321%2 May
mirage13–10-0.0218%2 May
ancient12–6-0.0125%2 May
ancient13–60.0429%1 May
anubis9–13-0.0313%1 May
mirage13–50.0622%1 May
anubis8–13-0.0913%29 Apr
anubis13–90.0619%29 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0212%29 Apr
cache13–70.0318%29 Apr
anubis13–110.0413%29 Apr
ancient7–13-0.037%28 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0321%28 Apr
inferno9–130.0336%28 Apr
ancient13–70.007%28 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0224%28 Apr
ancient13–50.0225%27 Apr
ancient8–130.0123%27 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0118%27 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0019%27 Apr
anubis13–30.0132%27 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0215%27 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0522%26 Apr
anubis13–60.0017%26 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0216%26 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0628%26 Apr
anubis12–16-0.0319%25 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0713%25 Apr
dust210–13-0.0228%25 Apr
anubis13–90.0014%25 Apr
inferno10–130.0217%25 Apr
anubis13–10.0212%25 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0320%25 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0018%25 Apr
anubis13–11-0.009%25 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0135%23 Apr
ancient9–13-0.038%16 Apr
anubis22–20-0.0210%16 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0615%14 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0314%14 Apr
mirage7–130.0117%14 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0421%14 Apr
mirage11–130.0224%13 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0116%13 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0019%7 Apr
inferno19–170.0122%7 Apr
mirage13–100.0231%4 Apr
dust29–13-0.0429%2 Apr
ancient19–22-0.0022%2 Apr
dust211–130.0416%31 Mar
dust225–23-0.0016%31 Mar
anubis16–130.0823%28 Mar
dust26–130.0214%26 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0121%25 Mar
ancient13–5-0.0617%25 Mar
ancient13–100.0017%25 Mar
dust24–130.0225%25 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0716%20 Mar
ancient11–130.0112%17 Mar
dust211–13-0.036%17 Mar
anubis13–110.0019%12 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0418%12 Mar
dust211–130.0118%12 Mar
dust222–180.0220%6 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0415%8 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0113%6 Feb
ancient6–13-0.067%7 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0415%30 Dec
ancient13–9-0.0318%30 Dec
dust213–11-0.0421%29 Dec
mirage6–130.0212%29 Dec
mirage16–14-0.0125%22 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0621%17 Dec
dust213–70.0225%5 Dec
inferno13–10-0.0217%4 Dec
dust23–5-0.097%28 Nov
mirage9–130.0315%26 Nov
ancient13–4-0.0922%22 Nov
overpass13–7-0.0415%21 Nov
nuke13–50.0132%17 Nov
mirage13–110.0125%15 Nov
ancient0–13-0.020%24 Oct
ancient13–10-0.0316%27 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0312%20 Sept
ancient13–70.0510%26 Aug
mirage14–160.0126%17 Aug
anubis9–130.0014%9 May
grail13–40.0222%9 May
inferno13–20.0626%27 Apr
mirage10–130.0411%22 Mar
inferno13–70.0613%22 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →