Adreksii8

Adreksii8 — CS2 Stats

76561199470186210[U:1:1509920482]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

276Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,701Blue band · top ~51.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 276 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 15 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,701 +6,228 15 May19 Sept · 39 days played
3,92714,344peak 14,34415 May19 Sept
14,344Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2026-05-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,643 below peak (14,344)
  • +524 over 30 days · improving
  • +6,731 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,299 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAdreksii8FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER10,701 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning47
Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY513910Last 10051%Win rateWLTLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −8.8pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility1.1
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.7
Utility1.1
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time587ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 3 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–7 · mirage, 16 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 1 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 13 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 36% over 36
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC36132336%-0.01
anubisA1710759%0.01
ancientB168850%0.02
mirageB137654%0.01
dust2A85363%-0.01
nukeS54180%0.03
cache43175%0.04
overpass110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 36). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

268Matches
48%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
80.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis6844%1.1516.1
Ancient5542%1.0515.9
Inferno5564%1.1014.8
Mirage2952%0.9514.8
Nuke2438%0.8212.6
Dust21644%0.8214.1
Cache1050%1.0915.2
Overpass944%0.9514.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
71.6%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
583msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.19Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
3.02HE damage / grenade
0.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1939 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.9165% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 36 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.0013%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.0330%26 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0313%26 Aug
ancient7–130.0315%24 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0313%23 Aug
ancient13–20.0627%23 Aug
cache13–7-0.0110%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.085%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0119%21 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0427%19 Aug
inferno8–13-0.1111%19 Aug
nuke13–70.0528%17 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0021%17 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0226%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0139%17 Aug
mirage0–70.0250%16 Aug
mirage5–130.0223%16 Aug
inferno8–130.0020%16 Aug
ancient10–130.0224%16 Aug
ancient13–60.0319%16 Aug
inferno13–80.0211%16 Aug
dust213–50.0219%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0620%16 Aug
cache13–100.0922%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0110%15 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0315%14 Aug
cache9–13-0.0315%13 Aug
ancient14–160.0017%13 Aug
ancient10–130.0831%12 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0018%12 Aug
dust213–10-0.0313%12 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0114%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.125%11 Aug
nuke15–150.0219%7 Aug
anubis13–60.0316%7 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0323%4 Aug
mirage13–110.0816%4 Aug
ancient13–110.0718%4 Aug
ancient13–160.0312%3 Aug
inferno9–30.0923%3 Aug
inferno9–30.2210%3 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0416%3 Aug
inferno9–20.1640%3 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0350%1 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0419%29 Jul
dust28–13-0.0250%18 Jul
dust29–13-0.0011%16 Jul
anubis13–70.0122%15 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0118%15 Jul
inferno9–60.0817%14 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0439%14 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0123%13 Jul
mirage13–10.0218%13 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0624%12 Jul
inferno9–30.0022%10 Jul
anubis13–90.019%10 Jul
nuke13–110.0724%10 Jul
mirage13–80.019%10 Jul
dust213–100.0133%9 Jul
dust213–10-0.0315%9 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0321%9 Jul
nuke13–90.0719%9 Jul
anubis13–100.019%9 Jul
cache13–100.1218%8 Jul
inferno4–9-0.1718%8 Jul
inferno7–9-0.1710%8 Jul
inferno8–80.0636%7 Jul
anubis4–130.0118%4 Jul
ancient13–110.0116%4 Jul
inferno3–10-0.0820%3 Jul
ancient10–130.0418%3 Jul
anubis13–50.0133%3 Jul
mirage11–130.0012%2 Jul
inferno6–90.0324%2 Jul
mirage13–100.0721%30 Jun
mirage13–100.0717%30 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0113%21 Jun
inferno5–9-0.1010%20 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0815%17 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0116%17 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0721%15 Jun
anubis13–110.0813%12 Jun
overpass13–90.0123%8 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0423%7 Jun
mirage13–60.0317%5 Jun
inferno1–6-0.1025%3 Jun
inferno9–40.0525%2 Jun
inferno9–60.105%2 Jun
anubis13–40.0518%31 May
anubis13–70.0620%25 May
inferno8–80.0612%23 May
anubis13–80.0411%23 May
inferno7–9-0.1218%23 May
inferno9–6-0.0213%23 May
inferno13–5-0.0017%22 May
dust213–6-0.0227%20 May
inferno5–9-0.0417%19 May
anubis10–130.0318%19 May
inferno3–60.0215%15 May
ancient13–90.0727%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →