Chr7s

Chr7s — CS2 Stats

CN76561199438037575[U:1:1477771847]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,110Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#18709 of 259696 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,758 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,353 +990 16 Jun – 27 Jun · 6 days played
24,36325,353peak 25,35316 Jun27 Jun
25,455Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,758Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,758
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 242 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChr7sFACEITLevel 10 · 2,758 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,758csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning52
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWLLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility6.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning5.2
Utility6.4
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time584ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 17 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · nuke, 17 Jun →
336msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · inferno, 30 Jun →
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 27 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2813–1546%0.02
nukeB158–753%0.02
mirageB126–650%0.00
dust2C114–736%-0.00
ancientA117–464%0.00
anubisS65–183%0.06
overpassA53–260%0.07
debris—31–233%0.02
vertigo—31–233%0.09
poseidon—21–150%0.04
office—11–0100%-0.01
cache—10–10%0.03
eldorado—10–10%0.06
sanctum—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,073Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
80.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage67249%1.1516.5
Ancient46551%1.1616.7
Dust231351%1.0316.1
Inferno23450%1.1416.5
Anubis21947%1.1116.9
Nuke17852%1.1416.5
Overpass9452%1.1116.5
Vertigo7953%1.1716.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.4%Spray accuracy
70.9%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
572msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
11.10HE damage / grenade
10.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7809% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–8-0.017%11 Aug →
inferno13–30.0513%27 Jul →
debris5–90.0615%23 Jul →
vertigo9–20.2011%23 Jul →
nuke9–50.1426%23 Jul →
poseidon2–9-0.0431%23 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0318%23 Jul →
vertigo8–80.1223%22 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0024%22 Jul →
dust212–16-0.0224%22 Jul →
debris9–60.0425%20 Jul →
inferno4–9-0.1112%20 Jul →
dust24–130.0415%20 Jul →
ancient13–40.0423%20 Jul →
inferno9–00.3426%17 Jul →
cache7–130.0336%14 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0217%14 Jul →
debris8–8-0.0426%13 Jul →
dust213–160.0018%13 Jul →
dust213–100.0216%13 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0312%13 Jul →
ancient16–120.0513%13 Jul →
ancient8–130.0014%13 Jul →
nuke13–110.0318%12 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0320%11 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.0232%11 Jul →
nuke13–60.0414%11 Jul →
inferno13–70.0424%11 Jul →
mirage13–60.077%10 Jul →
eldorado7–90.0616%9 Jul →
nuke6–90.0528%8 Jul →
inferno9–30.1325%8 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0418%7 Jul →
ancient13–50.0210%5 Jul →
inferno6–130.0421%4 Jul →
nuke13–110.0229%4 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.0226%2 Jul →
overpass8–80.2411%1 Jul →
inferno9–6-0.0344%1 Jul →
sanctum9–40.0123%1 Jul →
poseidon9–30.1337%1 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0315%1 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0117%1 Jul →
inferno9–60.0621%30 Jun →
inferno13–110.0417%30 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.1226%30 Jun →
mirage16–130.0324%28 Jun →
mirage11–130.0224%27 Jun →
overpass16–140.0116%27 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0214%24 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0619%23 Jun →
mirage10–130.0011%21 Jun →
mirage13–70.0419%21 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0113%18 Jun →
inferno9–60.0419%17 Jun →
nuke9–10.1950%17 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0013%17 Jun →
dust213–90.039%17 Jun →
mirage16–140.0026%16 Jun →
anubis13–90.1210%16 Jun →
anubis13–70.0622%16 Jun →
ancient13–50.0421%16 Jun →
dust213–60.0127%16 Jun →
nuke11–130.0219%15 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0425%15 Jun →
anubis13–110.0820%12 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0628%12 Jun →
inferno7–90.0021%10 Jun →
ancient14–16-0.0212%10 Jun →
inferno8–80.0721%9 Jun →
anubis13–60.0624%9 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0114%8 Jun →
overpass13–50.0012%8 Jun →
anubis13–70.0715%8 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0511%8 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0414%8 Jun →
inferno6–9-0.0546%5 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.0420%3 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.1311%3 Jun →
nuke4–9-0.0928%3 Jun →
nuke9–60.0939%3 Jun →
inferno9–70.0720%2 Jun →
vertigo2–9-0.0517%2 Jun →
inferno9–60.0335%1 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0013%1 Jun →
mirage9–130.0112%1 Jun →
inferno9–20.2221%31 May →
nuke2–9-0.2114%31 May →
inferno8–8-0.0635%30 May →
nuke9–60.0517%30 May →
nuke6–90.0541%28 May →
overpass8–80.0623%28 May →
ancient13–90.0222%26 May →
inferno9–60.0221%25 May →
inferno9–70.1329%25 May →
inferno2–9-0.1321%25 May →
ancient13–110.0126%25 May →
inferno11–130.0614%19 May →
nuke13–110.0439%16 May →
overpass13–110.0317%15 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.