AlskarDig

AlskarDig — CS2 Stats

76561199367339417[U:1:1407073689]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,243Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,336Top 25% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28296 of 252240 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,336 +207 4 Aug – 21 Sept · 17 days played
23,55125,232peak 25,2324 Aug21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,335 +0 3 Sept – 18 Sept · 2 observations
2,3352,335peak 2,3353 Sept18 Sept
25,369Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,335Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 896 below peak (25,232)
  • +42 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 664 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAlskarDigFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,336 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,335csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning50
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–41–9Last 10050%Win rateLTWWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −99ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 467ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility4.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time533ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 4 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–4 · poseidon, 8 Aug →
313msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 4 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 18cacheWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2613–1350%0.01
cacheC198–1142%0.03
mirageA1811–761%0.02
ancientA148–657%0.01
anubisC125–742%0.03
inferno—42–250%-0.04
nuke—42–250%0.01
vertigo—20–20%-0.01
poseidon—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,156Matches
51%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
80.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage32646%1.0415.5
Anubis21154%1.1316.7
Ancient21049%1.0516.1
Nuke18357%1.0916.9
Vertigo16451%1.1716.5
Dust210150%1.0015.1
Inferno9342%1.0315.6
Overpass5465%1.1315.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
514msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
5.06HE damage / grenade
6.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4488 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.712% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0233%21 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0522%21 Sept →
cache13–50.0623%21 Sept →
dust213–100.0044%21 Sept →
anubis17–19-0.0526%21 Sept →
ancient13–100.0231%21 Sept →
mirage13–10.0511%21 Sept →
mirage0–8-0.0814%21 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0237%20 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0441%20 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0223%20 Sept →
cache13–90.0129%19 Sept →
anubis11–130.0321%19 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0324%19 Sept →
anubis13–10.0521%19 Sept →
cache12–120.0027%19 Sept →
cache2–130.0324%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0731%19 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0326%19 Sept →
cache14–160.0220%18 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0119%17 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0520%17 Sept →
anubis13–50.0530%17 Sept →
mirage16–120.0421%17 Sept →
ancient13–40.0417%17 Sept →
dust213–70.0624%17 Sept →
cache13–110.0031%16 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0427%16 Sept →
cache12–120.0524%16 Sept →
dust28–130.0440%14 Sept →
cache1–40.0133%13 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0415%13 Sept →
dust213–110.0522%11 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0230%11 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0926%11 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0221%10 Sept →
cache10–130.0827%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0112%9 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0123%9 Sept →
ancient13–10.0318%9 Sept →
anubis13–50.0824%9 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0038%9 Sept →
mirage13–00.0117%9 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0425%8 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.1533%7 Sept →
ancient13–00.0235%7 Sept →
dust213–7-0.098%7 Sept →
anubis13–40.1134%7 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0129%7 Sept →
mirage13–60.0220%7 Sept →
dust213–60.0330%6 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0425%5 Sept →
mirage10–10.0327%5 Sept →
nuke8–80.0238%5 Sept →
mirage13–90.0523%5 Sept →
dust26–130.0341%26 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0122%25 Aug →
mirage7–130.0733%25 Aug →
ancient10–130.0119%24 Aug →
mirage4–130.0214%23 Aug →
cache13–50.1431%22 Aug →
anubis5–130.0221%21 Aug →
cache13–80.0827%21 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0220%20 Aug →
cache13–60.0415%20 Aug →
nuke9–60.0518%19 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0422%19 Aug →
cache4–130.1017%19 Aug →
vertigo11–130.0317%18 Aug →
mirage13–50.1325%17 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0428%16 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.057%16 Aug →
inferno9–30.0117%16 Aug →
inferno13–70.0114%15 Aug →
anubis13–110.0410%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0213%12 Aug →
dust213–70.0517%12 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0132%10 Aug →
dust213–60.0726%8 Aug →
poseidon9–40.0550%8 Aug →
dust20–3-0.090%8 Aug →
ancient13–60.0714%8 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.1217%7 Aug →
dust228–26-0.0019%7 Aug →
ancient6–130.0519%7 Aug →
ancient13–60.0623%6 Aug →
dust213–60.1126%6 Aug →
mirage13–40.1122%6 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0810%5 Aug →
cache12–120.0416%4 Aug →
mirage5–130.1129%4 Aug →
dust213–40.1629%4 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0243%4 Aug →
dust213–20.0422%4 Aug →
ancient13–110.0019%4 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0940%4 Aug →
anubis12–120.0933%3 Aug →
nuke13–90.0850%3 Aug →
dust27–130.0924%3 Aug →
mirage5–130.0216%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.