M1- — CS2 Stats

76561199350262168[U:1:1389996440]✓ No bans

2,115Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,341Purple band · top ~19.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11900 of 21323 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,484 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGM1-FACEITLevel 8 · 1,484 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,341 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning46
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLWLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression4.9
Utility3.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.6
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time584ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–5
133Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA33181555%-0.02
dust2B25131252%-0.00
ancientC1881044%0.00
anubisC104640%0.01
cacheA95456%0.01
nuke32167%0.00
inferno21150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,717Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
70.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage70554%0.9713.5
Dust238250%0.9813.4
Ancient23447%0.9413.8
Anubis19449%1.0214.7
Inferno10742%0.8712.6
Nuke4351%0.9812.3
Overpass2348%1.0215.8
Train1346%0.8613.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
86.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
586msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
3.50HE damage / grenade
8.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.45 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4116% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0221%27 Aug
anubis6–3-0.0517%27 Aug
dust211–130.0122%27 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0124%27 Aug
dust213–90.0434%27 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0312%27 Aug
dust216–140.0321%26 Aug
mirage4–130.0618%26 Aug
ancient13–40.0321%26 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0519%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0913%26 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1025%26 Aug
ancient7–130.0021%25 Aug
nuke13–90.0731%25 Aug
mirage16–140.0032%25 Aug
dust213–100.0515%25 Aug
mirage19–16-0.0328%24 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0120%24 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0123%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0420%23 Aug
ancient8–130.0020%22 Aug
anubis13–70.0915%22 Aug
inferno15–150.0628%22 Aug
mirage6–130.0312%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0228%22 Aug
anubis6–130.0340%22 Aug
anubis6–130.0326%21 Aug
dust28–13-0.0323%20 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0428%20 Aug
dust213–6-0.0220%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0530%20 Aug
mirage6–130.0320%20 Aug
dust27–13-0.0021%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0318%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0312%19 Aug
mirage9–130.0324%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0224%17 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0416%17 Aug
dust23–130.0116%16 Aug
ancient9–130.0023%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0411%12 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0116%12 Aug
anubis14–160.0115%11 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0722%10 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0127%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0912%9 Aug
dust213–30.0829%8 Aug
anubis14–160.0129%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0513%8 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0415%7 Aug
dust213–110.0330%7 Aug
ancient11–130.0021%7 Aug
mirage19–17-0.0413%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0122%6 Aug
anubis13–70.0220%6 Aug
inferno13–110.0123%5 Aug
mirage13–100.0215%4 Aug
anubis7–13-0.009%3 Aug
cache9–13-0.1117%3 Aug
dust216–140.0520%1 Aug
dust213–80.0513%31 Jul
dust213–50.0932%31 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0323%31 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0619%29 Jul
dust213–11-0.0028%28 Jul
mirage16–140.0213%27 Jul
mirage13–60.0520%26 Jul
cache13–11-0.0626%26 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0318%26 Jul
dust213–8-0.0810%25 Jul
dust211–13-0.0723%25 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0714%25 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0626%22 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0610%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0118%22 Jul
dust213–11-0.0512%22 Jul
mirage13–8-0.059%21 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0818%20 Jul
mirage1–13-0.117%20 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0019%20 Jul
ancient7–130.0419%20 Jul
cache13–90.0218%19 Jul
nuke13–90.0217%19 Jul
cache13–80.0725%19 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0334%19 Jul
cache13–30.0630%18 Jul
ancient13–70.0623%18 Jul
ancient9–20.0410%18 Jul
cache3–130.0131%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0518%17 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0018%17 Jul
dust25–13-0.0413%16 Jul
mirage16–140.0422%16 Jul
ancient13–30.0913%14 Jul
cache3–130.0617%14 Jul
cache13–100.0018%14 Jul
dust213–30.0020%14 Jul
cache15–150.0226%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0324%13 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0412%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →