Sanksura

Sanksura — CS2 Stats

NO76561199277494605[U:1:1317228877]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,372Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,893Top 25% of 211,494 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#44507 of 258456 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,289 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (33 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,893 → 22,893
0Faceit ELO · 2,289 → 2,289
+115Tracked matches · now 6,372
−3.5ppWin rate · 58.6% → 55.2%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,893 +3,160 28 Mar – 26 Sept · 9 days played
19,45322,893peak 22,89328 Mar26 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,289 +0 6 Sept – 26 Sept · 4 observations
2,2892,289peak 2,2896 Sept26 Sept
22,893Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,289Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-01-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,289
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 211 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,893
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,107 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSanksuraFACEITLevel 10 · 2,289 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,893 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,289csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning55
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility3.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.5
Utility3.4
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time543ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy28.5%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 30.6% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–0 · overpass, 18 Mar →
61%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · overpass, 18 Mar →
383msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · anubis, 1 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 22 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
3–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 29nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2917–1259%0.03
anubisB147–750%0.00
ancientC125–742%0.02
nukeD124–833%0.02
infernoA116–555%0.04
dust2A116–555%0.04
overpass—42–250%0.05
cache—20–20%-0.05
vertigo—21–150%0.04
train—21–150%0.03
cache_b—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,795Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
80.9ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage91751%1.0816.7
Ancient77453%1.1117.1
Anubis62750%1.0716.9
Nuke25651%1.1016.6
Dust221747%1.0416.3
Inferno21450%1.1317.3
Vertigo13147%1.0716.8
Overpass11647%1.0616.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.4%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.9%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
528msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.76HE damage / grenade
3.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4473 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.548% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0314%26 Oct →
ancient13–60.0728%22 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0218%21 Oct →
ancient13–110.0413%14 Oct →
anubis10–130.0226%12 Oct →
mirage13–100.0535%11 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0218%10 Oct →
mirage6–130.0716%10 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0532%5 Oct →
nuke5–130.0128%30 Sept →
mirage22–20-0.0220%30 Sept →
ancient8–130.0318%25 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0219%23 Sept →
dust216–130.0836%21 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0628%17 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.1030%17 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.1022%17 Sept →
nuke16–120.0936%16 Sept →
mirage13–60.0835%16 Sept →
ancient13–80.0426%8 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0438%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.0330%7 Sept →
mirage13–70.0132%1 Sept →
dust220–22-0.0328%22 Jul →
mirage13–60.0148%22 Jul →
dust213–00.0042%22 Jul →
vertigo12–120.0243%8 Jul →
anubis16–130.1230%14 May →
inferno13–100.0528%13 May →
overpass13–70.0420%13 May →
nuke13–80.0931%12 May →
dust213–80.1437%12 May →
inferno7–130.0038%12 May →
inferno13–50.0938%12 May →
mirage10–130.0526%12 May →
dust26–130.0047%12 May →
mirage11–130.0623%12 May →
inferno13–100.0330%12 May →
mirage13–90.0627%12 May →
inferno13–160.0832%9 May →
mirage13–70.0829%9 May →
mirage11–130.0319%9 May →
mirage4–13-0.0321%5 May →
mirage13–60.0338%13 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.1222%12 Apr →
nuke6–130.0231%10 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0133%9 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0125%9 Apr →
inferno13–60.0731%8 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0236%6 Apr →
ancient11–130.0025%2 Apr →
anubis13–90.0328%1 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0038%31 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0333%31 Mar →
anubis13–7-0.0640%30 Mar →
ancient14–16-0.0020%30 Mar →
inferno13–90.0550%28 Mar →
nuke13–160.1638%19 Mar →
mirage13–80.0940%19 Mar →
mirage9–130.0225%19 Mar →
mirage13–10.0523%18 Mar →
dust213–90.0333%18 Mar →
mirage13–60.0929%18 Mar →
overpass7–130.0128%18 Mar →
mirage13–10.0726%18 Mar →
dust213–50.1230%18 Mar →
mirage13–90.0129%18 Mar →
overpass13–00.1961%18 Mar →
dust211–130.0440%18 Mar →
mirage10–130.0832%17 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0122%16 Mar →
mirage12–16-0.0445%12 Mar →
mirage19–16-0.0217%12 Mar →
anubis13–7-0.0416%6 Mar →
anubis13–60.1035%5 Mar →
inferno8–130.0338%5 Mar →
ancient13–60.0023%4 Mar →
dust212–160.0044%24 Feb →
mirage11–130.0128%24 Feb →
anubis13–60.1148%24 Feb →
inferno15–190.0425%24 Feb →
ancient10–130.0133%19 Feb →
inferno13–70.0025%18 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0529%12 Feb →
nuke13–100.0230%2 Feb →
nuke7–130.0513%1 Feb →
dust213–160.0525%1 Feb →
anubis14–160.0224%1 Feb →
anubis10–130.0112%1 Feb →
mirage13–50.0134%30 Jan →
nuke13–60.0433%30 Jan →
dust213–90.0542%30 Jan →
vertigo13–70.0536%30 Jan →
train16–140.0526%30 Jan →
cache_b7–13-0.0719%30 Jan →
train12–160.0026%30 Jan →
mirage16–130.0340%30 Jan →
nuke13–16-0.0217%30 Jan →
mirage13–100.0435%29 Jan →
ancient7–130.0333%29 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.