adilG

adilG — CS2 Stats

76561199251538470[U:1:1291272742]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,102Tracked matches41%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,596 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,596 → 1,596
+47Tracked matches · now 1,102
−13.8ppWin rate · 55.2% → 41.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 59 days played since 20 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,189 -372 13 Jun3 Jul · 5 days played
17,18918,654peak 18,65413 Jun3 Jul
18,654Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,596Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
59Days played since 2026-04-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,596
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 155 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGadilGFACEITLevel 9 · 1,596 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,596csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning47
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55441Last 10055%Win rateWLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 468ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility7.6
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.7
Utility7.6
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time526ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 12 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · nuke, 10 May
359msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 14 Sept
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 27dust2Weakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA27171063%0.04
ancientA2213959%0.02
dust2C1771041%0.01
mirageB126650%0.01
anubisA106460%-0.00
nukeA95456%0.01
cache21150%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,367Matches
50%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
82.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust223147%1.2316.5
Inferno20655%1.3617.1
Ancient16657%1.0915.8
Mirage15147%1.1515.5
Anubis12047%1.1416.4
Nuke5953%1.0716.0
Vertigo2035%0.9616.9
Train1638%0.9815.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
525msReaction time
25.6%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
11.14HE damage / grenade
15.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.6123% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–30.0820%14 Sept
ancient6–130.0325%13 Sept
inferno12–160.0621%13 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0226%8 Sept
ancient13–30.0314%7 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0321%4 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0221%4 Sept
dust212–16-0.0319%1 Sept
inferno11–130.0425%30 Aug
ancient5–130.0222%22 Aug
inferno13–160.0219%21 Aug
ancient12–160.0417%27 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0221%26 Jul
ancient11–130.0116%26 Jul
dust213–30.0533%26 Jul
dust213–30.0832%25 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0226%11 Jul
ancient9–130.0518%9 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0810%8 Jul
dust28–13-0.0312%6 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0218%3 Jul
inferno6–130.1033%3 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0119%2 Jul
dust28–13-0.0126%30 Jun
anubis13–40.0111%28 Jun
dust213–90.1126%23 Jun
nuke15–150.0819%23 Jun
ancient13–60.1522%23 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0017%22 Jun
ancient13–90.0425%15 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0119%14 Jun
ancient13–40.0817%14 Jun
dust27–13-0.026%13 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0229%12 Jun
inferno13–60.0741%11 Jun
nuke13–30.0222%11 Jun
mirage13–60.0424%11 Jun
anubis22–250.0118%11 Jun
ancient13–60.0314%11 Jun
mirage16–130.0613%10 Jun
mirage8–130.0213%10 Jun
mirage13–90.0930%10 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0118%8 Jun
nuke13–90.0931%8 Jun
dust27–13-0.0221%8 Jun
ancient13–80.0624%7 Jun
dust213–7-0.0913%7 Jun
nuke10–130.0614%5 Jun
inferno13–70.079%4 Jun
mirage13–110.0316%2 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0021%27 May
dust213–40.0415%27 May
inferno11–130.0114%26 May
inferno13–110.1026%25 May
anubis13–10-0.0211%23 May
cache9–13-0.0324%23 May
ancient13–4-0.0113%22 May
inferno7–13-0.0323%21 May
anubis13–8-0.024%20 May
ancient13–100.0232%19 May
inferno13–90.0517%18 May
ancient10–13-0.0317%16 May
anubis13–100.0227%15 May
mirage2–8-0.0333%13 May
mirage8–130.0518%13 May
inferno13–90.0413%13 May
inferno13–50.1622%12 May
dust29–130.0127%12 May
overpass11–13-0.0810%11 May
mirage11–13-0.1012%10 May
nuke0–3-0.0050%10 May
anubis13–160.0217%9 May
inferno13–50.0815%9 May
inferno19–150.0522%7 May
dust21–130.0322%4 May
inferno16–14-0.0223%4 May
dust21–13-0.0526%3 May
dust213–50.023%3 May
anubis13–60.0118%2 May
nuke13–9-0.0022%28 Apr
inferno13–80.0417%28 Apr
dust211–130.0319%27 Apr
ancient13–80.0316%27 Apr
inferno0–13-0.025%27 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0217%27 Apr
mirage19–160.0416%27 Apr
anubis13–100.026%27 Apr
inferno13–80.0111%27 Apr
inferno13–90.0419%27 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0819%26 Apr
ancient13–100.0019%26 Apr
dust25–13-0.0619%26 Apr
cache13–10-0.0125%26 Apr
inferno12–160.0216%26 Apr
dust213–90.0615%25 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0625%22 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0721%22 Apr
inferno11–130.0012%22 Apr
ancient11–130.0620%20 Apr
inferno13–110.0817%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →